The Behavioral Response of Komodo Dragons (Va- ranus komodoensis OUWENS, 1912) During Mating and Nesting Periods towards Tourist Presence in Loh Buaya, Komodo National Park
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5614/3bio.2023.5.1.2Keywords:
wildlife tourism, Komodo, reproductive behavior, habituationAbstract
It has been recognized in many studies that wildlife tourism practices might generate a negative impact on wildlife, particularly during the reproductive period. Some wildlife may lower their sensitivity towards tourist presence, for instance in Komodo. Understanding to what extenthabituation occurs in Komodo would be necessary for tourism management in Komodo National Park (KNP). Therefore, this study aimed to identify the response of Komodo to tourist presence during mating and nesting activities. The observation was conducted in Loh Buaya, which is one of the tourism sites in KNP. Komodo?s responses were divided into (1) avoidance; (2) neutral; and (3) aggressive under categorized stimulus: tourist number (i.e., < 5 persons; 5-10 persons; and > 10 persons) and distance (i.e., < 5 m; 5-10 m; and > 10 m). Correlation analysis was performed to identify any influences on mating and nesting activities. Our results revealed that Komodo inhabiting tourism facilities havebeen habituated to tourist presence. Different tourist frequencies did not influence Komodo mating activities (r(20)= 0.036, p=0.873), the nest preparing activity (i.e., digging proportion; r(22)= 0.054, p=0.803) and the guarding activity (i.e., nesting proportion; r(22)= 0.314, p=0.135).Nevertheless, our results indicated possible impacts due to tourism activities and its supporting facilities, such as dominated mating pairs, threats to female reproductive success, and human-Komodo conflicts. Therefore, habituation evi- dence must be carefully considered in order todevelop more corresponding strategies and achieve sustainable tourism practices.
References
] Reynolds PC, Braithwaite D. Towards a conceptual framework for wildlife tourism. Tourism Management. 2001;22(1):31?42.
] Chin CLM, Moore SA, Wallington TJ. Ecotourism in Bako national park. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 2000;8(1):20?35.
] Wolf ID, Croft DB. Minimizing disturbance to wildlife by tourists approaching on foot or in a car: A study of kangaroos in the Australian rangelands. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 2010;126(1?2):75?84.
] Walpole MJ. Feeding dragons in Komodo National Park: A tourism tool with conservation complications. Animal Conservation. 2001;4(1):67?73.
] Boutin S. Food supplementation experiments with ter- restrial vertebrates: patterns, problems, and the future. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 1990;68(2):203?20.
] Orams MB. Feeding wildlife as a tourism attraction: A review of issues and impacts. Tourism Management. 2002;23(3):281?93.
] Lindsay K, Craig J, Low M. Tourism and conservation: The effects of track proximity on avian reproductive success and nest selection in an open sanctuary. Tourism Management. 2008;29(4):730?9.
] Bolduc F, Guillemette M. Human disturbance and nesting success of Common Eiders: Interaction between visitors and gulls. Biological Conservation. 2003;110(1):77?83.
] Frid, Alejandro, Dill L. Human-caused Disturbance Stimuli as a Form of Predation Risk. Conservation Ecol- ogy. 2002;6(1):11.
] Amo L, Lez P, Mart J. Nature-based tourism as a form of predation risk affects body condition and health state of Podarcis muralis lizards. Biological Conserva- tion. 2006;131(3):402?9.
] Griffin SC, Valois T, Taper ML, Scott Mills L. Effects of tourists on behavior and demography of olympic mar- mots. Conservation Biology. 2007;21(4):1070?81.
] Mart J, Lez P, Cooper WE. Loss of mating oppor- tunities influences refuge use in the Iberian rock lizard, Lacerta monticola. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiolo-
gy. 2003;54(5):505?10.
] Rodruez-Prieto I, Mart J, Ferndez-Juricic E. Ha- bituation to low-risk predators improves body condi- tion in lizards. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 2010;64(12):1937?45.
] Whittaker D, Knight RL. Understanding wildlife respons- es to humans. Wildlife Society Bulletin. 1998;26(2):312? 7.
] White LA, Gehrt SD. Coyote attacks on humans in the United States and Canada. Human Dimensions of Wild- life. 2009;14(6):419?32.
] Woodford MH, Butynski TM, Karesh WB. Habituating the great apes: The disease risks. Oryx. 2002;36(2):153? 60.
] Bejder L, Samuels A, Whitehead H, Finn H, Allen S. Impact assessment research: Use and misuse of habitu- ation, sensitisation and tolerance in describing wildlife responses to anthropogenic stimuli. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2009;395(May 2014):177?85.
] Rankin CH, Abrams T, Barry RJ, Bhatnagar S, Clayton DF, Colombo J, et al. Habituation revisited: An updated and revised description of the behavioral characteristics of habituation. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory. 2009;92(2):135?8.
] Doran-Sheehy, Diane M, Derby, Abigail M, Greer, Da- vid, Mongo P. Habituation of Western Gorillas: The Pro- cess and Factors That Influence It. American Journal of Primatology. 2007;69:1354?1369.
] Ciofi, Claudio, de Boer ME. Distribution and Conser- vation of the Komodo Monitor (Varanus komodoensis). Herpetological Journal. 2004;14(2):99?107.
] Purwandana D, Ariefiandy A, Imansyah MJ, Rudiharto H, Seno A, Ciofi C, et al. Demographic status of Komodo dragons populations in Komodo National Park. Biologi- cal Conservation. 2014;171:29?35.
] Ariefiandy A, Purwandana D, Natali C, Imansyah MJ, Surahman M, Jessop TS, et al. Conservation of Komodo dragons Varanus komodoensis in the Wae Wuul nature reserve, Flores, Indonesia: A multidisciplinary approach. International Zoo Yearbook. 2015;49(1):67?80.
] Badan Pusat Statistik. Pengunjung Taman Nasional Ko- modo Tahun 2015-2018 [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://manggaraibaratkab.bps.go.id/indicator/16/35/1/ pengunjung.html
] Auffenberg W. The Behavioural Ecology of the Komodo Monitor. Gainesville: University of Florida Press; 1981.
] Ardiantiono, Jessop TS, Purwandana D, Ciofi C, Jeri Imansyah M, Panggur MR, et al. Effects of human ac- tivities on Komodo dragons in Komodo National Park. Biodiversity and Conservation. 2018;27(13):3329?47.
] Jessop TS, Imansyah MJ, Purwandana D, Ariefiandy A, Rudiharto H, Seno A, et al. Ekologi Populasi, Reproduk- si dan Spasial Biawak Komodo (Varanus komodoensis) di Taman Nasional Komodo, Indonesia. Labuan Bajo;
] Jessop TS, Sumner J, Rudiharto H, Purwandana D, Iman- syah MJ, Phillips JA. Distribution, use and selection of nest type by Komodo Dragons. Biological Conservation. 2004;117(5):463?70.
] Lehner PN. Handbook of Ethological Methods. 2nd edi- tion. Cambrige: Cambrige University Press; 1996.
] Ciofi C, Puswati J, Winana D, De Boer ME, Chelazzi G, Sastrawan P. Preliminary analysis of home range struc- ture in the Komodo monitor, Varanus komodoensis. Co- peia. 2007;2007(2):462?70.
] Krebs, J., R., Davies, N. B. An Introduction to Behavior- al Ecology. 3rd editio. Oxford: Blackwell; 1993.
] Rismiller PD, McKelvey MW, Green B. Breeding phe- nology and behavior of Rosenberg?s Goanna (Varanus rosenbergi) on Kangaroo Island, South Australia. Journal of Herpetology. 2010;44(3):399?408.
] Clutton-Brock TH, Parker GA. Sexual coercion in ani- mal societies. Animal Behaviour. 1995;49(5):1345?65.
] Gill, Jennifer A, Norris, Ken, Sutherland WJ. Why be- havioural responses may not reflect the population conse- quences of human disturbance. Biological Conservation. 2001;97:265?8.
] Giese M. Effects of human activity on adelie penguin Pygoscelis adeliae breeding success. Biological Conser- vation. 1996;75(2):157?64.
] Budowski G. Tourism and Environmental Conservation: Conflict, Coexistence, or Symbiosis? Environmental Conservation. 1976;3(1):27?31.
] Kamal KB, Boug A, Brain PF. Effects of food provision- ing on the behaviour of commensal hamadryas baboons, papio hamadryas, at al hada mountain in western saudi arabia. Zoology in the Middle East. 1997;14(1):11?22.
] Hinde RA. Animal signals: Ethological and games-theo- ry approaches are not incompatible. Animal Behaviour. 1981;29(2):535?42.
] Saltz D, Berger-Tal O, Motro U, Shkedy Y, Raanan N. Conservation implications of habituation in Nubian ibex in response to ecotourism. Anim Conserv. 2019 Jun 1;22(3):220?7.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Aditya Dimas Pramudya, Achmad Sjarmidi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
