Urban Development and Rural Poverty in Java: A Challenge for Decentralized Local Government

Wilmar Salim

Abstract


The Government of Indonesia has pursued the strategy of dispersed development to address the issue of environmental degradation, to reduce the concentration of development in one major center, in order to achieve a sustainable urban form. The effectiveness of this strategy is being questioned, since the “deconcentration” of development fails to achieve its objective due to the absence of sound implementation tools and the market forces. The expansion of urban areas not only has characterized the development of Java in the last couple decades, bitt at the same time the decrease of rural areas and rural lives are also taking place, that spurs the physical integration process of major urban centers, especially on the northern coast of Java. The consequence of this process to the larger area, that is the rural hinterland, highlights the mega urban region hypothesis. Meanwhile, the issue of poverty also highlights the condition of rural Java, where spatially it has corresponding patterns with the formation of extended metropolitan regions. Recognizing the dual ism of development trajectory and the uneven spatial distribution of development in Java, this paper would argue that the focus of local government policies ought to be directed towards the promotion of rural regional development in order to achieve a balanced development towards its lagging regions. A new strategy needs to be invented along with its implementation framework, with a goal to achieve sustainability in both urban and rural areas. The new form of decentralized local governments could be the basis for promoting the regional network strategy as the framework for sustainable regional development.


Keywords:  decentralization policy, urban development, rural poverty


Full Text:

PDF

References


Adell, G. 1999. Theories and Models od the Peri-Urban Interface: A Changing Conceptual Landscape. Strategic Environmental Planning and Management for the Peri-urban Interface Research Project. London: DPU-UCL.

Biro Pusat Statistik (BPS). 1992. Penduduk Indonesia Hasil Sensus Penduduk Tahun 1990. Jakarta: BPS.

Biro Pusat Statistik (BPS). 2001. Penduduk Indonesia Hasil Sensus Penduduk Tahun 2000. Jakarta: BPS.

Biro Pusat Statistik Jawa Timur. 2004. Number of Poor Households and Poor Population by Regencies/Cities. http://jatim.bps.go.id/

Bird, R & E. R. Rodriguez. 1999. Decentralization and Poverty Alleviation. International Experience and the Case of the Philippines, in Public Administration and Development, vol. 19. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Budiman, A., et al. 1996. Identifikasi Fenomena Wilayah Mega Urban Gerbangketosusila dan Koridor Surabaya – Malang (Identification of Mega Urban Region Phonomenon in Gerbangkertosusila and Surabaya – Malang Corridor). Unpublished thesis. Bandung: Departemen Teknik Planologi ITB.

Dharmapatni, I., and T. Firman. 1995. Problems and challenges of mega-urban region in Indonesia. In T. G. McGee and I. Robinson (eds.), The Mega Urban Regions of Southeast Asia. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

Douglass, M. 1991. Planning for Environmental Sustainability in the Extended Jakarta Metropolitan Region. In N Ginsburg, B. Koppel and T. G. McGee (eds.), The Extended Metropolis: Settlement Transition in Asia. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

Douglass, M., 1998. A regional network strategy for reciprocal rural-urban linkages: An agenda for polivy research with reference to Indonesia. Third World Planning Review, 20 (1): 1 – 33.

Firman, T. 1992. The spatial pattern of urban population growth in Java, 1980-1990. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, v. 28: 95-109.

Firman, T. 1996. Urban development in Bandung metropolitan region: a transformation to a desa-kota region. Third World Planninf Review, v. 1: 1-22.

Firman, T. 2003a. The spatial pattern of population growth in Java, 1990-2000: Continuity and change in extended metropolitan region formation. International Development Planning Review, v. 25(1): 53-66.

Firman, T. 2003b. Potential Impacts of Indonesia’s Fiscal Decentralization Reform on Urban and Regional Development: Towards a New Pattern of Spatial Disparity. Space and Polity, v. 7(3): 247-272.

Forbes, D. 1996. Asian Metropolis: Urbanization and the Southeast Asian City. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

Kartasasmita, G. 1994, Penanggulangan Kemiskinan Melalui Pelaksanaan Inpres Desa Tertinggal (IDT). (Poverty Alleviation through the Presidential Instruction for Underdeveloped Village). Malang: Universitas Brawijaya.

Komite Penanggulangan Kemiskinan. 2004. Data Penduduk Miskin (Data of Poor People). www.komite-pk.org.

McGee, T. G. 1991. The Emergence of desakota regions in Asia. In N. Ginsburg, B. Koppel and T. G. McGe (eds.), The Extended Metropolis: Settlement Transition in Asia. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

Oetomo, A. 2002. Transisi Otonomi Daerah di Indonesia: Dilema Bagi Penataan Ruang Berkelanjutan? (Transition of Regional Autonomy in Indonesia: Dilemmas for Sustainable Spatial Planning?) In Winarso, H. et al (eds.) Pemikiran dan Praktek Perencanaan Dalam Era Transformasi di Indonesia, pp. 95-101, Bandung: Departemen Teknik Planologi ITB.

Suryahadi, A. et al. 2003. Developing a Poverty Map for Indonesia: An Initiary Work in three Provinces, Part 1: Technical Report. Jakarta: SMERU Research Paper.

Zulkaidi, D. 2002. Kepentingan Nasional dan Kepentingan Propinsi Dalam Penataan Ruang. (National and Provincial Interest in Spatial Planning). In Winarso, H. et al (eds.) Pemikiran dan Praktek Perencanaan Dalam Era Transformasi di Indonesia, pp. 79-95. Bandung: Departemen Teknik Planologi ITB.




© 2020 Institut Teknologi Bandung