Comunity Participation in Indonesia Development Policy: Neo-Liberal and Post-Marxism Prespective

Tubagus Furqon Sofhani


The meaning of community participation in Indonesian development history at New Era and Reformation has many been changed. The evolution of the meaning is the implication of the dynamic economic and political changing in Indonesia. It is also the consequence of its interaction with neo-liberal and post-Marxism that is promoted by international development institution and other development actors. Three phases movement of community participation meaning have been identified and analyzed in this paper on discussion in two-development paradigms: neo-liberalism and post-Marxism.

Keywords: community participation, planning process; neo-liberalism, post-marxism

Full Text:



Arnstein, S.R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of American Institute of Planners 35/4, pp. 216-224.

Beard, Victoria A. (2002). Covert planning for social transformation in Indonesia. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22, pp. 15-25.

Beard, Victoria (2003). Learning radical planning: the power of collective action. Planning Theory 2(1), pp. 13-35.

Botes, Lucius, and Dingie Van Rensburg (2000). Community Participation in Development: Nine Plagues and Twelve Commandments. Community Development Journal 25/1. Pp. 41-58.

Brinkerhoff, Derick W (1999). State-civil society networks for policy implementation in Sustainable Livelihood Approaches – an Introduction. Community Development Journal 38/3, pp. 185-198.

Clearver, Frances (1999). Pardoxes of Participation: questioning participatory approaches to development. Journal of International Development 11, pp. 597-612.

Cleaver, Frances (2001). Institutions, agency, and the limitation of participatory approaches to development. In Cooke and Kothari, eds. Participation: The New Tyranny? Zed. London.

Ferrazzim Gabriele (2001). Regional planning reform in Indonesia. Third World Planning Review 23/3, pp. 249-272

Firman, Tommy (2002). Urban development in Indonesia, 1990-2001: from the boom to the early reform era through the crisis. Habitat International 26, pp. 229-249.

Francis, Paul (2001). Participatory development at the World Bank: the primacy of process. In Cooke and Kothari, eds. Participation: The New Tyranny? Zed. London.

Friedman, J (1992). Empowerment: The Politics of Alternative Development. Cambridge: Blackwell

Friedman, J. (1996) Rethinking Poverty: empowerment and citizen’s right, International Social Science Journal, 148(June), pp. 161-172.

Fukuyama, Francis (1993). The end of history and the last man. Avon Books, New York.

Gaventa, John (1998). The scaling up and institutionalization of PRA: Lessons and challenges. In Who changes? Institutionalizing participation in development, edited by James Blackburn and Jeremy Holland. London: Intermediate Technology.

Gittel, Ross, Vidal, Avis (1998). Community Organizing, Building Social Capital as a Development Strategy, Thousand Oaks, California, Sage Publication Inc.

Hickey, Sam (2002). Transnational NGDOS and Participatory Forms of Right-Based Development: Converging With the Local Politics of Citizenship in Cameron. Journal of International Development 14, pp. 841-587.

Lane J. (1996). Non-governmental organizations and participatory development: the concept in theory versus the concept in practice. In Power and Participatory Development: Theory and Practice, Nelson N, Wright S (eds). Intermediate Technology Publication: London

Miraftab, Faranak (2003). The perils of participatory discourse: housing policy in postapartheid South Africa. Journal of Planning Education and Research 22, pp. 226-239.

Mohan, Giles and Kristian Stokke (2000). Participatory Development and Empowerment: the Dangers of Localism. Third World Quarterly 21/2, pp. 247-268.

Mohan, G. (2001). Beyond participation: strategies for deeper empowerment. In Cooke and Kothari, eds. Participation: The New Tyranny? Zed. London.

Nel, Etienne, Tony Binns and Nicole Motteux (2001). Community-based development, non-governmental organizations and social capital in Post-development, non-governmental organizations and social capital in Post-Apartheid South Africa. Geografiska Annaler, 83B.

Nelson, Nici and Susan Wright (1995). “Participation and Power” in Nici Nelson and Susan Wright (eds.) Power and Participatory Development: Theory and Practice. London: Intermediate Technology Publication.

Parfitt, Trevor (2004). The ambiguity of participation: a qualified defence of participatory development. Third World Quarterly 25/3, pp. 537-556.

Peterman, William (2004). Advocacy vs. Collaboration: Comparing Inclusionary Community Planning Models. Community Development Journal 39/3, pp. 266-276

Putnam, Robert D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in the modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Schuurman, Francis J. (2003). Social Capital: the politico – emancipatory potential of a disputed concept. Third World quarterly, 24/6, pp. 991-1010.

Somerviller, P. (1998) Empowerment Through Residence, Housing Studies, 13, pp. 233-257.

Zippay, A. (1995) The Politics of Empowerment, Social Work, 40, pp. 263-268

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2019 Journal of Regional and City Planning