The Spread of Rumors in Society: A Mathematical Modeling Approach in Election Case Studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5614/cbms.2022.7.2.3Keywords:
Rumor spread, mathematical model, different attitudes toward rumors, election, campaign strategyAbstract
Rumors can be defined as unverified information or statements shared by people that may be positive or negative and circulate without confirmation. Since humans naturally seek factual information for social and self-enhancement purposes, rumors become an inevitable aspect of human life, including in politics, such as elections. The complexity of the electoral process, with various factors such as individual candidates, social circumstances, and particularly the media, leads to the dynamic spread of rumors in society. Thus, it is both interesting and important to understand the dynamics of rumor spreading, particularly in the context of elections. In this article, we formulate a mathematical model of rumor spread dynamics based on different attitudes of people toward rumors. The model considers the spread of rumors about two candidates in the electoral context. From the model, we derived and investigated the basic reproductive number (R0) as a threshold for rumor spread and conducted a sensitivity analysis with respect to all the model parameters. Based on numerical experiments and simulations, it was revealed that the number of people resistant to or disbelieving in rumors increases significantly in the first ten days and remains higher than other subpopulations for at least after first seven days. Furthermore, we found that a high number of people directly affected by rumors, combined with the rumor transmission rate for both candidates being greater than each other, are necessary and sufficient conditions for rumors to circulate rapidly and remain stable in society. The results of this study can be interpreted and considered as a campaign strategy in an electoral context.
References
DiFonzo, N. and Bordia, P., Rumor psychology: social and organizational approaches, American Psychological Association, 2007.
Weeks, B.E. and Garrett, R.K., Electoral consequences of political rumors: motivated reasoning, candidate rumors, and vote choice during the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 26(4), pp. 401-422, 2014.
Ewe, K., The ultimate election year: all the elections around the world in 2024, TIME. https://time.com/6550920/world-elections-2024/, Accessed on December 28, 2023.
Buchholz, K., The super election year, Statista.https://www.statista.com/chart/31604/countries-where-a-national-election-is-was-held-in-2024/, Accessed on January 19, 2024.
Ray, S., Is the biggest election year in history?here are the countries going to the polls this year, Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/siladityaray/2024/01/03/2024-is-the-biggest-election-year-in-history-here-are-the-countries-going-to-the-polls-this-year/?sh=62ac129065f9, Accessed on January 3, 2024.
Utych, S.M. and Kam, C.D., Viability, information seeking, and vote choice, what voters learn from media, The Journal of Politics, 76(1), pp. 152-166, 2014.
Abramowitz, A.I., Viability, electability, and candidate choice in a Presidential Primary Election: a tesf of competing models, The Journal of Politics, 51(4), pp. 977-992, 1989.
Rickershauser, J. and Aldrich, J.H., ?It?s the electability, stupid?-or maybe not? electability, substance, and strategic voting in presidential primaries, Electoral Studies, 26(2), pp. 371-380, 2007.
Hassell, H.J.G. and Visalvanich, N., Perceptions of electability: candidate (and Voter) ideology, race, and gender, Political Behavior, pp. 1-24, 2024.
Bartels, L.M., Presidential primaries and the dynamics of public choice, Pricenton University Press, 1988.
Reilly, S. and Ulbig, S.G., The resilient voter: stressful polling place and voting behavior, Lexington Books, 2018.
Weaver, D.H., What voters learn from media, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546(1), pp. 34-47, 1996.
Sakti, R.E., Social media influences voters in the 2024 election, Kompas. https://www.kompas.id/baca/english/2023/12/14/en-media-sosial-pengaruhi-pemilih-pada-pemilu-2024, Accessed on December 14, 2023.
Bukari, Z., Hamid, A.B., Som, H.M., Uzir, M.U., Bashiru, S., Agyepong, L., Tsagli, S.K. and Al Halbusi, H., Determinants of voters behaviour and voting intention: the mediating role of social media, Cogent Business & Management, 10(2), p. 2140492, 2023.
Zubiaga, A., Liakata, M., Procter, R., Hoi, G.W.S. and Tolmie, P., Analysing how people orient to and spread rumours in social media by looking at conversational threads, PLoS ONE, 11(3), p. e0150989, 2016.
Daley, D.J. and Kendall, D.G., Epidemics and rumours, Nature, 204(4963), pp. 1118-1118, 1964.
Zhao, L., Wang, J., Chen, Y., Wang, Q., Cheng, J. and Cui, H., SHIR rumor spreading model in social network, Physica A, 391(7), pp. 2444-2453, 2012.
Xia, L., Jiang, G., Song, B. and Song, Y., Rumor spreading model considering hesitating mechanism in complex social network, Physica A, 437, pp. 295-303, 2015.
Yu, S., Yu, Z., Jiang, H., Mei, X., and Li, J., The spread and control rumors in a multilingual environment, Nonlinear Dynamics, 100, pp. 2933-2951, 2020.
Guo, H., Yan, X., Niu, Y. and Zhang, J., Dynamic analysis of rumor propagation model with media report and time delay on social network, Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing, 69(3), pp. 2473-2502, 2023.
Bodaghi, A., Goliaei, S. and Salehi, M., The number of followings as an influential factor in rumor spreading, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 357, pp. 167-184, 2019.
Huang, H., Pan, J., and Chen, Y., The competitive diffusion of knowledge and rumor in a multiplex network: a mathematical model, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 475, p. 128719, 2024.
Chen, M. and Srivastava, H.M., On a rumor propagation model with spatial heterogeneity, Qualitative Theory of Dynamical Systems, 23(1), p. 1, 2024.
Darr, J.P. and Stiles, R.L., Should campaigns respond to electability arguments?, Journal of Political Marketing, 21(1), pp. 41-55, 2022.
Newman, B.I. and Sheth, J.N., A model of primary voter behavior, Journal of Consumer Research, 12(2), pp. 178-187, 1985.
Kennedy, I., Wack, M., Beers, A., Schafer, J.S., Camargo, I.G., Spiro, E.S., and Starbird, K., Repeat spreaders and election delegitimization: a comprehensive dataset of misinformation tweets from the 2020 U.S. Election, Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media, 2, pp. 1-49, 2022.
Davis, O.A., Hinich, M.J. and Ordeshook, P.C., An expository development of a mathematical model of the electoral process, The American Political Science Review, 64(2), pp. 426-448, 1970.
Hu, Y., Pan, Q., Hou, W., and He, M., Rumor spreading model with the different attitudes towards rumors, Physica A, 502, pp. 331-344, 2018.
Konigslow, K.K., Voting behavior and communication, The international encyclopedia of political communication, Gianpietro, M., eds., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2015.
Klingelhofer, J., The swing voters? blessing, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 174, pp. 380-401, 2020.
Lundberg, K.B. and Payne, B.K., Decisions among the undecided: implicit attitudes predict future voting behavior of undecided voters, PLoS ONE, 9(1), p. e85680, 2014.
Driessche, P.V. and Watmough, J., Reproduction Numbers and Sub-threshold Endemic Equilibria for Compartmental Models of Disease Transmission, Mathematical Biosciences, 180(1-2), pp. 29-48, 2002.
Diekmann, O., Heesterbeek, J.A.P, and Roberts, M.G., The Contruction of Next-generation Matrices for Compartmental Epidemic
Models, Journal of The Royal Society, 7(47), pp. 873-885, 2010.
File, T. and Crissey, S., Voting and registration in the election of November 2008, Current Population Reports, Population Characteristics, pp. 1-17, 2012.
Alvarez, R.M., Ansolabehere, S., Berinsky, A., Lenz, G., Stewart III, C. and Hall, T., 2008 Survey of the performance of American Elections, Final Report, Department of Political Science, The Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts, 2009.
Martcheva, M., An introduction to mathematical epidemiology, Springer, 2015.
Google Trends, https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=2008-09-26%202008-11-04&geo=US&q=%2Fm%2F02mjmr,%2Fm%2F0bymv&hl=en, Accessed on October 28, 2023.
Lee, I., Chen, E.E., Tsai, C., Yen, N., Chen, A.L.P. and Lin, W.C., Voting intention and choices: are voters always rational and deliberative?, PLoS ONE, 11(2), p. e0148643, 2016.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Communication in Biomathematical Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
