Hubungan Modal Sosial dan Perencanaan

Agustomi Masik

Abstract


The  metadicipline  nature  of  planning  often  misleads  students  relating  to what is the focus of this field. Questions arise whether a planner should be focusing  on  physical  aspects  or should  also  dealing  with  wider  concern including social and economic aspe cts. This article explores the meaning of planning,  and  assess  role  of  social  aspect  in  planning  especially  social capital  concept.  It  reveals that  planning  and  social  capital are  reciprocal. Applying  interactive  and  collaborative  planning  approaches  based   on communicative  rationality  increase  social  capital  stock.  Conversely,  social capital  has  also   importan t  roles  in  planning  which  are   supporting   for sustainable  development,  contextualizing  framework,  and  guid ing  the direction of  social change, and bridg ing dialogue among disciplines.

Keywords: social capital, planning theory, planning


Full Text:

PDF

References


Alexander, Ernest (1996), After Rationality: Towards a Contingency Theory of Planning, dalam Mandelbaum et.al.eds, (1996), Explorations in Planning Theory, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Jersey.

Almendinger, Philip (2002), Towards a Post-Positivist Typology of Planning Theory, Planning Theory vol 1(1): 77-99, Sage Publication, London

Aza, Muriel, 2001, Social Capital and Microfinance, ADA Dialogue, no 27

Briggs, Xavier de Souza, 2004, Social Capital: Easy Beauty or Meaningful Resource? Journal of American Planning Association, vol. 7 no. 2, Spring 2004.

Brooks, Michael P. 2002, Planning Theory for Practitioners, American Planning Association, Chicago.

Conyers, Diana and Hills, Peter, 1984, An Introduction to Development Planning in The Third World, John Willey & Sons, Brisbane.

Cote, Sylvain, 2001, The Contribution of Human and Social Capital, http:// www.isuma.net diakses tgl. 6-12-2004

Dawkins, Casey J, 2003, Regional Development Theory: Conceptual Foundation, Classic Work, and Recent Development, Journal of Planning Literature, Vol. 18 no. 2

Dempster, M. Beth L, 1998, A Self-Organizing Systems Perspective on Planning For Sustainability, thesis, Chapter 4: Planning Theory, University of Waterloo, Canada, diakses melalui URL: ersserver.uwaterloo.ca/jjkay/grad/bdempster tanggal 21-4-2005

Forester, John, 1989, Planning in The Face of Power, University of California Press, California.

Friedman John, 2003, Why Do Planning Theory?, Planning Theory vol. 2(1): 7-10, Sage Publications, London.

Friedman, John, 1987, Planning in The Public Domain, Princeton University Press, Okford.

Fukuyama, Francis, 2001, Social Capital, Civil Society and Development, Third World Quarterly vol. 22 no.1, 2001

Gaag, Martin van der, 2005, Measurement of individual social capital, F&N Bookservice, Amsterdam

Glaeser, Edward L, 2001, The formation of Social Capital, www.isuma.net diakses tgl. 6-12-2004

Grootaert, Christian, 1998, Social Capital: The Missing Link? Social Capital Initiative Working Paper no.3, http://www.worldbank.org

Light, Ivan, 2004, Social Capital‟s Unique Accessibility, Journal of American Planning Association, Spring 2004.

Lin, Nan, 2001, Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Mandelbaum, Seymour J, et.al. eds (1996), Explorations in Planning Theory, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Jersey.

Mazza, Luigi (1996), Designing a Domain for Planning Theory, dalam Mandelbaum et.al. eds, (1996), Explorations in Planning Theory, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Jersey.

Munir, Risfan, 2002, Merencana di Tengah Jerat Hutang, dalam Winarso, 2002, Pemikiran dan Praktek Perencanaan dalam Era Transformasi di Indonesia, Departemen Teknik Planologi, ITB, Bandung.

Patsy Healey, 1997, Collaborative Planning Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies, Macmillan Press Ltd, London.

Putnam, 2001, Bowling Alone: the Collapse and Revival of American Community, dalam Roy, Van Alison, (2001), Review – Comptes Rendus www.isuma.net diakses tgl 7-12-2004

Putnam, 2004, Using Social Capital to Help Integrate Planning Theory, Research, and Practice, Preface of Journal of American Planning Association, vol. 70 no. 2, Spring, 2004

Rohe, William M, 2004, Building Social Capital Through Community Development, Journal of American Planning Association; vol. 70 no. 2, Spring, 2004.

Sager, Tore, 1993, Paradigm for Planning: A Rationality-Based Classification, Planning Theory, 9.

Sandercock, Leoni, 1998, Towards Cosmopolis: Planning for Multicultural Cities, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Brisbane

Serageldin, 2000, Foreword pada social Capital Initiative Working Papers, http://www.worldbank.org/socialdevelopment

Taylor, Nigel, 1998, Urban Planning Theory Since 1945, Sage Publications, London

Widiarto, 2004, Peran Perencana Dari Perspektif Teori Perencanaan, Paper disampaikan pada Seminar Peran Perencanaan Dalam Proses Perumusan Kebijakan di Era Pasca Transformasi tanggal 28 Oktober 2004 di Bandung

Woolcock, Michael and Narayan, Deepa, 2000, Social Capital: Implications for Development Theory, Research, and Policy, The World Bank Research Observer Vol. 15(2), 2000.

Woolcock, Michael, 2004, Why and How Planners Should Take Social Capital Seriously, Journal of American Planning Association, vol. 70 no.2, spring 2004.




Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2019 Journal of Regional and City Planning