Real Power Loss Reduction and Voltage Stability Enhancement by Stock Exchange, Product Demand-Availability, Affluent and Penurious Algorithms

Kanagasabai Lenin

Abstract


In this paper, the Stock Exchange Algorithm (SEA), the Product Demand-Availability (PDA) algorithm, and the Affluent and Penurious (AP) algorithm are proposed to solve the power loss reduction problem. In the SEA approach, selling and buying shares in the stock exchange was imitated to design the algorithm. Stockholders are classified as Privileged, Average or Weak based on their fitness value. The PDA optimization algorithm is based on the consumer demand and availability of a product in the market. The Affluent and Penurious algorithm mimics the social behavior of people. The gap parameter (G) is defined to indicate the growing gap between affluent and penurious people when affluent people increase their wealth. The proposed Stock Exchange Algorithm, Product Demand-Availability optimization algorithm and the Affluent and Penurious optimization algorithm were tested in the IEEE 30 bus system. Real power loss minimization, voltage deviation minimization, and voltage stability index enhancement were successfully attained.


Keywords


affluent and penurious; availability-requirement; gap parameter; optimal reactive power; product; shares; stock exchange; transmission loss

Full Text:

PDF

References


Lee, K., Park, Y., Ortiz, J., A United Approach to Optimal Real and Reactive Power Dispatch. IEEE Transactions Power Apparatus System, Vol. PAS 104, pp. 1147-1153, 1985.

Domel, H.W. & Tinney, W.F., Optimal Power Flow Solutions, IEEE Transactions, PAS-87, pp. 1866-1876, 1968.

Yu, D.C., Fagan, J.E., Foote, B. & Aly, A.A., An Optimal Load Flow Study by The Generalized Reduced Gradient Approach, Electric Power Systems Research, 10(1), pp. 47-53, 1986.

Sun, D.I., Ashley, B., Brewer, B., Hughes, A. & Tinney, W.F., Optimal Power Flow by Newton Approach, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 103(10), pp. 2864-2880, 1984.

Granville, S., Optimal Reactive Dispatch Through Interior Point Methods, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 9(1), pp. 136-146, 1994.

Rezania, E. & Shahidehpour, S.M., Real Power Loss Minimization Using Interior Point Method, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 23(1), pp. 45-56, 2001.

Zhu, J. & Xiong, X., Optimal Reactive Power Control Using Modified Interior Point Method, Electric Power Systems Research, 66(2), pp. 187–192, 2003.

Alsac, O., Bright, J., Prais, M. & Stott, B., Further Developments In LP-Based Optimal Power Flow, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 5(3), pp. 697-711, 1990.

Stott, B. & Marinho, J.L., Linear Programming for Power System Network Security Applications, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 98(3), pp. 837-848, 1979.

Chebbo, A.M. & Irving, M.R., Combined Active and Reactive Dispatch. I. Problem Formulation and Solution Algorithm, IEE Proceedings-Generation, Transmission and Distribution, 142(4), pp. 393-400, 1995.

Lu, F.C. & Hsu, Y.Y., Reactive Power/Voltage Control in A Distribution Substation Using Dynamic Programming, IEE Proceedings Generation, Transmission and Distribution, 142(6), pp. 639-645, 1995.

Quintana, V.H. & Santos-Nieto, M., Reactive-Power Dispatch by Successive Quadratic Programming, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 4(3), pp. 425-435, 1989.

Grudinin, N., Reactive Power Optimization Using Successive Quadratic Programming Method, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 13(4), pp. 1219-1225, 1998.

de Sousa, V., Baptista, E. & da Costa, G., Optimal Reactive Power Flow Via the Modified Barrier Lagrangian Function Approach, Electric Power Systems Research, 84(1), pp. 159-164, 2012.

Cao, Y.J. & Wu, Q.H., Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch Using an Adaptive Genetic Algorithm, in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Genetic Algorithms in Engineering Systems, pp. 117–122, Glasgow, UK, 1997.

Khanmiri, D.T., Nasiri, N. & Abedinzadeh, T., Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch Using an Improved Genetic Algorithm, International Journal of Computer and Electrical Engineering, 4(4), pp. 463-466, 2012.

Pal, B.B., Biswas, P. & Mukhopadhyay, A., GA Based FGP Approach for Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch, Procedia Technology, 10, pp. 464-473, 2013.

Alam, M.S. & De, M., Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch Using Hybrid Loop-Genetic Based Algorithm, in Proceedings of the 2016 19th National Power Systems Conference (NPSC), pp. 1-6, Bhubaneswar, India, December 2016.

Rayudu, K., Yesuratnam, G. & Jayalaxmi, A., Improving Voltage Stability by Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch Based on Genetic Algorithm and Linear Programming Technique, in Complexity 27 Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, and Optimization Techniques, ICEEOT 2016, pp. 1357-1362, March 2016.

Ela, A.A.A.E., Abido, M.A. & Spea, S.R., Differential Evolution Algorithm for Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch, Electric Power Systems Research, 81(2), pp. 458-464, 2011.

Singh, H. & Srivastava, L., Modified Differential Evolution Algorithm for Multi-Objective VAR Management, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 55, pp. 731– 740, 2014.

Basu, M., Quasi-Oppositional Differential Evolution for Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 78, pp. 29-40, 2016.

Basu, M., Multi-Objective Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch Using Multi-Objective Differential Evolution, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 82, pp. 213-224, 2016.

Li, Y., Li, X. & Li, Z., Reactive Power Optimization Using Hybrid CABC-DE Algorithm, Electric Power Components and Systems, 45(9), pp. 980-989, 2017.

Kumari, M. & Sydulu, M., Improved Particle Swarm Algorithm Applied to Optimal Reactive Power Control, in Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology, pp. 1873-1878, Mumbai, India, December 2006.

Cai, G., Ren, Z. & Yu, T., Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch Based on Modified Particle Swarm Optimization Considering Voltage Stability, in Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, pp. 1-5, Tampa, FL, USA, June 2007.

Mahadevan, K. & Kannan, P.S., Comprehensive Learning Particle Swarm Optimization for Reactive Power Dispatch Applied Sof Computing, 10(2), pp. 641-652, 2010.

Polprasert, J., Ongsakul, W. & Dieu, V.N., Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch Using Improved Pseudo-Gradient Search Particle Swarm Optimization, Electric Power Components and Systems, 44(5), pp. 518-532, 2016.

Mehdinejad, M., Mohammadi-Ivatloo, B., DadashzadehBonab, R. & Zare, K., Solution of Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch of Power Systems Using Hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization and Imperialist Competitive Algorithms, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 83, pp. 104-116, 2016.

Naderi, E., Narimani, H., Fathi, M. & Narimani, M.R., A Novel Fuzzy Adaptive Configuration of Particle Swarm Optimization to Solve Large-Scale Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch, Applied Sof Computing, 53, pp. 441-456, 2017.

Ding, J., Zhang, Q. & Ma, Y., Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch Based on The CS-PSO Algorithm, in Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA), IEEE, Wuhan, China, 2018.

Morsali, J., Zare, K., Tarafdar Hagh, M., Performance Comparison of TCSC with TCPS And SSSC Controllers in AGC of Realistic Interconnected Multi-Sources Power System, Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 7(1), pp. 143-158, 2016.

Arifoğlu, U. & Yalçin, F., System Constrained Active Power Loss Minimization in Practical Multi-terminal HVDC Systems through GA, Sakarya University Journal of Science, 10.16984/saufenbilder.421351, (1-1), (2018).

Wei, H., Lin, C. & Wang, Y., The Optimal Reactive Power Flow Model in Mixed Polar Form Based on Transformer Dummy Nodes. IEEJ Trans Elec Electron Eng., 13, pp. 411-416, 2018.

Fang, S, Cheng, H, Xu, G, Zhou, Q, He, H. & Zeng, P., Stochastic Optimal Reactive Power Reserve Dispatch Considering Voltage Control Areas, Int. Trans. Electr. Energ. Syst. 2017.

Ghazavi Dozein, M., Monsef, H., Ansari, J. & Kazemi, A., An Effective Decentralized Scheme to Monitor and Control the Reactive Power Flow: A Holonic‐Based Strategy, Int. Trans. Electr. Energ. Syst., 26, pp. 1184-1209, 2016.

Du, Z., Nie, Y. & Liao, P., PCPDIPM‐Based Optimal Reactive Power Flow Model Using Augmented Rectangular Coordinates, Int. Trans. Electr. Energ. Syst., 24, pp. 597-608, 2014.

Liu, B., Liu, F., Zhai, B. & Lan, H., Investigating Continuous Power Flow Solutions of IEEE 14‐Bus System. IEEJ Trans Elec Electron Eng., 14, pp. 157-159, 2019.

Soodi, H.A. & Vural A.M., STATCOM Estimation Using Backpropagation, PSO, Shuffled Frog Leap Algorithm, and Genetic Algorithm Based Neural Networks, Comput Intell Neurosci, 2018(1), pp.1-17, 2018. DOI: 10.1155/2018/6381610

Gagliano A. & Nocera F., Analysis of The Performances of Electric Energy Storage in Residential Applications, International Journal of Heat and Technology, 35(1), pp. S41-S48, 2017, DOI: 10.18280/ijht.35Sp0106.

Caldera, M., Ungaro, P., Cammarata, G. & Puglisi G., Survey-Based Analysis of The Electrical Energy Demand in Italian Households, Mathematical Modelling of Engineering Problems, 5(3), pp. 217-224. DOI: 10.18280/mmep.050313

Do, D.T.T. & Lee, J., A Modified Symbiotic Organisms Search (Msos) Algorithm for Optimization of Pin-Jointed Structures, Appl. Soft Comput., 61, pp. 683-699, 2017.

Panda, A. & Pani, S., A Symbiotic Organisms Search Algorithm with Adaptive Penalty Function to Solve Multi-Objective Constrained Optimization Problems, Appl. Soft Comput., 46, pp. 344-360, 2016.

Shiva, C.K. & Mukherjee, V., A Novel Quasi-Oppositional Harmony Search Algorithm for Automatic Generation Control of Power System, Appl. Soft Comput., 35, pp. 749-765, 2015.

Bouchekara, H.R.E.H., Zellagui, M. & Abido, M.A., Optimal Coordination of Directional Overcurrent Relays Using A Modified Electromagnetic Field Optimization Algorithm, Applied Soft Computing, 54, pp. 267-283, 2017.

Talebi, B. & Dehkordi, M.N., Sensitive Association Rules Hiding Using Electromagnetic Field Optimization Algorithm, Expert Systems with Applications, 114, pp. 155-172, 2018.

Becerra. & Cooray, V., A Simplified Physical Model to Determine the Lightning Upward Connecting Leader Inception, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 21, pp. 897-908, 2006.

Nematollahi, F., Rahiminejad, A. & Vahidi, B., A Novel Physical Based Meta-Heuristic Optimization Method Known as Lightning Attachment Procedure Optimization, Applied Soft Computing, 59, pp. 596-621, 2017, DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2017.06.033.

Illinois Center for a Smarter Electric Grid (ICSEG), Available online: https://icseg.iti.illinois.edu/ieee-30-bussystem/ (accessed on 25 February 2019).

El Ela, A.A., Abido, M.A. & Spea, S.R., Differential Evolution Algorithm for Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch, Electr. Power Syst. Res., 81, pp. 458-464, 2011.

Duman, S., Sönmez, Y., Güvenç, U. & Yörükeren, N., Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch Using a Gravitational Search Algorithm, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 6, pp. 563-576, 2012.

Aljohani, T.M., Ebrahim, A.F. & Mohammed, O., Single and Multiobjective Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch Based on Hybrid Artificial Physics–Particle Swarm Optimization, Energies, 12, pp. 2333, 2019.

Dai, C., Chen, W., Zhu, Y. & Zhang, X., Seeker Optimization Algorithm for Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch, IEEE T. Power Syst., 24(3), pp. 1218-1231, 2009.

Subbaraj, P. & Rajnarayan, P.N., Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch Using Self-Adaptive Real Coded Genetic Algorithm. Electr. Power Syst. Res., 79(2), pp. 374-38, 2009.

Pandya, S. & Roy, R., Particle Swarm Optimization Based Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch. Proceeding of the IEEE International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Technologies (ICECCT), pp. 1-5.

Hussain, A.N., Abdullah, A.A. & Neda, O.M., Modified Particle Swarm Optimization for Solution of Reactive Power Dispatch, Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 15(8), pp. 316-327, 2018 DOI:10.19026/rjaset.15.5917.

Reddy, S.S., Optimal Reactive Power Scheduling Using Cuckoo Search Algorithm, International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 7(5), pp. 2349-2356. 2017.

Reddy, S.S., Faster Evolutionary Algorithm Based Optimal Power Flow Using Incremental Variables, Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 54, pp. 198-210, 2014.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5614%2Fitbj.ict.res.appl.2020.14.2.5

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Contact Information:

LPPM – ITB, 

Center for Research and Community Services (CRCS) Building Floor 7th, 
Jl. Ganesha No. 10 Bandung 40132, Indonesia,

Tel. +62-22-86010080,

Fax.: +62-22-86010051;

e-mail: jictra@lppm.itb.ac.id.