Kepemimpinan dan Perencanaan Kolaboratif pada Masyarakat Non Kolaboratif

Ely Sufianty


Abstrak: Perencanaan kolaboratif dianggap dapat memecahkan permasalahan yang melibatkan banyak pemangku kepentingan pada masyarakat yang semakin terfragmentasi dan semakin kompleks. Namun, perencanaan kolaboratif memiliki kelemahan karena hanya dapat dilakukan dalam kondisi partisipasi masyarakat yang baik. Makalah ini mengkaji peran kepemimpinan dalam proses kolaboratif pada masyarakat yang bersifat nonkolaboratif. Hasil analisis menemukan bahwa perencanaan kolaboratif merupakan pendekatan yang ideal, tetapi sulit untuk diimplementasikan. Pada studi kasus relokasi PKL di Kota Surakarta, peran kepemimpinan penting pada masyarakat non-kolaboratif, dari awal sampai akhir proses relokasi, sehingga mampu membawa mereka menuju proses perencanaan kolaboratif.

Kata kunci: Kepemimpinan, perencanaan kolaboratif, partisipasi masyarakat

Abstract: Collaborative planning is considered to be able to solve problems involving many stakeholders in increasingly fragmented and complex society. However, ollaborative planning can only be done in a good condition of participation. This paper assesses roles of leadership in collaborative process in non collaborative society. The results of the analysis found that collaborative planning is an ideal approach, but difficult to implement. The case study of street vendors relocation in Surakarta shows an important leadership role in a noncollaborative society, from the beginning to the end of the relocation process, leading towards collaborative planning process.

Keywords: Leadership, collaborative planning, community participation

Full Text:



Allmendinger, P. (2001) Planning in the Post Modern Times. London: Routledge.

Allmendinger, P. (2002) Planning Theory. New York: Palgrave.

Anshell, C. and Gash. (2008) Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Publik Administration Research and Theory 18, 543-571.

Beckman, Norman. (1964) The Planner as a Bureaucrat. In Andreas Faludi (Ed.) A Reader in Planning Theory (1973), 251-264. Oxford: Pergamon Press Ltd.

Bertaina, et. al. (2006) Study for the State Trust Lands Partnership Project of the Sonoran Institute and the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. Building Trust: Lessons From Collaborative Planning on State Trust Lands

Burns, J. M. (2010) Leadership. New York: Harper Perrenial Political Classic.

Bryson dan Crosby. (2005) Leadership for the Common Good: Tackling Public Problems in a Shared-Power World. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.

Collins, Philip. (2009) 'Libertarian Paternalism': Guiding Without Coercion . Complete video at: Diunduh pada tanggal 6 Desember 2011

Davidoff, Paul. (1965) Advocacy and Pluralism in Planning. In Andreas Faludi (Ed.) A Reader in Planning Theory (1973), 277-296. Oxford: Pergamon Press Ltd.

De Roo, Gert and Porter, Geoff. (2007) Fuzzy Planning, The Role of Actors in a Fuzzy Governance Environment. Hampshire: Ashgate Publ Ltd.

Dyckman, John W. (1961) What makes Planner’s Plan? In Andreas Faludi (Ed.) A Reader in Planning Theory (1973), 243-250. Oxford: Pergamon Press Ltd.

Ezioni, Amitai. (1967) Mixed Scanning: A Third Appriach to Decision Making. In: Andreas Faludi (Ed.) A Reader in Planning Theory (1973), 217-229. Oxford: Pergamon Press Ltd.

Faludi. (1973) A Reader in Planning Theory (1973). Oxford: Pergamon Press Ltd.

Flyvbjerg, Bent. (1998) Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice. The University of Chicago Press.

Forester, John. (2000) The Deliberative Practitioner Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Friedman, John. (1987) Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action. New Jersey: Princeton Univ. Press.

Friedmann, John. (1973) Retracking America: A Theory of Transactive Planning. Garden City. New York: Anchor Press/Doubleday.

Gedikli, B. (2009) The Role Of Leadership In The Success Of Participatory Planning rocesses: Experience From Turkey. European Urban And Regional Studies 16, 115.

Graham, S. and Healey, P. (1999) Relational Concepts of Space and Place: Issues for Planning Theory and Practice. European Planning Studies 7 (5), 623-646.

Gunton, Thomas I. & Day, J.C. (2003) The theory and practice of collaborative planning in resource and environmental management.

Habermas, J. (1984) Theory of Communicative Action, Vol 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

Hardiman, F. Budi. (2008) Teori Dikursus dan Demokrasi: Peralihan dari Habermas ke dalam Filsafat Politik. Diskursus, 17 (1), April 2008, 1-27.

Healey, Patsy (2007) Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies: Towards a Relational Planning for Our Times. New York: Routledge.

Healey, Patsy. (2006) Collaborative Planning, Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. 2nd ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Healey, Patsy. (1997) Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hudson, Barclay M. (1979) Comparison of Current Planning Theories: Counterparts and Contradictions. APA JOURNAL. Oktober, 387-398.

Huxham, Chris, and Siv Vangen. (2000) Leadership in the Shaping and Implementation of Collaboration Agendas: How Things Happen in a (Not Quite) Joined-Up World. Academy of Management Journal 43, 1159–75. Diunduh pada tanggal 5 Mei 2011

Innes, J.E. (1996) Planning Through Consensus Building, a New View of Comprehensive Planning Ideal. Journal of American Planning Association 62 (4).

Innes, J.E. and Booher, D.E. (2000) Collaborative Dialogue as a Policy Making Strategy. Institute of Urban and Regional Development University of California, Berkeley. IURD Working Paper. Diunduh pada tanggal 13 Desember 2010.

Innes, J.E. and Booher, D.E. (2010) Beyond Collaboration Democratic Governance for a Resilient Society, in Planning with Complexity, An Introduction to collaborative rationality or public policy. Oxon: Routledge.

John, Peter and Cole, Alistair. (1999) Political Leadership in the New Urban Governance: Britain and France compared., Local Government Studies 25 (4), 98-115.

Johnston, E. et al. (2010) Managing the Inclusion Process in Collaborative Governance. Journal of Publik Administrastion Research and Theory. muq045 first published online Sager, T. 2005. Communicative Planners as Naïve Mandarins of Neo-liberal State? European Journal of Spatial Development.

Kartodirdjo, Sartono. (1999) Pengantar Sejarah Indonesia Baru : Sejarah Pergerakan Nasional, Dari Kolonialisme sampai Nasionalisme jilid 2. Jakarta : Gramedia.

Lindblom, C. (1959) The Science of Muddling Through. Public Administration Review 19 (2), 79-88.

Meyerson, M. and Banfield, E. (1955) Politics, Planning and the Public Interest. New York: Free Press.

Palermo, P.C. and Ponzini. (2010) Spatial Planning and Urban Development, Critical Perspective. Springer

Pelras, Christian. (1981) Hubungan Patron Klein pada Masyarakat Bugis dan Makassar di Sulawesi Selatan. Makalah disajikan pada Konferensi Sulawesi Selatan Pertama di Monash University, Melbourne.

Rittel, H.W. dan Webber, M.M. (1973) Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences 4, 155-169.

Sager, T. (2005) Communicative Planners as Naïve Mandarins of Neo-liberal State? European Journal of Spatial Development.

Sager, T. (1994) Communicative Planning Theory. Aldershot: Avebury.

Sumarto, Hetifah. (2003) Inovasi, Partisipasi, dan Good Governance. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia

Tewdwr-Jones, M. and Allmendinger, P. (2002) Conclusion: Communicative Planning, Collaborative Planning, and the Post-Positivist Planning Theory Landscape. In Tewdwr-Jones, M. and Allmendinger, P. (Ed) Planning Futures; New Directions for Planning Theory, 206-216. London: Routledge.

Urquhart, G. (2003) Patrick Geddes and the Edinburgh Social Union

Planning - Poverty – Philanthropy., diunduh pada tanggal 16 Oktober 2011

Vangen, S. and Huxham, C. (2003) Enacting Leadership for Collaborative Advantage: Dilemmas of Ideology and Pragmatism in the Activities of Partnership Managers. British Journal of Management 14, 61–76.

Widianingsih, I. (2005) Local Governance, Decentralization and Participatory Planning in Indonesia: Seeking a New Path to a Harmonious Society. Makalah dipresentasikan pada Workshop on Enlarging Citizen Participation and Increasing Local Autonomy in Achieving Societal Harmony Workshop, Network of Asia-Pacific Schools and Institutes of Public Administration and Governance (NAPSIPAG) Annual Conference 2005.

Woltjer, J. (2000) Consensus Planning, The Relevance of Communicative Planning Theory in Dutch Infrastructure Development. Hampshire: Ashgate.


Copyright © 2016 Journal of Regional and City Planning

Creative Commons License
This work licensed under CC-BY-NC, a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Visitor Counter