RESEARCH ON ACOUSTIC LANDSCAPE OF LAKEFRONT TOURISM AREAS: A CASE STUDY OF HANGZHOU CITY, CHINA

Authors

  • SHI JIANREN

Abstract

Urban open spaces are important for improvement in urban living quality. Traditional research on open spaces mainly focuses on spatial forms and visual esthetics to analyze environmental quality, but lacks of adequate consideration regarding acoustic elements. In the field of the acoustic environment, people pay much attention to interior sound quality design and noise pollution. In order to provide a new viewpoint for urban design and to reinforce design methods, herein, the concept of soundscape was introduced. In this survey, the types and the features of lakefront soundscapes, as well as visitors' spatial distribution were observed. 13 pairs of sound and image scenarios were presented to 112 subjects at a tourism city, Hangzhou, China. The sounds and images used were of real settings in lakefront scenic areas. Affective response was measured in terms of pleasure. Through the evaluation on the influence of the interaction between visual and acoustic stimuli on perception of the environment, it is proved that there is a need to identify places where the conservation of the sound environment is essential, due to the drastic impact of the loss of sound quality or its salient informational content on human appreciation, especially in theme spaces, and folk-custom landscapes. Moreover, the coherence between sound and image influences human preferences, since coherent combinations are rated higher than the mean of the component stimuli. As a result, the spatial partition of soundscape is also necessary with the movement of the visual images. Finally, some design guidelines regarding soundscape are proposed with the illustrations of four typical lakefront spots.

Author Biography

SHI JIANREN

College of Tourism, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Xia-sha, Hangzhou City, 310018, P.R. China

References

Augoyard, J. F. (1999). The cricket effect. Which tools for the research on sonic urban ambiences? In Conference on Acoustic Ecology, From Awareness to Action. Karlsson, Stockholm, pp. 1-7.

Carles, J.L., Berna,ldez, F.G., Lucio, J.V. (1992). Audio-visual interactions in soundscape preferences. Landscape Res. 17(2), pp. 52-56.

Carles, J.L., Barrio, I.L., Lucio, J.V. (1999). Sound influence on landscape values.

Landscape and Urban Planning 43 (1999), pp. 191-200

Durmisevic, S. & Sariyildiz, S. (2001). A systematic quality assessment of underground spaces"public transport stations. Cities 18(1), pp. 13-23.

Job, R. F. S. (2001). The impact of soundscape, enviroscape and psychscape on the reaction to noise: implication for evaluation and regulation of noise effects. Noise Control Eng. Journal. 49(3), pp. 120-124.

Kaplan, R. & Herbert, R.J., (1987). Cultural and subcultural comparisons in preferences for natural settings. Landscape and Urban Planning, 14, pp. 161-176.

Lercher, P. & Schulte-Fortkamp, B. (2003). The relevance of soundscape research to the assessment of noise annoyance at the community level. In ICBEN 8th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Raimbault, M., Lavandier, C., and Be'rengier, M. (2003). Sound ambient assessments of urban environments. Appl. Acoust. 64, pp. 1241-1256.

Schafer, M. R. (1969). The New Soundscape. Vienna: Universal Edition.

Schafer, M. R. (1977). The Tuning of the World. New York: Knopf.

Schulte-Fortkamp, B. (2002). The meaning of annoyance in relation to the quality of acoustic environments. Noise and Health 4, pp. 13-28.

Skanberg, A. and Ohrstrom, E. (2002). Adverse health effects in relation to urban residential soundscapes. Journal of Sound and Vibration 250(1), pp. 151-155.

Southwork, M. (1969). The sonic environment of cities. Environment and Behavior 1, pp. 49-70.

Stanners, D., & Bourdeau, P. (1995). Europe's environment. The Dobris Assessment. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.

Susini, P., Misdariis, N., Winsberg, S. and McAdams, S. (1998). Caracterisation perceptive de bruits. Acoustique et Techniques 13, pp. 11-15.

Truax, B. (1978). The Handbook for Acoustic Ecology. Vancouver: A.R.C. Publications.

Viollon, S., Lavandier, C. and Drake, C. (2002). Influence of visual setting on sound ratings in an urban environment. Appl. Acoust. 63, pp. 493-511.

Downloads

How to Cite

JIANREN, S. (2016). RESEARCH ON ACOUSTIC LANDSCAPE OF LAKEFRONT TOURISM AREAS: A CASE STUDY OF HANGZHOU CITY, CHINA. ASEAN Journal on Hospitality and Tourism, 6(2), 93-103. Retrieved from https://journals.itb.ac.id/index.php/ajht/article/view/3414

Issue

Section

Articles