Peran Pemerintah Lokal Dalam Pembangunan Perkotaan di Negara Berkembang
The relation between local government and urban development is dynamic and interactive. It is influenced by multinational relationship and global issues, but most of the impacts of multinational relationships and global issues are directly related to the role of national government and indirectly to the role of local government. Nevertheless, the role of local government in urban development cannot be simply explained by its position relative to the national government. Instead, it encompasses a complex set of behavior (Daland, ed.1969) and associated with other influences in formulating, deciding, and achieving general and specific goals of urban development. According to Sherwood (1969) “… the examination of the role of local government involves more than the structure of reporting or authority relationships. The concept of role is more dynamic, in that it essentially calls for specification of the ways in which the unit will participate in a given system” (Daland, ed.1969).
This the role of local government is open to other influences and interdependence to other roles in a given system. This stand points needs further explanations and answers in both the normative and the empirical sides. As a consequence, the role of local government must deal with the value, the process, and the goals of urban development. In this sense, this paper is concerned with the role of local government in urban development in the context of developing countries.
The role of local government raises both descriptive and normative questions. What does the theory say? Flow can we explain (he urban-national relationship? What the local governments in developing countries do to their urban development? Flow does the local government and its bureaucracy behave? What factors determine the interdependencies between local government and other parties that are involved in urban development? What should the local governments do in a particular political setting? How can we draw the boundaries among roles? In the context of urban development in developing countries, how is power o be shared among roles? In current situation, how are such power distributions reflected in terms of urban activities and resources? What can be learned from those experiences? What are the impacts of what they do? What criteria should he learned in evaluating those impacts? What are the obstacles when they are playing their role?
Based on the literature review, this paper tries to find a critical research question, concerning the role that local governments can play in the future. Are there any factors that can be used to bridge from what was done to describe what should be done in the future?
Bahl, Roy W., and Johannes F. Linn. 1992. Urban Public Finance in Developing Countries. New YorkL Oxford University Press, Inc.
Cheema, Shabbir G., ed. 1993. Urban Management: Policies and Innovations in Developing Countries. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger
Daland, Rober T., ed. 1969. Comparative Urban Research: The Administration and Politics of Cities. California: Sage Publication
Evans, Peter B., et al.eds. 1993 Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge University Press
Ford and Quigley. 1990. Journal of RURDS vol. 1, p. 143
Gosht, Pradip K., ed. 1984. Urban Development in the Third World. Westport, Coonecticut: Greenwood Press
Goldsmith, Mike. 1995. Urban Politics, the State, and Capitalist Society, a chapter in Judge, David; Stoker, Gerry, and Wolman, Harold (eds), 1995. Theories of Urban Politics. London: Sage Publications.
Jakobson, Leo, and Ved. Prakash. eds. 1971. Urbanization and National Development. California: Sage Publications.
Judge, David; Gerry Stoker, and Harold Wolman, eds. 1995. Theories of Urban Politics. London: Sage Publications.
Kasarda, J. and A. Parnell, eds. 1992. Third World Cities: Problems, Politics, and Prospects. California: Sage Publications
Mitra, K., Subrata, eds. 1990. The Post Colonial State in Asia: Dialectics of Politics and Culture. Hertfordshire, Great Britain: Hasvester Wheatsheaf
Richardson, Harry W. 1987. The Cost of Urbanization: A Foru-country Comparison Journal of Economic Development and Cultural Change, vol. 35.
Rondinelli, Dennis, and John Kasarda. 1992. Privatizing Services and Infrastructures, a chapter on Third World Cities: Problems, Politics, and Prospects. California: Sage Publications.
Ruland, Jurgen. 1992. Urban Development in Southeast Asia: Regional Cities and Local Government. Boulder: Westview Press.
Schultz, Ann. 1979. Local Politics and Nation States: Case Studies in Politics and Policy. Santa Barbara, California: Clio Press
So, Alvin Y. 1990. Social Change and Development: Modernization, Dependency, and World-System Theories. California: Sage Publications
Vajpeyi, Dhirendra K., ed. 1990. Local Government and Politics in the Third World: Issues and Trends. New Delhi, India: Heritage Publisher
Walsh, Annmarie Hauck. 1969. The Urban Challenge to Government: An International Comparison of Thirteen Cities. New York: Praeger
Winters, Jeffrey A. 1996. Power in Motion: Capital Mobility and the Indonesian State. Ithaca: Cornell University Press
Wolman, Harold. 1995. Local Government institutions and Democratic Governance, a chapter in Judge, David; Gerry Stoker and Harold Wolman, eds. 1995. Theories of Urban Politics. London: Sage Publications.
World Bank Policy Research Report. 1993. The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and Public Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
World Bank. 1994. Indonesia: Environment and Development. Washington, DC: The World Bank
© 2020 Institut Teknologi Bandung