A Consensus Model for Coastal Potential- Conflict Management: The Case of Pangkung Tibah Village, Bali
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5614/jpwk.2023.34.3.4Keywords:
coastal conflicts, community participation, consensus model, management of potential conflicts, participatory approachAbstract
The tourism development of the Pangkung Tibah Village coastal area has reportedly caused various changes in the functions of lands. These changes have led to potential conflicts among the involved actors, who have different interests, indicating the necessity for problem-solving efforts. Potential conflicts should be addressed early to prevent them from developing into bigger conflicts. The results of this study may be used as a guideline for developing policies to prevent potential conflicts. The study aimed to: (1) identify the characteristics of the potential conflicts in the Pangkung Tibah Village coastal area, (2) carry out an analytical mapping of the potential conflicts, and (3) formulate a consensus model for the management of the potential conflicts by maximizing the role of the local community. The participatory rural appraisal (PRA) approach was used to identify and conduct an analytical mapping of potential conflicts in the Pangkung Tibah Village coastal area. The findings revealed that due to the vulnerability of this coastal area to damages, interventions should be controlled by direct action that is supported by formal and customary laws. Regarding the identification of the actors, causes, and types of differences in this study, an analytical mapping was conducted, with the potential conflicts being categorized into three levels: ?mild?, ?moderate?, and ?severe?. These levels were determined based on the nature of their relationships with the three categories of sustainable development. In conclusion, a consensus model is proposed as a solution to manage the existing potential conflicts in the coastal area of Pangkung Tibah Village based on the local community and stakeholders? participation in order to well manage the social, economic, and environmental aspects towards sustainable development.
Downloads
References
Alam, A., and S. Ihsan (2012) Role of Participatory Rural Appraisal in Community Development (A Case Study of Barani Area Development Project in Agriculture, Live Stock and Forestry Development in Kohat). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 2(8), 25.
Almeida, J., Costa, C., and da Silva, F. N. (2017) A framework for conflict analysis in spatial planning for tourism. Tourism Management Perspectives, 24, 94-106.
Brown, G. and Raymond, C.M. (2014) Methods for Identifying Land Participatory Mapping. Landscape and Urban Planning, 122, 196-208.
Brody, S. D., Godschalk, D. R., and Burby, R. J. (2003) Mandating citizen participation in plan making: Six strategic planning choices. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(3), 245-264
Cadith, J. (2019) Konflik dalam Pemanfaatan Sumber Daya di Pesisir Teluk Banten. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 10(2).
Camus, P. (2019) Environmental Conflict and Exploitation in the Coastal Areas of Chile. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Latin American History.
Cavestro, L. (2003) PRA-Participatory Rural Appraisal Concepts Methodologies and Techniques. Padova University. Padova PD. Italia.
Cheung, C.-k., and Leung, K.-k. (2007) Enhancing Life Satisfaction by Government Accountability in China. Social Indicators Research, 82(3), 411-432.
Dinata, A. I. (2013) Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Musyawarah Perencanaan Pembangunan Kota Binjai Tahun 2013. Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Dobbs, L., and Moore, C. (2002) Engaging Communities in Area-based Regeneration: The Role of Participatory Evaluation. Policy Studies, 23(3), 157-171.
Dronkers, J., and Stojanovic, T. (2016) Socio-economic impacts?Coastal management and governance. In North Sea Region Climate Change Assessment (pp. 475-488). Springer, Cham.
Ernoul, L. (2010). Combining Process and Output Indicators to Evaluate Participation and Sustainability in Integrated Coastal Zone Management Projects. Ocean & Coastal Management, 53(11), 711-716. IAP2 Public Participation Spectrum. www.iap2.org.au/resources/spectrum
Kalibo, H.W., and K.E. Medley (2007) Participatory Resource Mapping for Adaptive Collaborative Management at Mt. Kasigau, Kenya. Landscape and Urban Planning, 82(3), 145-158.
Kay, R., and Alder, J. (2017) Coastal Planning and Management. CRC Press.
Kenny, A., Hyett, N., Sawtell, J., et al. (2013) Community participation in rural health: a scoping review. BMC Health Service Research, 13, 64.
Kumar, S. (2002) Methods for Community Participation A Complete Guide for Practitioners. New Delhi: Vistaar Publications.
Lin, D., and Liu, Y. (2006) Public Participation in Urban Planning: A Case Study of Wuhan City. Modern Urban Research, 8, 56-59.
Lloyd, M. G., Peel, D., and Duck, R. W. (2013) Towards a social?ecological resilience framework for coastal planning. Land Use Policy, 30(1), 925-933.
Madon, S., M.N. Malecela, K. Mashoto, R. Donohue, G. Mubyazi, and E. Michael. (2018) The Role of Community Participation for Sustainable Integrated Neglected Tropical Diseases and Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Intervention Programs: A Pilot Project in Tanzania. Social Science & Medicine, 202, 28-37.
Magarotto, M., Faria-de-Deus, R. A. Q. U. E. L., Costa, M. F., and Masanet, (2017) Green Areas in Coastal Cities-Conflict of Interests or Stakeholders? Perspective? International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 12(8), 1260-1271.
Mitchell, C. R. (1989) The Structure of International Conflict. Springer.
Moore, S. A., Brown, G., Kobryn, H., and Strickland-Munro, J. (2017) Identifying conflict potential in a coastal and marine environment using participatory mapping. Journal of Environmental Management, 197, 706-718.
Mochran, D. (2003) Analisis Konflik dan Resolusi Konflik. Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Narayanasamy, N. (2009) Participatory Rural Appraisal: Principles, Methods, and Application. SAGE Publications India.
Oakley, P., and Clegg, L. (1999) Promoting participatory development as a strategy of poverty alleviation in Sub-Saharan Africa: A review of some current practice. Journal of Social Development in Africa, 14, 31-52.
Parkins, J. R., and Mitchell, R. E. (2005) Public participation as public debate: a deliberative turn in natural resource management. Society and natural resources, 18(6), 529-540.
Prastiyo, W. E. (2016) Tingkat Partisipasi Masyarakat Di Kecamatan Teweh Tengah Dalam Penyusunan Rencana Kerja Pembangunan Daerah (RKPD) Kabupaten Barito Utara. Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Prestrelo, L. (2016) Identifying Multiple-use Conflicts before Marine Spatial Planning: A Case Study of a Multi-legislative Estuary in Brazil. Marine Policy, 67, 83-93.
Purba, I G. P. B. R., Rajendra, I G. N. A., and Agusintadewi, N. K. (2020) Mapping Analysis of Conflict Potential Utilization of Coastal Area Desa Pangkung Tibah, Kediri, Tabanan. Journal of A Sustainable Global South, 4(2), p. 36-44.
Purcell, R. (2009) Images for Change: Community Development, Community Arts and Photography. Community Development Journal, 44(1), 111-122.
Rizal, A., Apriliani, I. M., Permana, R., and Nurruhwati, I. (2020) Development and coastal environment change will have a meeting point. Case study of the coastal zone of West Java Province, Indonesia. Geo Journal of Tourism and Geosites, 31(3), 1034-1042.
Shan, C., & Yai, T. (2011). Public Involvement Requirements for Infrastructure Planning in China. Habitat International, 35(1), 158-166.
Smith, P. D., and McDonough, M. H. (2001) Beyond public participation: Fairness in natural resource decision making. Society & natural resources, 14(3), 239-249.
Sukardjo, S., and Pratiwi, R. (2015) Coastal Zone Space In Indonesia: Prelude To Conflict? International Journal Development Research, 5(01), 2992-3012.
Subandono, D. (2015) Membangun Poros Maritim Dunia: Dalam Perspektif Tata Ruang Laut. Kementrian Kelautan dan Perikanan. Direktorat Jenderal Kelautan, Pesisir dan Pulau-pulau Kecil. Direktorat Tata Ruang Laut, Pesisir dan Pulau-pulau Kecil, 328, 196-197.
Susan, N. (2014). Pengantar Sosiologi Konflik. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Susskind, L., and Thomas-Larmer, J. (1999) Conducting a conflict assessment. The consensus building handbook: A comprehensive guide to reaching an agreement, 1.
Susskind, L., and Cruikshank, J. (1987). Breaking the impasse. New York.
Tokey, I., S. A. Shioma, M. M. Munir, D. Hossain, M. S. Akther, and I. Islam. (2020) Redevelopment of a Dense Area: A Participatory Planning Approach for Regeneration in Old Dhaka, Bangladesh. Journal of Regional and City Planning, 31(3), 217-236.
Tuda A. O., T.F. Steven, and L. D. Rodwell. (2014) Resolving coastal conflicts using marine spatial planning Elsevier. Journal of Environmental Management, 133, 59-68.
Virtudes, A. (2016) Good Governance Principles in Spatial Planning at Local Scale. Procedia Engineering, 161, 1710-1714.
Wilmot, W. W., and Hocker, J. (2010) Interpersonal Conflict (8a).
Wirawan. (2009) Konflik dan Manajemen Konflik: Teori, Aplikasi, dan Penelitian. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
Zaim, Z., Rudiarto, I., Buchori, I., and Wahyudi, A. (2020) Community Participation Pattern in Communal Village Land Utilization. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 8(3), 54-67.
Zou, L., Liu, Y., Wang, J., and Yang, Y. (2021) An analysis of land use potential conflicts based on ecological-production-living function in the southeast coastal area of China. Ecological Indicators, 122, 107297.
Zhang, Q. (2007) Transcending the Dilemma of ?Public Interest. Frontiers of Law in China, 2(1), 23
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Regional and City Planning

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Manuscript submitted to JRCP has to be an original work of the author(s), contains no element of plagiarism, and has never been published or is not being considered for publication in other journals. The author(s) retain the copyright of the content published in JRCP. There is no need for request or consultation for future re-use and re-publication of the content as long as the author and the source are cited properly.