Investigation of Shear Stud Performance in Flat Plate Using Finite Element Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2014.46.3.7Abstract
Three types of shear stud arrangement, respectively featuring an orthogonal, a radial and a critical perimeter pattern, were evaluated numerically. A numerical investigation was conducted using the finite element software ABAQUS to evaluate their ability to resist punching shear in a flat plate. The finite element analysis here is an application of the nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete structures using three-dimensional solid finite elements. The nonlinear characteristics of concrete were achieved by employing the concrete damaged plasticity model in the finite element program. Transverse shear stress was evaluated using finite element analysis in terms of shear stress distribution for flat plate with and without shear stud reinforcement. The model predicted that shear studs placed along the critical perimeter are more effective compared to orthogonal and radial patterns.Downloads
References
Plain and Reinforced Concrete-Code of Practice, IS 456:2000, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India, 2000.
Marzouk, H. & Jiang, D., Finite Element Evaluation of Shear Enhancement of High Strength Concrete Plate, ACI Structural Journal, 93, pp. 667-673, 1996.
Joint ACI-ASCE Committee 421, Shear Reinforcement for Slabs (ACI421.1R-99), American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA, 1999.
Lubliner, J., Oliver, J., Oller, S. & Onate, E., A Plastic-Damage Model for Concrete, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 25(3), pp. 229-326, 1989.
Vermeer, P.A. & de Borst, R., Non-Associated for Soils, Concrete and Rock, Delft University of Technology, Heron, 1984.
ABAQUS Manual,Example Problems, Verification Manual (Version 6.5), DassaultSystmesSimulia Corp., Providence, RI, USA, 2005.
Xiao, R.Y. & Flaherty., T.O., Finite-Element Analysis of Tested Concrete Connections, Computers and Structures, 78, pp. 247-255, 2000.
Broms, C.E., Ductility of Flat Plates: Comparison of Shear Reinforcement Systems, ACI Structural Journal, 104(6), pp. 703-711, 2007.
ACI Committee 318, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318M-05) and Commentary, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA, 2005.
Joint CEB-FIP Committee, Model Code 90, CEB Bulletin, No. 213-214, Lausanne, Switzerland, pp. 437, 1993.
Eurocode 2, Design of Concrete Structures, Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings, European Standards, CEN, EN1992-1-1, Brussels, Belgium, pp. 225, 2004.
.png){kind=logo}
