Tata  Kelola Teknologi Dalam Perencanaan Sektor Publik

Sony Yuliar

Authors

Sony Yuliar Kelompok Keahlian Pengelolaan Pembangunan dan Pengembangan Kebijakan, Sekolah Arsitektur, Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Kebijakan, ITB

Keywords:

public sector planning, planning implementation, technology governance translation, actor-network theory

Abstract

While in general planning concerns with social criteria and objectives, the implementation of planning often involves the introduction of new technology to regional/local communities. An important question for successful planning implementation would then be how those social criteria and objectives be integrated into technology selection process. This question leads us to a technology governance/steering problem within the context of planning. This article addresses this problem within the context of public sector planning, by arguing for a socio-technical co-evolutionary approach. By employing the notion of translation that is central in actor-network theory, a model for empirical studies is proposed. Empirical cases are presented from which normative principles for technology governance in public sector planning can be drawn.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agger, Annika dan Karl Lofglen. 2008. "Democratic Assessment of Collaborative Planning Process." Planning Theory. Vol. 7 (2), p.145-164.

Albrechts, Louis. 2003. "Reconstructing Decision-Making: Planning Versus Politics." Planning Theory, Vol. 2, p.249.

Amir, S., I. Nurlaila and S. Yuliar. 2008. "Cultivating Energy, Reducing Poverty: Biofuel Development in an Indonesian Village." Perspectives on Global Development and Technology. Vol.7(2), p.113-132.

Bevir, Mark dan R. A. Rhodes. 2001. "A Decentered Theory of Governance: Rational Choice, Institutionalism, and Interpretation." Institute of Governmental Studies. http://repositories.cdlib.org/igs/WP2001-10

Bijker, Wiebe and John Law (eds). 1990. The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Direction in The Sociology and History of Technology. The MIT Press. Cambridge Massachusetts, London England.

Bruijn, Hans de et al. 2004. Creating System Innovation: How Large Scale Transitions Emerge. A.A. Balkema Publishers, London.

Byrne, David. 2003. "Complexity Theory and Planning Theory: A Necessary Encounter." Planning Theory. Vol. 2, p.171.

Callon, Michel and Bruno Latour. 1981. "Unscrewing the Big Leviathan: How Actors Macro-Structure Reality and How Sociologist Help Them To Do So" dalam Karin Knorr-Cetina dan A.V. Cicouvel (eds.), Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Towards an Integrations of Micro and Macro-Sociology. Boston, MA; London: Routledge.

Callon, Michel. 1995. "Technologucal Conception and Adoption Network: Lessons for the CTA Practitioner", dalam Arie Rip et.al (eds), Managing Technology in Society: the Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment, Pinter Publisher. London and New York.

Fisher, E., R.L. Mahajan, dan C. Mitcham. 2006. "Midstream Modulation of Technology: Governance From Within." Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, Vol. 26, No. 6.

Friedmann, John. 2003. "Why Do Planning Theory." Planning Theory, Vol. 2, No. 7.

Howe, Joe and Colin Langdon. 2002. "Towards a Reflexive Planning Theory." Planning Theory. Vol.1, p.209.

Jantsch, Erich. 1972. Technological Planning and Social Futures. Associated Business Programmes Ltd., London. Rip, Arie, Thomas J. Misa dan Johan Schot (eds). 1995. Managing Technology in Society: The Approach of Contructive Technology Assessment. Pinter Publishers, London and New York.

Masik, Agustomi. 2005. "Hubungan Modal Sosial dan Perencanaan." Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota. Vol. 16(3), p.1-23.

Sanyal, Bishwapriya. 2005. "Planning as Anticipation of Resistance." Planning Theory. Vol.4, p.225.