Analysis of Faecal Sludge Treatment Alternatives to Enhance the Treatment Performance of Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Denpasar Sewerage Development Project (DSDP) Suwung Denpasar City

Authors

  • Gede Adi Wiguna Sudiartha Environmental Engineering Study Programme, Faculty of Engineering, Udayana University, Jalan Raya Kampus Unud, Jimbaran, Badung 80361, Bali, Indonesia
  • Prayatni Soewondo Environmental Engineering Study Programme, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jalan Ganesa No. 10, Bandung 40132, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2021.53.6.3

Abstract

Most of the wastewater generated from domestic activities in Denpasar city is treated in an off-site treatment plant located in WWTP DSDP Suwung. This includes faecal sludge that originates from on-site treatment plants. The existing treatment facilities can only treat wastewater that has a maximum biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) concentration of around 225 mg/l while the disposed faecal sludge?s BOD concentration reaches 3,394 mg/l. Therefore, an additional faecal sludge treatment plant needs to be established in order to separate the solid phase from the liquid phase. According to the treatment performance calculation, some alternative treatments can achieve BOD5 and TSS removal of up to 97% and 98% respectively. The selection of the alternative treatment was decided from weighting results of several aspects, such as economic, land use, technological and environmental aspects. The weighting method that was used in this research was Simple Additive Weighting (SAW). The advantage of SAW is its ability to do the assessment highly precisely because it is based on predetermined criteria and preference weights. Based on the weighting result, the treatment technology selected was a Solid Separation Chamber as primary treatment, combined with an Anaerobic Baffled Reactor as a secondary treatment. A Belt Filter-Press was applied to reshape the sludge into a recyclable cake. The required cost is approximately 16 billion rupiahs.

References

Republic Indonesia?s Centre of Statistics Bureau, Population Census Results 2020.

World Bank, Indonesia?s Urban Story, World Bank, http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2016/06/14/indonesia-urbanstory, (12 November 2020).

Republic Indonesia, Ministry of Environmental and Forestry Law Number 68/ 2016 Concerning Domestic Wastewater Effluent Standard, 2016. (Text in Indonesian)

Tchobanoglous, G. & Metcalf, E., Wastewater Engineering Treatment: Treatment, Disposal, and Reuse, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, 2004.

Abfertiawan, M.S., Bao P.N., Pahilda, W.R. & Hakim, F.B., Existing Condition Study of Denpasar On-site Domestic Wastewater, Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan, 17(3), pp. 443-451, 2019. (Text in Indonesian)

Mallory, A., Holm, R. & Parker, A., A Review of the Financial Value of Faecal Sludge Reuse in Low-Income Countries, Sustainability, 12, 8334, 2020.

Strande, L., Ronteltap, M. & Brdjanovic, D., Faecal Sludge Management, London: IWA Publishing, United Kingdom, 2009.

Department of Public Works, Technical Guideline No. CT/AL/Op-TC/003/98 about Operating and Maintenance of Faecal Sludge Treatment, Jakarta, 1998.

Vitraha Consultindo, Final Report of the Technical Design and Detailed Engineering Design of Faecal Sludge Treatment Plant Denpasar City, Denpasar, 2014. (Text in Indonesian)

United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Guide to Septage Treatment and Disposal, EPA Office of Research and Development, Washington, D.C. EPA/625/R-94/002, 1994.

Kon D. & Strauss, M., Low-cost Options for Treating Faecal Sludges (FS) in Developing Countries, 6th International IWA Specialist Group Conference on Waste Stabilisation Ponds, Avignon. France, 27th Sept. ? 1st Oct., 2004.

National Water and Sewerage Corporation (NWSC), Kampala Sanitation Program (KSP) ? Feasibility Study for Sanitation Master in Kampala, Kampala, Uganda, 2008.

Heinss, U., Larmie, S. & Strauss, M., Solid Separation and Ponding Systems for the Treatment of Faecal Sludge in The Tropics, ed. 2, Duebendorf, EAWAG Inc., Switzerland, 1998.

Centre of Statistics Bureau, Badung in Numbers, Kabupaten Badung, 2015. (Text in Indonesian)

Centre of Statistics Bureau, Denpasar in Numbers, Denpasar City, 2015. (Text in Indonesian)

Haswan, F., Decision Support System for Election of Members Unit Patients Pamong Praja, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 1(1), pp. 21-25, June 2017. (Text in Indonesian)

Dede, W.T.P. & Adrian, A.P., Comparison Analysis of Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Weighted Product (WP) in Decision Support System, MATEC Web of Conferences, 215, 01003, 2018.

Reynolds, T.D. & Richards, P., Unit Operation and Processes in Environmental Engineering, Belmont: Wadsworth, Inc. 1996.

Mainardis, M., Buttazzoni, M. & Goi, D., Up-flow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) Technology for Energy Recovery: A Review on State-of-the-Art and Recent Technological Advances, Bioengineering (Basel), 7(2) pp. 43, 2020.

Ramires, R.D. & Oliveira, R.A.D., COD, TSS, Nutrients and Coliforms Removals in UASB Reactors in Two Stages Treating Swine Wastewater, Engenharia Agricola, Jaboticabal, 34(6), pp. 1256-1269, Dec. 2014.

Hidayat, H., Sasmita, A. & Reza, M., Design Development of a Sludge Treatment Plant (IPLT) in Tampan District, Pekanbaru City, Jom FTEKNIK, 4(1), 15063, Februari 2017. (Text in Indonesian)

Wulandari, D. & Herumurti, W., Separation of Sludge Solids in the Solid Separation Chamber (SSC) Unit, Jurnal Purifikasi, 17(2), pp. 87-93, December 2017.

Aqaneghad, M., Moussavi, M. & Ghanbari, R., Anaerobic Baffled Reactor and Hybrid Anaerobic Baffled Reactor Performances Evaluation in Municipal Wastewater Treatment, Iranian Journal of Health, Safety & Environment, 5(3), pp. 1027-1034, October 2017.

U.S. EPA, Principles of Design and Operations of Wastewater Treatment Pond Systems for Plant Operators, Engineers, and Managers, EPA/600/R-11/088, published by United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S.), 2011.

Tilley, E., Ulrich, L., Reymond, P., Luethi, C. & Zurbruegg, C., Compendium of Sanitation Systems and Technologies, Swiss Agency for Development Cooperation SDC, ed. 2, 2014.

Punmia, B.C. & Jain, A.K., Environmental Engineering Waste Water Engineering (Including Air Pollution), 2nd ed., Laxmi Publications (P) Ltd., 1998.

Lim, S.J. & Kim, T.H., Applicability and Trends of Anaerobic Granular Sludge Treatment Processes, Biomass Bioenergy, 60, pp. 189-202, 2014.

Hansen, C.L. & Cheong, D.Y., Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket Reactor, Handbook of Waste Management and Co-Product Recovery in Food Processing, 1, 2007.

Gaby, D. & Herumurti, W., Performance Evaluation of Keputih Sludge Treatment Plant (IPLT), Jurnal Teknik ITS, 5(1), pp. 2301-9271, 2016. (Text in Indonesian)

Barber, W.P. & Stuckey, D.C., The Use of the Anaerobic Baffled Reactor (ABR) for Wastewater Treatment: A Review, Water Res., 33, pp. 1559-1578, 1999.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-17

Issue

Section

Articles