Influence of Impregnation and Coprecipitation Method in Preparation of Cu/ZnO Catalyst for Methanol Synthesis


  • Yusi Prasetyaningsih Department of Chemical Engineering, Politeknik TEDC Bandung, Jalan Politeknik ?? Pesantren Km 2 Cibabat ?? Cimahi Utara
  • Hendriyana Hendriyana Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, UNJANI, Jalan Ters. Jend. Sudirman, Cimahi,
  • Herri Susanto Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jalan Ganesha No. 10, Bandung 40132,



Cu/ZnO catalyst was succesfully prepared using a coprecipitation method. The mixing procedure of the Cu(NO3)2, Zn(NO3)2 and Na2CO3 solutions had an important influence on the characteristics of the catalyst. The best catalyst obtained was the one prepared with slow mixing of the salt solutions and a CuO/ZnO molar ratio of 50:50. This raw catalyst had a maximum surface area of about 61.6 m2/g. Increasing the CuO/ZnO molar ratio caused an agglomeration of precipitated particles, reducing the surface area. A much better catalyst was obtained using an impregnation method, in which g-Al2O3 was used as support. The impregnated catalyst had a surface area of about 151 m2/g. Activity tests were carried out in a fixed-bed reactor containing 1 g of catalyst and a flow of syngas at a rate of 60 mL/min. The reaction temperature was 170C and the pressure was 20 barg. The best coprecipitated catalyst gave a CO conversion of about 10%, while the impregnated catalyst gave a CO conversion of up to 69%.


Download data is not yet available.


Lange, J.P., Methanol Synthesis: a Short Review of Technology Improvements, Catalysis Today, 64, pp. 3-8, 2001.

Baltes, C., Vukojevic, V. & Schuth, F., Correlations between Synthesis, Precursor, and Catalyst Structure and Activity of a Large Set of CuO/ZnO/Al2O3 Catalyst for Methanol Synthesis, Journal of Catalyst, 258, pp. 334-344, 2008.

Reubroycharoen, P., Tetsuji, Y., Yoneyama, Y., Vitidsant, T. & Tsubaki, N., A New Low-Temperature Methanol Synthesis from Low-Grade Syngas, Prepr. Pap.-Am. Chem. Soc., Div. Fuel Chem., 49(2), p. 708, 2004.

Bahrens, M., Zander, S., Kurr, P., Jacobansen, N., Senker, J., Koch, G., Ressler, T., Fischer, R.W. & Schlogl, R., Performance Improvement of Nanocatalyst by Promotor-induced Defect in the Support Material: Methanol Synthesis over Cu/ZnO:Al, Journal of American Chemical Society, 135(16), pp. 6061-6068, 2013.

Fang, D., Liu, Z., Meng, S., Wang, L., Xu, L. & Wang, H., Influence of Aging Time on the Properties of Precursors of CuO/ZnO Catalysts for Methanol Synthesis, Journal of Natural Gas Chemistry, 14, pp. 107-114, 2005.

Farahania, B.V., Rajabia, F.H., Bahmani, M., Ghelichkhani, M. & Sahebdelfar, S., Influence of Precipitation Conditions on Precursor Particle Size Distribution and Activity of Cu/ZnO Methanol Synthesis Catalyst, Applied Catalysis A: General, 482, pp. 237-244, 2014.

Ertl, G., Knozinger, H. & Weitkamp, J., Preparation of Solid Catalysts, Wiley-VCH, 1999.

Bennekom, J.G.v., Venderbosch, R.H., Winkelman, J.G.M.,Wilbers, E., Assink, D., Lemmens, K.P.J. & Heeres, H.J., Methanol Synthesis beyond Chemical Equilibrium, Chemical Engineering Science, 87, pp. 204-208, 2013.




How to Cite

Prasetyaningsih, Y., Hendriyana, H., & Susanto, H. (2016). Influence of Impregnation and Coprecipitation Method in Preparation of Cu/ZnO Catalyst for Methanol Synthesis. Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences, 48(4), 442-450.