Pluralitas Dalam Teori Perencanaan

Rina Priyani


Pluralism is nothing new but plurality approach in planning theory is  a  recent  reaction  to  the  failture  of  rational  comprehensive planning. Planning itself is considered to be “a good planning” if  it  could  accommodate  the  plurality.  The  idea  of  plurality  c an  be explored   in  diversity  and  difference  concepts  as  coined  by Sandercock.  This  article  aims  to  discuss  plurality  in  planning theory  using  the  phenomenon  of  urban  heritage  as  one  of multicultural  city‟s  assets.  Opportunity  and  limitation  in
developing  the  concepts  are  discussed  to  emphasize  its contribution to planning theory and practice.


teori perencanaan; pluralitas; urban heritage

Full Text:



Abbot, J. 2005. "Understanding and Managing the Unknown: The Nature of Uncertainty in Planning." Journal of Planning Education and Research 24: 237-251.

Allmendinger, P. 2001. Planning in Postmodern Times. London: Routledge.

Allmendinger, P. 2002a. Planning Theory. Hampshire: Palgrave.

Allmendinger, P. 2002b. "Towards a Post-positivist Typology of Planning Theory." Planning Theory 1(1): 77-99.

Alsayyad, N. 2001. Consuming Tradition, Manufacturing Heritage: Global Norms and Urban Forms in the Age of Tourism. London: Routledge.

Ashworth, G. & J. E. Tunbridge. 1994. The Tourist-Historic City. Chichester:John Wiley & Sons.

Ashworth, G. 1991. Heritage Planning: Conservation as the Management of Urban Change. Groningen: Geo Pers.

Ashworth, G. 2000. From History to Heritage: From Heritage to Identity: In Search of Concepts and Models in G. Ashworth (ed.). Building a New Heritage: Tourism, Culture, and Identity in the New Europe. London & New York: Routledge.

Asia-Pacific Cultural Centre for UNESCO. 2006. Program Report: Training Course on the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Heritage in the Asia-Pacific Region 2005.Nara: ACCU.

Avrami, E., R. Mason & M. de la Torre. 2000. Values and Heritage Conservation. Research Report. Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute.

Berke, P.R. & M.M. Conroy. 2000. “Are We Planning for Sustainable Development?” APA Journal 66(1): 21-33.

Brooks, M. P. 2002. Planning Theory for Practitioners. Chicago IL: Planners Press.

Campbell, S. 1996. “Green Cities, Growing Cities, Just Cities? Urban Planning and the Contradictions of Sustainable Development.” APA Journal 62(3): 296-312.

Campbell, S. and S. Fanstein 1996. Readings in Planning Theory. Cambridge & Oxford: Blackwell.

Fanstein, S. S. 2000. "New Directions in Planning Theory." Urban Affairs Review 35(4): 451-78.

Fanstein, S. S. 2005a "Planning Theory and the City." Journal of Planning Education and Research 25: 121-1

Fanstein, S. S. 2005b. "Cities and Diversity: Should We Want It? Can We Plan for It?" Urban Affairs Review 41(1): 3-19.

Friedmann, J. 1987. Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

Friedmann, J. 2005.”Planning Cultures in Transition”. dalam Sanyal, B. (ed.) Comparative Planning Cultures. New York & London: Routledge.

Graham, B., G. J. Ashworth, & J. E. Tunbridge. 2004. A Geography of Heritage: Power, Culture and Economy. London: Arnold.

Gunder, M. 2005. "The Production of Desirous Space: Mere Fantasies of the Utopian City?" Planning Theory 4(2): 173-199.

Hartono, H. D. 2005. Strategi Kegiatan Konservasi Bangunan Bersejarah Periode Kolonial di Jakarta, Bandung, dan Surabaya. Program Doktor Arsitektur. Bandung: Institut Teknologi Bandung. Disertasi Doktor.

Healey, P. 1987. Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. London, MacMillan.

Healey, P. 2003. "Collaborative Planning in Perspective." Planning Theory 2(2): 101-123.

Hendler, S. 1995. Planning Ethics. New Brunswick NJ, CUPR Press.

Herbert, D.T. 1997. Heritage, Tourism, and Society, London: Pinter Press.

Hillier, J. and M. Gunder 2003. "Planning Fantasies? An Exploration of a Potential Lacanian Framework for Understanding Development Assessment Planning." Planning Theory 2(3): 225-248.

Jaringan Pelestarian Pusaka Indonesia & ICOMOS Indonesia. 2003. Piagam Pelestarian Pusaka Indonesia. Kocabaş, A. 2006. Urban Conservation in Istanbul: Evaluation and Re-conceptualisation. Habitat International 30(1):107-126.

Larkham, P. J. 1995. Heritage as Planned and Conserved in Herbert, D. (ed.) Heritage, Tourism, and Society. London: Pinter Press.

Larkham, P. J. 1996. Conservation and the City. London: Routledge.

Listokin, D., B. Listokin & M. Lahr. 1998. The Contributions of Historic Preservation to Housing and Economic Development. Housing Policy Debate 9(3):431-478.

Nasser, N. 2003. “Planning for Urban Heritage Places: Reconciling Conservation, Tourism, and Sustainable Development.” Journal of Planning Literature 17(4):467-479.

Neuman, M. 2005. "Notes on The Uses and Scope of City Planning Theory." Planning Theory 4(2): 123-145.

Sandercock, L. 1998. Towards Cosmopolis. London: John Wiley & Sons.

Sandercock, L. 2002. Cosmopolis II: Mongrel City. London: John Wiley & Sons.

Sanyal, B. 2005. Comparative Planning Cultures. New York & London: Routledge.

Soegijoko, B. T. S. 2006. Building a Creative Community for City Development: The Case of Bandung in Seminar Proceeding of International Seminar on Urban Culture Arte-Polis: Creative Culture and the Making of Place. Bandung: Department of Architecture, School of Architecture, Planning and Policy Development, ITB.

Steinberg, F. 1996. Conservation and Rehabilitation of Urban Heritage in Developing Countries. Habitat International 20(3):463-475.

Throgmorton, J. A. 2003. "Planning as Persuasive Storytelling in A Global-Scale Web of Relationships." Planning Theory 2(2): 125-151.

Watson, V. 2006. "Deep Difference: Diversity, Planning and Ethics." Planning Theory 5(1): 31-50.

Yale, P. 1992. From Tourist Attractions to Heritage Tourism. Hutingdon: ELM Publications.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2019 Journal of Regional and City Planning