Depolarization in Delivering Public Services? Impacts of Minimum Service Standards (MSS) on the Quality of Health Services in Indonesia

Mohammad Roudo, Tengku Munawar Chalil

Abstract


Abstract. Some scholars argue that decentralization policy tends to create polarization, i.e. an increase of inequality/disparity among districts. To deal with this problem, Minimum Service Standards (MSS) were introduced as a key strategy in decentralizing Indonesia. In this research, we tried to find out through MSS performance measurements whether imposing standards can be effective in a decentralized system by seeking its impacts on polarization/depolarization in the delivery of public services, specifically in the health sector. This question is basically a response to the common criticism that decentralization is good to create equality between central government and local governments but often does not work to achieve equality among local governments. Using self-assessment data from a sample of 54 districts from 534 districts in Indonesia, from 2010 to 2013, we found that the existence of depolarization in the delivery of public services could potentially occur among regions by reducing the gap between their public service performance and the targets of MSS. We acknowledge that there are weaknesses in the validity of the self-assessment data, caused by a lack of knowledge and skills to execute the self-assessment according to the official guidelines, by the overrating of target achievements, as well as the lack of data from independent sources to confirm the self-assessment outcomes. We also acknowledge that differences in financial capacity are still the main determinant why one district is more successful in achieving the MSS targets compared to other districts.

 

Keywords. Decentralization, Public Service, Minimum Standard Service


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmad, E., and G. Brosio. (2009) What do we know? Evidence on decentralization and local service provision. In Ahmad, E., and G. Brosio (ed.) Does decentralization enhance service delivery and poverty reduction? United Kingdom: Edward Elgar, p. 125-160.

Ahmad, J., S. Devarajan, and S. Khemani, et al. (2006) Decentralization and service delivery. In Ahmad, E., and G. Brosio. (ed.) Handbook of fiscal federalism. United Kingdom: Edward Elgar, p. 240-268.

Alm, J., J.M.Vazquez., and D.Weist. (2004). Introduction. In Alm, J., Vasquez, J. M., Indrawati, S. M (eds.) Reforming intergovernmental fiscal relations and the rebuilding of Indonesia: the ‘big bang’ program and its consequences. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, p. 1-14.

Aritenang, A. (2008) A study on Indonesia regions disparity: post decentralization. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA) Paper No 25245 [on line] Available from: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/25245/1/MPRA_paper_25245.pdf [Accessed 21 June 2014]

Aritenang, A. (2009) The impact of government budget shifts to regional disparities in Indonesia: before and after Decentralization. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA) Paper No 25243 [on line] Available from: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/25243/1/MPRA_paper_25243.pdf [Accessed 21 June 2014]

Aritenang, A. (2015) The Impact of the AFTA Tariff Reduction on Districts Economic Growth. Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, April 2015 Vol.26 No.1 P.18-27.

Aspinall, E., and G.Fealy. (2003) Introduction: decentralization, democratization and the rise of local. In Aspinall, E., and Fealy, G. (ed.) Local power and politics in Indonesia: democratization and decentralization. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Bahl, R. (2009) Promise and reality of fiscal decentralization. In Ichimura, S., and Bahl, R. Decentralization policies in Asian Development. Singapore: World Scientific. pp.1-26.

Bardhan, P., and D.Mookherjee. (2006). The rise of local governments: an overview. In Bardhan, P., and D.Mookherjee. Decentralization and local governance in developing countries: a comparative perspective. Massachusetts: MIT Press. p. 1 –52.

Faguet, J. P. (2011) Decentralization and governance. Economic Organization and Public Policy. Discussion Papers: EOPP 027. London: London School of Economics and Political Science. Available from: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/37346/ [Accessed June 5t, 2015]

Fengler, W., and B.Hofman. (2009) “Managing Indonesia’s rapid decentralization: achievements and challenges”. In Ichimura, S., and Bahl, R. Decentralization Policies in Asian Development. Singapore: World Scientific, p. 245-262.

Ferrazzi, G. (2005) Obligatory functions and minimum services standards for Indonesia regional government: searching for a model. Public Administration and Development. 25 (2): 227-238.

Hague, R., and M. Harrop. (2010) Comparative government and politics: an introduction. 8th ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Haryanto, A. (2010) Improving service quality of District Education Offices (DEO) in Indonesia decentralized education system. Unpublished PhD Thesis. The School of Management, College of Business, RMIT University. Available from https://researchbank.rmit.edu.au/eserv/rmit:9481/Haryanto.pdf [Accessed June 5, 2015]

Hofman, B., and K. Kaiser. (2006) Decentralization, democratic transition, and local governance in Indonesia. In Bardhan, P., and D. Mookherjee (eds.) Decentralization and local governance in developing countries: a comparative perspective. Massachusetts: MIT Press Books, p. 81-124.

Kristiansen, S., and Pratikno (2006) Decentralising education in Indonesia. International Journal of Educational Development. 26 (2006): 513–531.

Mohamad, I. (2007) Minimum service standards as public service improvement efforts: the Indonesian experience. Presented in Eropa Seminar in Service Quality in Public Sector: An Outcome-Based Approach. Tehran: 18-22 November 2007. Available from http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/EROPA/UNPAN029263.pdf [Acessed 5 June 2015)

Oates, W. E. (1972) Fiscal federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich

Roudo, M. (2014) The Introduction of Minimum Services Standards (MSS) As the Strategy to Enhance Quality of Basic Public Services in Indonesia’s Decentralized System: Potential Benefits and Risks. Presented on 6th International Conference on Public Administration in the 21st Century: Opportunities and Challenges. Macau, China, October 16-17, 2014. Available on May 26, 2015 [http://www.academia.edu/8903864/The_Introduction_of_Minimum_Services_Standards_MSS_As_the_Strategy_to_Enhance_Quality_of_Basic_Public_Services_in_Indonesia_s_Decentralized_System_Potential_Benefits_and_Risks]

Schulze, G. G., and B.S. Sjahrir. (2014) Decentralization, governance and public service delivery. In Hill, H (ed). Regional Dynamics in a Decentralized Indonesia. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, p. 187-207.

Seabright, P. (1996). Accountability and decentralization in government: an incomplete contracts model. European Economic Review. 40 (1): 61-89.

Strategic Asia. (2013) Decentralization assessment report. Jakarta: UNDP and Strategic Asia.

World Bank. (2003). Decentralizing Indonesia. The World Bank: Jakarta.

World Bank (2011). Capacity Development of Minimum Service Standards (MSS): Costing and Implementation. The World Bank: Jakarta.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5614%2Fjrcp.2016.27.1.1

Copyright © 2016 Journal of Regional and City Planning

Creative Commons License
This work licensed under CC-BY-NC, a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Visitor Counter