A Study of Green Infrastructure in European Cities: Opportunities and possibilities: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Jenan Hussein; Peter Kumble; Henry W.A  Hanson IV

doi:10.5614/jpwk.2023.34.3.3

Authors

Jenan Hussein Department of Landscape and Urban Planning, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Science, Prague, Czech Republic
Peter Kumble Department of Landscape and Urban Planning, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Science, Prague, Czech Republic
Henry W.A Hanson IV Department of Landscape and Urban Planning, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Science, Prague, Czech Republic

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5614/jpwk.2023.34.3.3

Keywords:

European cities, green infrastructure, meta-analysis, opportunities, systematic review

Abstract

Green infrastructure (GI) is generally defined as a network of natural and semi-natural regions that has been sensitively developed and managed to provide an array of ecosystem services and improve people?s well-being. Across Europe, the notion of GI has had a robust association with the the impacts of climate change, multifunctionality, and green growth; this is especially true over the past ten years, from 2012 to 2022. This has resulted in a broad-based agenda on policy and research with vast differences, targeting a variety of themes and cultures. The systematic review and meta-analysis conducted in this paper present an up-to-date review of the main attributes of GI-related research and the implications for the member states within the European Union (EU). GI-related concepts, thematic clusters, and the main priorities within the research were considered in our review. Due to the ambiguity of the definition of GI, a broad diversity of research goals and published output are discussed. It was also seen that green spaces situated within urban areas and their related ecosystem services are the most common topics in the literature. Based on this, we recommend that an in-depth integration of the goals pertaining to nature conservation be conducted to understand how GI may pertain towards sustainable transitions in and outside the city.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abson DJ, von Wehrden H, Baumgtner S, Fischer J, Hanspach J, Hdtle W, Heinrichs H, Klein AM, Lang DJ, Martens P, Walmsley D. 2014. Ecosystem services as a boundary object for sustainability. Ecol Econ [Internet]. 103:29?37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.012

Andersson K, Angelstam P, Elbakidze M, Axelsson R, Degerman E. 2013. Green infrastructures and intensive forestry: Need and opportunity for spatial planning in a Swedish rural?urban gradient. Scand J For Res [Internet]. 28(2):143?165. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2012.723740

Anguelovski I, Connolly JJ, Garcia-Lamarca M, Cole H, Pearsall H. 2019. New scholarly pathways on green gentrification: What does the urban ?green turn? mean and where is it going? Prog Hum Geogr [Internet]. 43(6):1064?1086. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132518803799

Apostolopoulou E, Adams W. 2016. Cutting nature to fit: Urbanization, neoliberalism and biodiversity offsetting in England [Internet]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319235269_Cutting_nature_to_fit_Urbanization_neoliberalism_and_biodiversity_offsetting_in_England

Apostolopoulou E, Adams WM. 2017. Biodiversity offsetting and conservation: Reframing nature to save it. Oryx [Internet]. 51(1):23?31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605315000782

Artmann M, Mueller C, Goetzlich L, Hof A. 2019. Supply and Demand Concerning Urban Green Spaces for Recreation by Elderlies Living in Care Facilities: The Role of Accessibility in an Explorative Case Study in Austria. Front Environ Sci [Internet]. 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2019.00136

Barbesgaard M. 2018. Blue growth: savior or ocean grabbing? J Peasant Stud [Internet]. 45(1):130?149. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2017.1377186

Brenner N, Schmid C. 2015. Towards a new epistemology of the urban? City [Internet]. 19(2?3):151?182. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2015.1014712

Brzoska P, Sp??e A. 2020. From City- to Site-Dimension: Assessing the Urban Ecosystem Services of Different Types of Green Infrastructure. Land [Internet]. 9(5):150. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9050150

Chatzimentor A, Apostolopoulou E, Mazaris AD. 2020. A review of green infrastructure research in Europe: Challenges and opportunities. Landsc Urban Plan [Internet]. 198:103775.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103775

Cohen-Shacham E, Walters G, Janzen C, Maginnis S. 2016. Nature-based solutions to address global societal challenges [Internet]. [place unknown]: IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2016.13.en

Colantoni A, Zambon I, Gras M, Mosconi EM, Stefanoni A, Salvati L. 2018. Clustering or scattering? The spatial distribution of cropland in a metropolitan region, 1960-2010. Sustain.10(7):1?12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072584

European Environment Agency. 2011. Mapping the impacts of natural hazards and technological accidents in Europe [Internet]. https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/direct-losses-from-weather-disasters- 3/IRationaleReference1232462446114

Garmendia E, Apostolopoulou E, Adams WM, Bormpoudakis D. 2016. Biodiversity and Green Infrastructure in Europe: Boundary object or ecological trap? Land use policy [Internet]. 56:315?319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.04.003

Geneletti D, Zardo L. 2016. Ecosystem-based adaptation in cities: An analysis of European urban climate adaptation plans. Land use policy [Internet]. 50:38?47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.09.003

Gez-Baggethun E, Naredo JM. 2015. In search of lost time: the rise and fall of limits to growth in international sustainability policy. Sustain Sci. 10(3):385?395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0308-6

Hehn C. 2016. The emergence and evolution of Green Infrastructure planning in North West England: a policy arrangement approach [Internet]. http://www.landschaft.tu.berlin.de/fileadmin/fg218/Publikationen/Claudia_Hehn_2016_GI_in_NW-England.pdf

Horwood K. 2011. Green infrastructure: reconciling urban green space and regional economic development: lessons learnt from experience in England?s north-west region. Local Environ [Internet]. 16(10):963?975. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2011.607157

Ioj? CI, Gr?dinaru SR, Onose DA, V?u GO, Tudor AC. 2014. The potential of school green areas to improve urban green connectivity and multifunctionality. Urban For Urban Green [Internet]. 13(4):704?713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2014.07.002

Johanna K. 2010. Green Infrastructure Implementation and Efficiency. Eur Comm Conf [Internet]. (November):28. https://ieep.eu/uploads/articles/attachments/816ebcec-4744-4c23-99607aa808e91c2e/Green_Infrastructure_Implementation_and_Efficiency.pdf?v = 63664509767

Lennon M. 2015. Green infrastructure and planning policy: a critical assessment. Local Environ [Internet]. 20(8):957?980. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2014.880411

Maes J, Jacobs S. 2017. Nature-Based Solutions for Europe?s Sustainable Development. Conserv Lett [Internet]. 10(1):121?124. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12216

McFarland AR, Larsen L, Yeshitela K, Engida AN, Love NG. 2019. Guide for using green infrastructure in urban environments for stormwater management. Environ Sci Water Res Technol [Internet]. 5(4):643?659. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8EW00498F

Mell I. 2020. The impact of austerity on funding green infrastructure: A DPSIR evaluation of the Liverpool Green & Open Space Review (LG & OSR), UK. Land use policy [Internet]. 91:104284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104284

Mell IC, Henneberry J, Hehl-Lange S, Keskin B. 2013. Promoting urban greening: Valuing the development of green infrastructure investments in the urban core of Manchester, UK. Urban For Urban Green [Internet]. 12(3):296?306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2013.04.006

Nessher C, Assmuth T, Irvine KN, Rusch GM, Waylen KA, Delbaere B, Haase D, Jones- Walters L, Keune H, Kovacs E, et al. 2017. The science, policy and practice of nature-based solutions: An interdisciplinary perspective. Sci Total Environ [Internet]. 579:1215?1227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.106

Nita A, Rozylowicz L, Manolache S, Cioc?nea CM, Miu IV, Popescu VD. 2016. Collaboration Networks in Applied Conservation Projects across Europe. Xia C-Y, editor. PLoS One [Internet]. 11(10):e0164503. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164503

Parker J. 2015. A survey of park user perception in the context of green space and city liveability: Lake Claremont, Western Australia. J Chem Inf Model [Internet]. 53(9):1689?1699. https://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/id/eprint/40856/1/Parker.pdf

Parker J, Simpson G. 2018. Visitor Satisfaction with a Public Green Infrastructure and Urban Nature Space in Perth, Western Australia. Land [Internet]. 7(4):159. https://doi.org/10.3390/land7040159

Pauleit S, Ambrose-Oji B, Andersson E, Anton B, Buijs A, Haase D, Elands B, Hansen R, Kowarik I, Kronenberg J, et al. 2019. Advancing urban green infrastructure in Europe: Outcomes and reflections from the GREEN SURGE project. Urban For Urban Green [Internet]. 40:4?16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.10.006

Pauleit S, Hansen R, Rall EL, Rolf W, van Lierop M. 2020. Green Infrastructure for the city of the future. Perspectives from Europe. Work Pap Riv online di Urban@it [Internet]. 2:1?11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344783901_Green_Infrastructure_for_the_city_of_the_future_Perspectives_from_Europe

Pickering C, Byrne J. 2014. The benefits of publishing systematic quantitative literature reviews for PhD candidates and other early-career researchers. High Educ Res Dev [Internet].33(3):534?548. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.841651

Piselli C, Castaldo VL, Pigliautile I, Pisello AL, Cotana F. 2018. Outdoor comfort conditions in urban areas: On citizens? perspective about microclimate mitigation of urban transit areas. Sustain Cities Soc [Internet]. 39:16?36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.02.004

Salomaa A, Paloniemi R, Kotiaho JS, Kettunen M, Apostolopoulou E, Cent J. 2017. Can green infrastructure help to conserve biodiversity? Environ Plan C Polit Sp [Internet]. 35(2):265?288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X16649363

Sussams LW, Sheate WR, Eales RP. 2015. Green infrastructure as a climate change adaptation policy intervention: Muddying the waters or clearing a path to a more secure future? J Environ Manage [Internet]. 147:184?193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.09.003

Timonen J, Siitonen J, Gustafsson L, Kotiaho JS, Stokland JN, Sverdrup-Thygeson A, Mkken M. 2010. Woodland key habitats in northern Europe: concepts, inventory and protection. Scand J For Res [Internet]. 25(4):309?324. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2010.497160

Wang J, Banzhaf E. 2018. Towards a better understanding of Green Infrastructure: A critical review. Ecol Indic [Internet]. 85:758?772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.09.018

Wright H. 2011. Understanding green infrastructure: the development of a contested concept in England. Local Environ [Internet]. 16(10):1003?1019. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2011.631993