The Evolution of Seismic Design Provisions in Indonesia's National Bridge Code
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2022.54.6.14Keywords:
bridge design code, ductility, existing bridges, moment-rotation, performance level, seismic hazardAbstract
To accommodate increased seismic hazards in Indonesia, provisions regarding structural details on seismic regulations have been tightened. In this paper, the variations in seismic hazard and detailing requirements from bridge code era before 1990 to the present was provided. To examine the bridge performance, pushover analysis was carried out based on the latest bridge code SNI 2833:2016/Seismic Map 2017. From the analysis results, the performance of older bridges would typically be less than more recently designed structures. The performance level of the bridge in the era before SNI 2833:2016/Seismic Map 2017 will be Operational-Life Safety (LS) whereas the performance level of the bridge designed with SNI 2833:2016 will be Elastic ? Operational. Referring to NCHRP 949 for bridge performance level evaluation, results show that the performance level of the bridge still satisfies the requirement, which is Life Safety under upper-level earthquake. Therefore, the existing bridge shows adequate capacity under the current seismic load Seismic Map 2017 (7% probability of exceedance in 75 years (RP= 1000 years)). Evaluation of seismic vulnerability needs to be done to ensure the safety of the existing bridges in Indonesia, most of which are located in earthquake-prone areas, especially those that were designed with older version regulations.
Downloads
References
Choi, E., DesRoches, R. & Nileson, B., Seismic Fragility of Typical Bridges in Moderate Seismic Zone, Eng. Struct., 26, pp. 187-199, 2004. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.09.006.
Mitchell, Evolution of Seismic Design Provisions in the National Building Code of Canada, Canadian Journal of Civil Enginnering, 37(9), pp. 1157-1170, 2010. DOI: 10.1139/L10-054.
Ramanatan, K., DesRoches, R. & Padgett, J.E., A Comparison of Pre-and Post-Seismic Design Considerations in Moderate Seismic Zones Through The Fragility Assessment of Multispan Bridge Classes, Eng. Struct., 45, pp. 559-573, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.07.004.
Simon, J. & Vigh, L.G., Seismic Fragility Assessment of Integral Precast Multi-Span Bridges in Areas of Moderate Seismicity, Bull. Earthq. Eng., 14(7), 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s10518-016-9947-y.
Ministry of Public Works, Indonesia Earthquake Source and Hazard Map 2002, 2002.
Ministry of Public Works, Indonesia Earthquake Source and Hazard Map 2010, 2010.
Ministry of Public Works and Housing, Indonesia Earthquake Source and Hazard Map 2017, National Earthquake Study Center, 2017.
Directorate General of Highways Ministry of Public Works and Housing, Indonesia [https://data.pu.go.id].(26 July 2021).
Building Problem Research Board, Indonesian Load Regulations 1970, NI 18, 1969.
Department of Public Works, Bridge Management System (BMS) 1992.
Ministry of Public Works, Guidelines for Bridge Design for Earthquake Loads, PdT-04-2004-B.
Indonesian National Standard, Bridge Design for Earthquake Loads, SNI 2833:2008, 2008.
Indonesian National Standard, Bridge Design for Earthquake Loads, SNI 2833:2016, 2016.
Irsyam, M., Asrurifak, M, Mikhail, R., Wahdiny I., Rustiani, S. & Munirwansyah, Development of Nationwide Vs30 Map and Calibrated Conversion Table for Indonesia using Automated Topographical Classification, Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences, 49(4), pp. 457-471, 2017. DOI: 10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2017.49.4.3.
Sengara I. W., Sidhi, I. D., Mulia, A, Asrurifak, M. & Hutabarat, D., Development of Risk Coefficient for Input to New Indonesian Seismic Building Codes, Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences, 48(1), pp. 49-65, 2016. DOI: 10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2016.48.1.5.
Misliniyati, R., Sahadewa, A., Hendriyawan, & Irsyam, M., Parametric Study of One-Dimensional Seismic Site Response Analyses Based on Local Soil Condition of Jakarta, Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences, 51(3), pp. 392-410, 2019. DOI: 10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci. 2019.51.3.7.
TRC/Imbsen, XTRACT: Cross Section Analysis Software for Structural and Earthquake Engineering, 2010.
Mander, J.B. Priestley M.J.N. & Park. R., Theoretical Stress-Strain Model for Confined Concrete, J.Struct.Eng, 114(8), pp. 1804-1824, August 1988.
ATC 72-1, Modelling and Acceptance Criteria for Seismic Design and Analysis of Tall Buildings, PEER/ATC, 2010.
Maison, B.F. & Speicher, M.S., Loading Protocols for ASCE 41 Backbone Curves. Earthquake Spectra, 2016. DOI: 10.1193/010816EQS007EP
Chopra, A.K. & Goel, R., A Modal Pushover Analysis Procedure for Estimating Seismic Demands for Buildings, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31(5), pp. 561-582, 2002.
Transportation Research Board of The National Academies, Performance-Based Seismic Bridge Design NCHRP Synthesis 440, Washington: Transportation Research Board, 2013.
Zhang, Q & Alam, M.S., Performance-Based Seismic Design f Bridges: A Global Perspective and Critical Review of Past, Present and Future Directions, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 15(4), pp. 539-554, 2019. DOI: 10.1080/15732479.2018.1558269
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering & Medicine, NCHRP 949 Research Report ? Proposed AASHTO Guidelines for Performance-Based Seismic Bridge Design, Washington, 2020.
Marsh, ML.,, LRFD Seismic Analysis and Design of Bridges Reference Manual (Publication No. FHWANHI-15-004), Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, 2014.
Lim, E., Kusumastuti, D., Rildova, Asneindram, M. & Mulyadi, S.S., Performance Based Evaluation of an Existing Continuous Reinforced Concrete Bridge-A Case Study., E3S Web of Conference, 331, pp. 0500 8, 2021. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202133105008
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design, in Subcommittee T-3 for Seismic Effects on Bridges, USA, 2011.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specification, 9th Edition, Washington, USA, 2020.
.png){kind=logo}
