Decay Resistance of Medium Density Fibreboard (MDF) Made from Pineapple Leaf Fiber


  • Yuliati Indrayani Faculty of Forestry, Tanjungpura University
  • Dina Setyawati Faculty of Forestry, Tanjungpura University
  • Tsuyoshi Yoshimura Research Institute for Sustainable Humanosphere (RISH), Kyoto University, Uji, Kyoto 611-0011, Japan
  • Kenji Umemura Research Institute for Sustainable Humanosphere (RISH), Kyoto University, Uji, Kyoto 611-0011, Japan



decay resistance, Fomitopsis palustris, medium density fiberboard (MDF), phenol resin (PF), pineapple leaf fiber, Trametes versicolor.


Medium density fiberboard (MDF) production is increasing due to the development of manufacturing technologies. MDF products are utilized for traditional wood applications that require fungal resistance. This study investigated some of the important biodegradation properties of MDF composite board made from renewable biomass from pineapple leaf fiber (Ananas comosus). The variable factors were type of board and type of resin. Two different types of board with a target density of 0.8 g/cm3 were manufactured. The boards were prepared in three layers of about 1:1:1 weight ratio in crossoriented and unidirectional pattern, using low molecular weight (LM) phenol formaldehyde (PF) resin type PL-3725 and high molecular weight (HM) PF resin type PL-2818 for impregnation and adhesive purposes. Decay resistance (white and brown rot fungi) of the MDF was evaluated to assess its biological performance. In this study, fiber orientation had no effect on the decay resistance to white and brown rot fungi of the specimens. However, a slight increase was found for the mass loss of the low molecular weight PF resin board specimens compared with the mixed low and high molecular PF resin board specimens. The total resin content of 20% of the type I boards prohibits degradation by decay.


Kartal, S.N. & Frederick, G., Decay and Termite Resistance of Medium Density Fiberboard (MDF) made from Different Wood Species, Journal of International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 51, pp. 29-35, 2003.

Grigoriou, A. & Passialis, C., Voulgaridis, E., Experimental Particle Boards from Kenaf Plantations Grow in Greece, Holz Roh Werkst, 58, pp. 309-314, 2000.

Lee, M.H., Park, H.S., Yoon, K.J. & Hauser, P.J., Enhncing the Durability of Linen-like Properties of Low Temperature Merceized Cotton, Text Res J, 74(2), pp. 146-154, 2004.

Nobuhisa, O. & Masatoshi, S., Manufacture and Mechanical Properties of Binderless Boards from Kenaf Core, J Wood Sci, 50(1), pp. 53-61, 2004.

Indrayani, Y., Gustan, P. & Adi, S., Termite Resistance of Medium Density Fiberboard (MDF) Made from Agricultural Fiber, Proceedings of The 2nd International Symposium of Indonesian Wood Research Society, pp. 130-134, 2010. Bali, Indonesia.

Munawar, S.S., Kenji, U. & Suichi, K., Manufacture of Oriented Board Using Mild Steam Treatment of Plant Fiber Bundles, J. Wood Scie, 54(5), pp. 369-376, 2008.

Chung, W.Y., Wi, S.G. & Bae, H.J., Microscopic Observation of Wood-based Composites Exposed to Fungal Deterioration, Journal of Wood Science, 45(1), pp. 64-68, 1999.

Walther, T., Sueb, N.K., Won, J.H., Kenji, U. & Shuichi, K., Strength, Decay and Termite Resistance of Oriented Kenaf Fiberboards, Journal of Wood Science, 53(6), pp. 481-486, 2007.

Japanese Industrial Standards JIS K 1571, Test Methods for Determining the Effectiveness of Wood Preservatives and Their Performance Requirements, 2004. Tokyo, Japan.

Curling, S.F. & Murphy, R.J., The Effect of Artificial Ageing on the Durability of Wood-Based Boards Materials Against Basidiomycetes Decay Fungi. Journal of Wood Science and Technology, 33(4), pp. 245-257, 1999.

Park, B.D., Riedl, B., Hsu, E.W. & Shields, J., Application of Cure-Accelerated Phenol-Formaldehyde (PF) Adhesives for Three-LayerMedium Density Fibreboard (MDF) Manufacture, Wood Sci. Technol, 35(4), pp. 311-323, 2001.

Hafizah, N.W., Tahir, P.M., Hoong, Y.B., Ashaari, Z., Yunus, N.Y.M., Uyup, M.K.A. & Shahri, M.H., Adhesion Characteristics of Phenol Formaldehyde Pre-preg Oil Palm Stem Veneers, BioResources, 7(4), pp. 4545-4562, 2012.