Rethinking Slum Planning: A Comparative Study of Slum Upgrading Projects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5614/jpwk.2020.31.1.1Keywords:
perspective, planning, planning approach, planning orientation, slumAbstract
The stigma slums have of being an urban problem is influenced by theoretical and empirical knowledge. This article reports a comparative study on the failure and success of slum upgrading projects in the Gecekondu slum area in Ankara, Turkey and the Semanggi slum area in Surakarta, Indonesia. In both cases there were different orientations and approaches in planning influenced by the perspective on slums. Related to the result of the study, this article offers at least three key perspectives to understand slums in the context of urban planning. Slum upgrading projects are not always about space formalization, physical improvement, or economic enhancement. Slum upgrading projects are also about community empowerment and social transformation contributing to urban development. The success of a slum upgrading project depends on the approach and perspective toward these urban issues within the local context. Different methods and focuses could result in different outcomes of the project. As such, those differences should be taken into account in the planning process.
Abstrak. Stigma permukiman kumuh sebagai masalah perkotaan dapat dipengaruhi oleh pengetahuan yang bersumber dari teori dan pengetahuan empiris. Artikel ini adalah studi komparatif yang mencoba menggambarkan kegagalan dan keberhasilan proyek peningkatan permukiman kumuh dalam kasus daerah kumuh Gecekondu di Ankara, Turki dan daerah kumuh Semanggi di Surakarta, Indonesia. Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa ada berbagai orientasi dan pendekatan dalam perencanaan. Perbedaan-perbedaan ini dipengaruhi oleh perspektif terhadap kumuh dalam perencanaan. Terkait dengan hasilnya, artikel ini menawarkan setidaknya tiga perspektif kunci untuk memahami daerah kumuh dalam konteks perencanaan kota. Proyek peningkatan permukiman kumuh tidak selalu tentang formalisasi ruang, peningkatan fisik atau peningkatan ekonomi. Selain itu, proyek perbaikan permukiman kumuh adalah tentang pemberdayaan masyarakat dan transformasi sosial yang berkontribusi terhadap pembangunan perkotaan. Keberhasilan proyek peningkatan permukiman kumuh tergantung pada pendekatan dan perspektif konteks lokal terhadap masalah perkotaan ini. Berbagai metode dan fokus dapat menghasilkan berbagai hasil proyek. Dengan demikian, perbedaan-perbedaan tersebut harus diperhitungkan dalam proses perencanaan.
Kata kunci. Perspektif, perencanaan, pendekatan perencanaan, orientasi perencanaan, daerah kumuh.
Downloads
References
Alsayyad, N. (2004) Urban Informality as a "New" Way of Life. In Urban Informality: Transnational Perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia, 7-30.
Barquero, A.V. (2006) Endogenous Development: Networking, Innovation, Institutions and Cities. Routledge.
Bourdieu, P. (1986) The Forms of Capital. Cultural Theory: An Anthology, 81-93.
Durand-lasserve, A. and L. Royston (1998) Holding Their Ground: Secure Land Tenure for the Urban Poor in Developing Countries. Earthscan Publications Ltd.
Erman, T. (2016) Formalization by the State, Re-Informalization by the People: A Gecekondu Transformation Housing Estate as Site of Multiple Discrepancies. International Journal of Urban and Regional Reaserch 40(109), 425-440. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12349
Fukuyama, F. (1995) Trust: The Social Virtues and The Creation of Prosperity. Free Press Paperbacks.
Hague, C., E. Hague, and C. Breitbach (2011) Regional and Local Economic Development. Palgrave Macmillan.
Ibrahim, L.D. (2006) Memanfaatkan modal sosial komunitas lokal dalam program kepedulian korporasi. Jurnal Filantropi dan Masyarakat Madani GALANG 1(2), 19-28.
Katerji, S. and M. Ozaka, (2015) Urban Transformation as a Process for Inner-City Slums in Turkey, The Experience of Gaziantep City. Artium 3(2), 22-36.
Kuyucu, T. (2014) Law, Property and Ambiguity: The Uses and Abuses of Legal Ambiguity in Remaking Istanbul's Informal Settlements, 38(March), 609-627. https://doi.org/10.1111/ 1468-2427.12026
Lefebvre, H. (2003) The Urban Revolution. University of Minnesota Press.
Lyon, L., & R. Driskell (2011) The Community in Urban Society: Second Edition. Waveland Press, Inc.
Mukhija, V. (2000) Squatters as Developers? Mumbai's Slum Dwellers as Equity Partners in Redevelopment. Massachusetts Institut of Technology.
Musthofa, Z. (2011) Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Program Relokasi Permukiman Kumuh ( Studi Kasus: Program Relokasi Permukiman Di Kelurahan Pucangsawit Kecamatan Jebres Kota Surakarta ). Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta.
Putnam, R.D. (1993) The Prosperous Community. The American Prospect 4(13), 35-42.
Rogers, E.M. (2010) Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Roy, A. (2005) Urban Informality. Journal of the American Planning Association 71(2), 147-158.
Roy, A. (2009) Planning Theory. Planning Theory 71(2), 147-158. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1473095208099299
Srinivas, H. (2005) Defining Squatter Settlements. Global Development Research Center Web site. Retrieved from http://www.gdrc.org/uem/squatters/define-squatter.html
Stimson, R.J., R.R. Stough, and B.H. Roberts (2006) Regional Economic Development: Analysis and Planning Strategy. New York: Springer Science and Business Media.
Stimson, R.J., R.R. Stough, and M. Salazar (2009) Leadership and Institutions in Regional Endogenous Development. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Vale, L.J. (2018) Cities of Stars: Urban Renewal, Public Housing Regeneration, and The Community Empowerment Possibility of Governance Constellations. International Journal of Urban Sciences 22(4), 431-460.
Viratkapan, V. and R. Perera (2006) Slum Relocation Projects In Bangkok: What Has Contributed to Their Success or Failure? Habitat International 30(1), 157-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2004.09.002
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Manuscript submitted to JRCP has to be an original work of the author(s), contains no element of plagiarism, and has never been published or is not being considered for publication in other journals. The author(s) retain the copyright of the content published in JRCP. There is no need for request or consultation for future re-use and re-publication of the content as long as the author and the source are cited properly.