Guidelines for Process Safety Hazard Assessment Based on Process Information

Authors

  • Muhammad Firdaus Husin Department of Chemical Engineering /Centre of Hydrogen Energy, Faculty of Chemical and Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Bahru, Johor,
  • Mimi H. Hassim Department of Chemical Engineering /Centre of Hydrogen Energy, Faculty of Chemical and Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Bahru, Johor,
  • Denny K. S. Ng Department of Chemical & Environmental Engineering/Centre of Excellence for Green Tecjnologies, University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
  • Anwar Johari Department of Chemical Engineering /Centre of Hydrogen Energy, Faculty of Chemical and Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Bahru, Johor,
  • Mohd. Johari Kamaruddin Department of Chemical Engineering /Centre of Hydrogen Energy, Faculty of Chemical and Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Bahru, Johor,
  • Norzita Ngadi Department of Chemical Engineering /Centre of Hydrogen Energy, Faculty of Chemical and Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Bahru, Johor,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2018.50.2.8

Keywords:

chemical processes, hazard and risk assessment, piping and instrumentation diagram (P&ID), process safety, systematic framework

Abstract

In any new chemical process development and design, process safety is a critical aspect to be considered besides economic and technical feasibility of the manufacture of the product. A lack of proper hazard assessment during the design phase may later result in accidents with disastrous consequences to workers, the public as well as the environment. Many methods have been introduced to qualitatively and quantitatively assess the safety level of processes. Despite the availability of a large amount of methods, a systematic framework that details guidelines for hazard identification, risk assessment, safety measure design, and safe critical decision-making is still missing. To address this issue, the main objective of this study was to propose a systematic framework that outlines comprehensive guidelines for assessing the safety performance of processes based on information from the piping and instrumentation diagram (P&ID). Apart from proposing the framework, appropriate strategies for minimizing safety hazards and risks are also recommended. In addition, the user is assisted in selecting the most appropriate assessment method according to his or her needs and the scope and constraints of the assessment. A case study is presented to illustrate the application of the proposed framework.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Muhammad Firdaus Husin, Department of Chemical Engineering /Centre of Hydrogen Energy, Faculty of Chemical and Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Bahru, Johor,

Postgraduate Student

Department of Centre of Hydrogen 

Chemical and Energy Engineering

References

Mannan, M.S., Sachdeva, S., Chen, H., Reyes-Valdes, O., Liu, Y. & Laboureur, D.M., Trends and Challenges in Process Safety, AIChE Journal, 61(11), pp. 3558-3569, 2015.

Kidam, K., Sahak, H.A., Hassim, M.H., Shahlan, S.S. & Hurme, M., Inherently Safer Design Review and Their Timing during Chemical Process Development and Design, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 42, pp. 47-58, 2016.

Kletz, T.A. & Amyotte, P., Process Plant: A Handbook for Inherently Safer Design, (Second Edition), 2010.

Taylor, J.R., Understanding and Combating Design Error in Process Plant Design, Safety Science, 45(1-2), pp. 75-105, 2007.

Shariff, A.M. & Leong, C.T., Inherent Risk Assessment - A New Concept to Evaluate Risk in Preliminary Design Stage, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 87(6), pp. 371-376, 2009.

Khan, F.I. & Abbasi, S., Multivariate Hazard Identification and Ranking System, Process Safety Progress, 17(3), pp. 157-170, 1998.

Turton, R., Bailie, R.C., Whiting, W.B. & Shaeiwitz, J.A., Analysis, Synthesis and Design of Chemical Processes, Pearson Education, 2008.

Khan, F., Rathnayaka, S. & Ahmed, S., Methods and Models in Process Safety and Risk Management: Past, Present and Future, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 98, pp. 116-147, 2015.

Khan, F.I. & Abbasi, S.A., Techniques and Methodologies for Risk Analysis in Chemical Process Industries. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 11(4), pp. 261-277, 1998.

Etowa, C.B., Amyotte, P.R., Pegg, M.J. & Khan, F.I., Quantification of Inherent Safety Aspects of the Dow Indices, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 15(6), pp. 477-487, 2002.

Khan, F.I., Husain, T. & Abassi, S.A., Safety Weighted Hazard Index (Swehi) A New, User Friendly Tool for Swift yet Comprehensive Hazard Identification and Safety Evaluation in Chemical Process Industries. Trans IChemE, 79, 2001.

Khan, F.I. & Amyotte, P.R., Integrated Inherent Safety Index (I2SI): A Tool for Inherent Safety Evaluation, Process Safety Progress, 23(2), pp. 136-148, 2004.

Crowl, D.A. & Louvar, J.F., Chemical Process Safety: Fundamentals with Applications, Pearson Education, 2001.

Kister, H.Z., What Caused Tower Malfunctions in the Last 50 Years? Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 81(1), pp. 5-26, 2003.

Amyotte, P.R., Berger, S., Edwards, D.W., Gupta, J.P., Hendershot, D.C., Khan, F.I., Mannan, M.S. & Willey, R.J., Why Major Accidents are still Occurring, Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 14, pp. 1-8, 2016.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-29

How to Cite

Husin, M. F., Hassim, M. H., Ng, D. K. S., Johari, A., Kamaruddin, M. J., & Ngadi, N. (2018). Guidelines for Process Safety Hazard Assessment Based on Process Information. Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences, 50(2), 272-290. https://doi.org/10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2018.50.2.8

Issue

Section

Articles