Padaleman Karuhun and Songko as Indigenous Spatial Planning Logic: A Phenomenological Study

Authors

  • Imam Indratno Magister of Urban and Regional Planning, Universitas Islam Bandung,
  • Ina Helena Agustina Magister of Urban and Regional Planning, Universitas Islam Bandung
  • Sugih Dinul Yakin
  • M. Ari Fandi Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Maritime Engineering and Technology, Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji
  • Deshinta Arova Dewi Center for Data Science and Sustainable Technologies, INTI International University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5614/jpwk.2026.37.1.5

Abstract

Across Southeast Asia, indigenous settlements are not merely places of habitation but living spatial systems in which moral order, ecological ethics, customary authority, and intergenerational knowledge are embedded in everyday practices. Yet these systems remain insufficiently recognized in contemporary settlement planning, heritage conservation, and customary land governance, where interventions frequently privilege technocratic approaches over locally embedded spatial knowledge. This study examines Kampung Adat Kuta (West Java) and Nagari Panti Selatan (West Sumatra): the former a vertically organized sacred-ecological system rooted in Sundanese cosmology, the latter a horizontally structured socio-institutional system grounded in Minangkabau matrilineal tradition. Using a comparative qualitative approach grounded in Alfred Schutz?s phenomenology, the research integrates in-depth interviews, participant observation, ritual documentation, and cultural mapping to examine how indigenous spatial meanings are produced, institutionalized, and transmitted across generations. The analysis shows that Inget Karuhun, Padaleman Karuhun, and Songko function not merely as cultural symbols but as indigenous spatial planning logics: Padaleman Karuhun organizes a settlement through a vertically integrated sacred-ecological hierarchy governed by ritual obligation and ancestral norms, while Songko structures a settlement through a horizontally integrated socio-spatial system based on matrilineal governance, communal institutions, and symbolic authority. These findings extend planning scholarship by showing that indigenous settlements embody coherent systems relevant to settlement planning, heritage conservation, and customary land governance, and propose indigenous spatial planning logic as an ontological planning perspective that recognizes indigenous settlements as living planning systems rather than cultural landscapes or heritage objects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adnan, M. A., Sunarto, A., & Khair, A. (2026). Customary law for equitable spatial planning: Preventing social bankruptcy and enhancing community welfare. SASI, 32(1), 14?29. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v32i1.3467

Agyeman, J. (2013). Introducing just sustainabilities: Policy, planning, and practice. Zed Books.

Akbar, A., Flacke, J., Martinez, J., & van Maarseveen, M. F. A. M. (2020a). Participatory planning practice in rural Indonesia: A sustainable development goals-based evaluation. Community Development, 51(3), 243?260. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2020.1765822

Akbar, A., Flacke, J., Martinez, J., & van Maarseveen, M. F. A. M. (2020b). Spatial knowledge: A potential to enhance public participation? Sustainability, 12(12), 5025. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125025

Antrop, M. (2005). Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70(1?2), 21?34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.021

Barry, J., & Porter, L. (2012). Indigenous recognition in state-based planning systems: Understanding textual mediation in the contact zone. Planning Theory, 11(2), 170?187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095211427285

Barry, J., & Thompson-Fawcett, M. (2020). Decolonizing the boundaries between the ?planner? and the ?planned?: Implications of Indigenous property development. Planning Theory & Practice, 21(3), 410?425. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2020.1775874

Booth, A. L., & Muir, B. R. (2011). Environmental and land-use planning approaches of Indigenous groups in Canada: An overview. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 13(4), 421?442. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2011.635881

Casey, E. S. (1997). The fate of place: A philosophical history. University of California Press.

Chassagne, N. (2020). Buen Vivir as an alternative to sustainable development: Lessons from Ecuador. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003023074

Daiyan A., M. M., Sakib A., S. N., & Pasha A., A. K. (2025). Assessing community resilience against climatic disasters: A case study on local adaptation strategies in the Barguna District. INTI Journal, 2025(02), 1?12. https://doi.org/10.61453/INTIj.202502

Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the pluriverse: Radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Duke University Press.

Faturahman, M. A., Hidayat, A., Yulianto, M., & Putri, S. R. (2021). Rumah Gadang sebagai lambang demokrasi suku Minangkabau di Sumatera Utara. Jurnal Soshum Insentif, 4(1), 54?59. https://doi.org/10.36787/jsi.v4i1.465

Fowler, P. (2003). World heritage cultural landscapes 1992?2002. UNESCO World Heritage Centre.

Hammar, R. K. R., Samangun, C., Malik, Y., & Luturmas, A. (2021). Spatial planning for Indigenous law communities to solve social conflict resolution in West Papua Indonesia. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 12(4), 405?423.

Harvey, D. (2001). Spaces of capital: Towards a critical geography. Routledge.

Healey, P. (2007). Urban complexity and spatial strategies: Towards a relational planning for our times. Routledge.

Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523

Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. Routledge.

Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2010). Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. Routledge.

Jingling, Z. (2021). The social functions of Rumah Gadang of Kinari Village in modern society. International Journal of Culture and Art Studies, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.32734/ijcas.v5i1.4802

Jojola, T. (2008). Indigenous planning?An emerging context. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 17(1 Suppl.), 37?47.

Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Blackwell.

Li, T. M. (2007). The will to improve: Governmentality, development, and the practice of politics. Duke University Press.

Low, S. M. (2017). Spatializing culture: The ethnography of space and place. Routledge.

Low, S. M., & Lawrence-Ziga, D. (Eds.). (2003). The anthropology of space and place: Locating culture. Blackwell.

Luckmann, T. (1983). Life-world and social realities. Heinemann.

Massey, D. (2005). For space. SAGE.

Matunga, H. (2013). Theorizing Indigenous planning. In R. Walker, T. Jojola, & D. Natcher (Eds.), Reclaiming Indigenous planning (pp. 3?32). McGill-Queen?s University Press.

Mignolo, W. D. (2011). The darker side of Western modernity: Global futures, decolonial options. Duke University Press.

Miraftab, F. (2009). Insurgent planning: Situating radical planning in the Global South. Planning Theory, 8(1), 32?50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095208099297

Miraftab, F. (2016). Global heartland: Displaced labor, transnational lives, and local placemaking. Indiana University Press.

Nirwansyah, A. W., Andriani, A., Wuliandari, J. R., Mandili, A., & Sriyanto. (2025). Spatial knowledge: A tool for community planning and addressing environmental issues in regional context? Journal of Regional and City Planning, 36(1), 44?58. https://doi.org/10.5614/jpwk.2025.36.1.3

Nisa, A., & Surtikanti, H. K. (2024). Environmental ethics of Kuta traditional village community in preserving the environment and its future prospects. Interaction, Community Engagement, and Social Environment, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.61511/icese.v1i2.2024.388

Norberg-Schulz, C. (1980). Genius loci: Towards a phenomenology of architecture. Rizzoli.

Nuraeni, S., Agustin, F., Widana, K., Januar, H., Aditya, F. F., & Sudarto, S. (2025). Conservation through eco-spirituality: A philosophical approach to the residential patterns and traditional architecture of the Kampung Adat Kuta. JAMASAN: Jurnal Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sejarah, 1(1), 68?86. https://doi.org/10.25157/jamasan.v1i1.5316

Oliver, P. (2006). Built to meet needs: Cultural issues in vernacular architecture. Elsevier.

Porter, L. (2010). Unlearning the colonial cultures of planning. Ashgate.

Porter, L., & Barry, J. (2016). Planning for coexistence? Recognising Indigenous rights through land-use planning in Canada and Australia. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315600727

Porter, L., Matunga, H., Viswanathan, L., Patrick, L., Walker, R., Sandercock, L., Moraes, D., Frantz, J., Thompson-Fawcett, M., Riddle, C., & Jojola, T. (2017). Indigenous planning: From principles to practice. Planning Theory & Practice, 18(4), 639?666. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2017.1380961

Putri, G. S. Y. (2025). Kajian spasial pada sistem kekerabatan matrilineal masyarakat Minangkabau Nagari Koto Baru dalam Rumah Gadang. Jurnal Arsitektur ARCADE, 9(1), 30?36. https://doi.org/10.31848/arcade.v9i1.3963

Rapoport, A. (1969). House form and culture. Prentice-Hall.

Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. Pion.

Rotfu E., & Dfler, T. (2023). The geography of the life-world: Spatialising the social theory of Alfred Schz. Erdkunde, 77(2), 149?161. https://doi.org/10.3112/erdkunde.2023.02.04

Roy, A. (2011). Slumdog cities: Rethinking subaltern urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(2), 223?238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01051.x

Sandercock, L. (1998). Towards cosmopolis: Planning for multicultural cities. Wiley.

Saraswati, S., & Fardani, I. (2025). Compatibility of local spatial planning based on traditional rules in Kampung Naga with the formal spatial planning in Indonesia. Alam Cipta, 18(1), 142?155. https://doi.org/10.47836/AC.18.1.ARTICLE9

Schutz, A. (1967). The phenomenology of the social world. Northwestern University Press.

Schutz, A., & Luckmann, T. (1973). The structures of the life-world. Northwestern University Press.

Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press.

Seamon, D. (2000). A way of seeing people and place: Phenomenology in environment-behavior research. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20(2), 157?178. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1999.0152

Seamon, D. (2018). Life takes place: Phenomenology, lifeworlds, and place making. Routledge.

Sillitoe, P. (2010). Indigenous knowledge in development: An introduction. Anthropology Today, 26(1), 1?4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8322.2010.00735.x

Simone, A. M. (2004). People as infrastructure: Intersecting fragments in Johannesburg. Public Culture, 16(3), 407?429. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-16-3-407

Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). Zed Books.

Soja, E. W. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Blackwell.

Sulistyawan, B. S., Verweij, P. A., Boot, R. G. A., Purwanti, B., Rumbiak, W., Wattimena, M. C., Rahawarin, P., & Adzan, G. (2018). Integrating participatory GIS into spatial planning regulation: The case of Merauke District, Papua, Indonesia. International Journal of the Commons, 12(1), 26?59. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.759

Surya, V. D. A., & Adhitama, G. P. (2021). Rumah Gadang: Ruang dan budaya makan dalam siklus hidup masyarakat Minangkabau. Serat Rupa: Journal of Design, 5(1), 81?107. https://doi.org/10.28932/srjd.v5i1.2984

Taylor, K., & Lennon, J. (2011). Cultural landscapes: A bridge between culture and nature? International Journal of Heritage Studies, 17(6), 537?554. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2011.618246

Tilley, C. (1994). A phenomenology of landscape: Places, paths and monuments. Berg.

Tuan, Y.-F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. University of Minnesota Press.

UNESCO. (2012). Operational guidelines for the implementation of the World Heritage Convention. UNESCO World Heritage Centre.

Villalba, U. (2013). Buen Vivir vs development: A paradigm shift in the Andes? Third World Quarterly, 34(8), 1427?1442. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2013.831594

Walker, R., Jojola, T., & Natcher, D. (Eds.). (2013). Reclaiming Indigenous planning. McGill-Queen?s University Press.

Watson, V. (2009). Seeing from the South: Refocusing urban planning on the globe?s central urban issues. Urban Studies, 46(11), 2259?2275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009342598

Watson, V. (2014). African urban fantasies: Dreams or nightmares? Environment and Urbanization, 26(1), 215?231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247813513705

Watson, V. (2016). Shifting approaches to planning theory: Global North and South. Urban Planning, 1(4), 32?41. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v1i4.727

Wensing, E., & Porter, L. (2016). Unsettling planning?s paradigms: Towards a just accommodation of Indigenous rights and interests in Australian urban planning? Australian Planner, 53(2), 91?102. https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2015.1118394

Widya, A. T., Lestari, A. D. E., Vividia, Y. S., Nurzukhrufa, A., Aziza, M. R., & Tanjung, A. S. (2025). Morphological change of coastal kampung kota: Resilience and vulnerability of Kampung Cungkeng and Sinar Laut, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia. Journal of Regional and City Planning, 36(2), 23?47. https://doi.org/10.5614/jpwk.2025.36.2.2

Yiftachel, O. (2006). Ethnocracy: Land and identity politics in Israel/Palestine. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-15

How to Cite

Indratno, I., Agustina, I. H., Yakin, S. D., Fandi, M. A., & Arova Dewi, D. . (2026). Padaleman Karuhun and Songko as Indigenous Spatial Planning Logic: A Phenomenological Study. Journal of Regional and City Planning, 37(1), 112-135. https://doi.org/10.5614/jpwk.2026.37.1.5

Issue

Section

Research Articles