Kampung Taman?s Corridor Structure Investigation: A Territorial Analysis by Using a Snapshot Method

Authors

  • Fermanto Lianto Department of Architecture, Universitas Tarumanagara, Jl. Letjen S. Parman No. 1, Jakarta Barat 11440
  • Rudy Trisno Department of Architecture, Universitas Tarumanagara, Jl. Letjen S. Parman No. 1, Jakarta Barat 11440,
  • Denny Husin Department of Architecture, Universitas Tarumanagara, Jl. Letjen S. Parman No. 1, Jakarta Barat 11440,
  • Clinton Tedyardi Department of Architecture and Urban Design (Projective Cities), Architectural Association School of Architecture, 36 Bedford Square, London WC1B3ES, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5614/jpwk.2022.33.1.4

Keywords:

Corridor Structure, Investigation, Kampung, Territory, Urban

Abstract

Communality is prime in kampungs; the phenomenon of collective activities in kampungs is reflected in their structure, especially in the network of corridors, i.e., the in-between spaces that are the topic of this research. This research explored territorial analysis by converting photographs into architectural mapping diagrams and photo-collages using the snapshot method. The diagrams were produced to highlight the collective structure and the actual processes of communality. The physical structure was investigated as a medium to accommodate everyday activities in Kampung Taman, Yogyakarta, presenting a territorial analysis with respect to: a) implementation/execution, including activities, expressions, spaces, and joint structures; b) circulation; and c) dynamic phenomena occurring in Kampung Taman. The investigation illustrates a territorial implementation involving the physical structure of Kampung Taman?s corridor network and the user?s interpretation of space when conducting communal activities. This involves sharing social, communal, and public spaces. The territorial activities that affect the Kampung?s physical structure were tracked. The novelty is the discovery of spatial patterns that suggest organic development of the corridor network, as illustrated by a compilation of diagrams composed of strong examples captured directly on-site from Augustus 2018 to November 2020.

References

Altman, I. (1975). Environment and Social Behavior: Privacy, Personal Space, Territory, and Crowding. Monterey: Brooks Cole.

Aurora, S. (2014). Territory and Subjectivity: The Philosophical Nomadism of Deleuze and Canetti. Minerva ? An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 18(1-26). Retrieved from http://www.minerva.mic.ul.ie/Vol18/Territory.pdf

Delaney, D. (2005). Territory: A Short Introduction. UK: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3732/b8d703a64d7b317474e9b378a05920dbb24b.pdf

Edney, J. J. (1976). Human Territories: Comment on Functional Properties. Environment and Behavior, 8(1), 31-47. doi:10.1177/001391657600800103

Flanagan, K., Georghiou, L., and Halfpenny, P. (2000). Research Equipment Needs in UK Universities: A Snapshot Study. UK: PREST. Retrieved from https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/files/35316145/FULL_TEXT.PDF

Haryadi, & Setiawan, B. (2010). Arsitektur Lingkungan dan Perilaku. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Heidegger, M. (1971). Building Dwelling Thinking. In Poetry, Language, and Thought. (Originally ?Bauen Wohnen Denken?, in Vortre und Aufsze. Pfullingen: Neske, 1954). New York: Harper & Row.

Holahan, C. J. (1982). Environmental Psychology. New York: Random House.

Lianto, F., and Dwisusanto, Y. B. (2015, November). Teritorialitas dan Keamanan Penghuni Pada Permukiman Horisontal dan Vertikal (Rumah Susun Sederhana) (Studi Kasus: Rumah Susun Sederhana Sewa (Rusunawa) Bumi Cengkareng Indah , Jakarta ). Jurnal Sosek Pekerjaan Umum, 7(3), 219 - 227. Retrieved from http://jurnalsosekpu.pu.go.id/index.php/sosekpu/article/view/53

Lianto, F., Arifin, L. S., and Dwisusanto, Y. B. (2017). Role of Corridor in Territorial Meaning Formation in ?Owned Low-cost Apartments? (?Rusunami?) Bidara Cina, Jakarta, Indonesia. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 7(2), 399-405. Retrieved from http://ijaseit.insightsociety.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9&Itemid=1&article_id=2095

Lyman, S. M., & Scott, M. B. (1967). Territoriality: A Neglected Sociological Dimension. Social Problems, 15(2), 236-249. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/799516

Maharika, I. F. (2016). Architecture of Kampung?s Abstract Machine. Tokyo Academic Program Conference (pp. 667-671). Tokyo: UIA 2011.

Maliki, N., Abdullah, A., and Baharuddin, A. (2015). Recalling the Transitional Space: City Home and Kampung Home. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 170, 605-612. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.062

Newman, O. (1972 b). Defensible Space: Crime Prevention Through Urban Design. New York: Macmillan.

Partridge, E. (2006). Origins - A Short Etymological Dictionary of Modern English. London & New York: Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.bulgari-istoria-2010.com/Rechnici/An_Etymological_Dictionary_of_Modern_English.pdf

Rolalisasi, A., Santosa. H., and Soemarno, I. (2013). Social capital of urban settlement. Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, 2(3), 83-88. doi:10.11648/j.pbs.20130203.11

Salura, P. (2001). Ber-arsitektur; Membuat, Menggunakan, Mengalami dan Memahami Arsitektur. Bandung: Architecture & Communication.

Schilders, P. (2010). The Organic City: method or metaphor? The Meaning of ?Organic? in Architecture and Urban Planning. Almere: INTI. Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/document/266289687/PDF-INTI-TheOrganicCity-Screen

Schulz, C. N. (1988). Architecture; Meaning and Place. New York: Rizzoli.

Skaburkis, J. V. (1974). Territoriality and Its Relevance to Neighborhood Design: A Review. Architectural Research and Teaching, 3(1), 39-44.

Sommer, R. (1969). Personal Space: The Behavioral Basis of Design. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Sommer, R., & Becker, F. D. (1969). Territorial Defense and The Good Neighbor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 85-92.

Downloads

Published

2022-05-10

Issue

Section

Research Articles