Surfactant-Polymer Coreflood Simulation and Uncertainty Analysis Derived from Laboratory Study

Authors

  • Farizal Hakiki OGRINDO Research Consortium, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Petrol. Eng. Bldg, Level 2, Jalan Ganesha No. 10, Bandung 40132,
  • Dara Ayuda Maharsi Petroleum Engineering Study Program, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jalan Ganesha No. 10, Bandung 40132,
  • Taufan Marhaendrajana Petroleum Engineering Study Program, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jalan Ganesha No. 10, Bandung 40132,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2015.47.6.9

Abstract

This paper presents a numerical simulation study on coreflood scale derived from a laboratory study conducted on light oil and water-wet sandstone samples from fields at Tempino and Kenali Asam, Sumatra, Indonesia. A rigorous laboratory study prompted a specified surfactant type among dozens of screened samples, i.e. AN3NS and AN2NS-M for Kenali Asam and Tempino, respectively. The coreflood scale numerical simulation study was performed using a commercial simulator, on the basis of the results from the laboratory study, at a constant temperature of 68C, 0.3 cc/min injection rate and under 120 psia confining pressure. To get better recovery, the cores were tested using surfactant and polymer in a blended mode, containing 0.03% w/w polymer diluted in each field brine, which accommodated around 8000 ppm salinity. The most significant variable in the multiphase flow is the relative permeability curve, which is affected by interfacial tension (IFT) during waterflooding and surfactant-polymer (SP) flooding. This study shows that relative permeability will be shifted at ultra-low IFT (10-3 to 10-4 mN/m). This shifting phenomenon is governed by the interpolation parameter set, which implicitly represents the capillary number. Further work in matching the numerical results to the coreflood was conducted by changing the interpolation parameters.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Adasani, A & Bai, B., Recent Developments and Updated Screening Criteria of Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques, Paper SPE-130726-MS. Presented at International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China, 8-10 June, 2010, Beijing, China. DOI:10.2118/130726-MS

Austad, T., Fjelde, I., Veggeland K. & Taugb",l K., Physicochemical Principles of Low Tension Polymer Flood, J Petrol Sci Eng, 10, pp. 255-269, 1994. DOI:10.1016/0920-4105(94)90085-X

Samanta, A, Ojha, K, Sarkar, A. & Mandal, A., Surfactant and Surfactant-Polymer Flooding for Enhanced Oil Recovery, Advances in Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2(1), pp. 13-18, 2011. DOI: 10.3968/j.aped.1925543820110201.608

Gurgel, A., Moura, A. & Dantas, C., A Review on Chemical Flooding Methods Applied in Enhanced Oil Recovery, Brazilian Journal of Petroleum and Gas, 2(2), pp. 83-95, 2008.

Rai, S. K., Bera, A. & Mandal, A., Modeling of Surfactant and Surfactant-Polymer Flooding for Enhanced Oil Recovery using STARS (CMG) Software, J Petrol. Explor. Prod. Technol., 24 February 2014. DOI: 10.1007/s13202-014-0112-3

Samanta, A., Bera, A., Ojh, K. & Mandal, A., Comparative Studies on Enhanced Oil Recovery by Alkali-Surfactant and Polymer Flooding, Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 2(2), pp. 67-74, 2012. DOI: 10.1007/s13202-012-0021-2

Moore, T.F. & Slobod, R.C., Displacement of Oil by Water-Effect of Wettability, Rate, and Viscosity on Recovery, Paper SPE 502-G. Presented at the SPE Annual Fall Meeting, New Orleans, 2-5 October 1955. DOI:10.2118/502-G

Sheng, J.J., Modern Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery: Theory and Practice, Gulf Professional Publishing, Massachusetts, 2010.

Van Quy, N. & Labrid, J., A Numerical Study of Chemical Flooding--Comparison with Experiments, Paper SPE 10202. Presented at the 1981 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Soc. Pet. Eng. J., 1983. DOI:10.2118/10202-PA

Shen, P., Zhu, B., Li, X. & Wu, Y., The Influence of Interfacial Tension on Water/Oil Two-Phase Relative Permeability, PaperSPE-95405-MS. Presented at the 2006 SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Tulsa, 22-26 April 2006. DOI:10.2118/95405-MS

Lawson, R.G. & Hirasaki, G.J., Analysis of The Physical Mechanisms in Surfactant Flooding, Paper SPE-6003. Presented at the SPE-AIME 51st Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Soc. Pet. Eng. J., pp. 3-6, 1983. DOI:10.2118/6003-PA

Asar, H. & Handy, L.L., Influence of Interfacial Tension on Gas-Oil Relative Permeability in a Gas-Condensate System. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 1988. DOI:10.2118/11740-PA

Regina, A., Rate Optimization of Surfactant Flooding for 5-Spot Pattern in Tempino Field, MSc Thesis. Petroleum Engineering Study Program, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia, 2014.

Maharsi, D.A., Optimisation of Surfactant-Polymer Injection in Kenali Asam Field Using 5-Spot Injection Pattern. MSc Thesis. Petroleum Engineering Study Program, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia, 2015.

Pope, G.A., Wu, W., Narayanaswamy, G., Delshad, M., Sharma, M.M. & Wang, P., Modeling Relative Permeability Effects in Gas-Condensate Reservoirs With a New Trapping Model, Paper SPE 62497-PA. SPE Journal, 2000. DOI:10.2118/62497-PA

John, A., Han, C., Delshad, M., Pope, G.A. & Sepehrnoori, K., A New Generation Chemical Flooding Simulator, Paper SPE 89436.Presented atthe SPE/DOE 14th Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Tulsa, OK, 17-21 April, 2014.DOI:10.2118/89436-MS

Patacchini, L., De Loubens, R. & Moncorge, A., Four-Fluid-Phase, Fully Implicit Simulation of Surfactant Flooding, Paper SPE 161630. Presented at the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 11-14 November 2012. DOI:10.2118/161630-MS

Computer Modelling Group Ltd. STARS, 13 User's Guide. Calgary, Canada, 2009.

Mishra, S., Bera, A. & Mandal, A., Effect of Polymer Adsorption on Permeability Reduction in Enhanced Oil Recovery, Journal of Petroleum Engineering 2014, pp.1-9, 2014. DOI: 10.1155/2014/395857

Swadesi, B., Marhaendrajana, T., Siregar, S. & Mucharam, L., The Effect of Surfactant Characteristics on IFT to Improve Oil Recovery in Tempino Light Oil Field Indonesia, J. Eng. Technol. Sci., 47 (3) pp. 250-265, 2015. DOI: 10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2015.47.3.2

Alsofi, A.M., Liu, J.S. & Han, M., Numerical Simulation of Surfactant-Polymer Coreflooding Experiments for Carbonates, J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 111, pp. 184-196, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2013.09.009

Hernandez, C., Chacon, L.J., Anselmi, L., Baldonedo, A., Qi, J., Dowling, P.C. & Pitts, M.J., ASP System Design for an Offshore Application in La Salina Field, Lake Maracaibo, SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 6 (3), pp. 147-156, 2003. DOI: 10.2118/84775-PA

Huh, C. & Pope, G.A., Residual Oil Saturation from Polymer Floods: Laboratory Measurements and Theoretical Interpretation, Paper SPE 113417MS. Presented at the SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Tulsa, OK, 19-23 April 2008. DOI: 10.2118/113417-MS

Downloads

Published

2015-12-31

How to Cite

Hakiki, F., Maharsi, D. A., & Marhaendrajana, T. (2015). Surfactant-Polymer Coreflood Simulation and Uncertainty Analysis Derived from Laboratory Study. Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences, 47(6), 706-725. https://doi.org/10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2015.47.6.9

Issue

Section

Articles