Analyzing the Interaction of Andrographolide and Neoandrographolide, Diterpenoid Compounds From Andrographis Paniculata (Burm.F) Nees, to Cyclooxygenase-2 Enzyme by Docking Simulation

Authors

  • Jutti Levita 1 School of Pharmacy, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jl. Ganesha 10 Bandung 40116, West Java, Indonesia
  • Enade P. Istyastono 2 Faculteit der Exacte Wetenschappen, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1083, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • As'ari Nawawi 1 School of Pharmacy, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jl. Ganesha 10 Bandung 40116, West Java, Indonesia
  • Abdul Mutholib 3BATAN Serpong, Indonesia
  • Iwan J. P. de Esch 2 Faculteit der Exacte Wetenschappen, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1083, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Slamet Ibrahim 1 School of Pharmacy, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jl. Ganesha 10 Bandung 40116, West Java, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5614/itbj.sci.2009.41.2.5

Abstract

Cyclooxygenase (COX), an enzyme involved in the conversion of arachidonic acid to prostaglandins, exists in two isoforms, which are COX-1 and COX-2. Despite the similarities of COX-1 and COX-2, the two isoforms show subtle differences in amino acid composition at the active sites. Since COX-1 has isoleucine, a bulkier amino acid at position 523 than COX-2's valine, it allows COX-2 to have a larger space in its active site. Andrographolide reduces COX-2 expression induced by PAF and fMLP in HL60/neutrophils. Neoandrographolide inhibits COX-2 expression at the translational level. The purpose of this study is to examine the binding modes of andrographolide and neoandrographolide against COX-1 and COX-2 in terms of hydrogen bonds and docking energy, to understand their antiinflammatory property. The docking simulation indicates that both andrographolide and neoandrographolide are able to be located in the COX-2's binding pocket but not in the COX-1's. It confirms that COX-1's binding pocket is smaller than COX-2's. Based on this study, both andrographolide and neoandrographolide show selective inhibitory property to COX-2. Their selectivity are due to their specific interaction with Arg 513 in the binding pocket of COX-2, which is also shown by SC-558, a COX-2 selective inhibitor.

References

J.K., Gierse, J.J., McDonald, S.D., Hauser, S.H., Rangwala, C.M., Coboldt, and K., Seibert, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1996, 271 (26): 15810-15814.

G.F., Fabiola, L., Damodharan, V., Pattabhi, and K., Nagarajan, Current Science, 2001, 80: 26-34.

J.R., Vane, J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2000, 51 : 573-586.

J.A., Mitchell., T.D., Warner, Br. J. Pharmacol., 1999, 128 : 1121-1132

S.P., Dilber, S.Lj., Dobric, Z.D., Juranic, B.D., Markovic, S.M., Vladimirov, and I.O., Juranic, Molecules, 2008, 13 : 603-615.

T., Fujita, R., Fujitani, Y., Takeda, Y., Takaishi, T., Yamada, M., Kido, and I., Miura, Chem. Pham. Bull., 1984, 32 (6) : 2117-2125.

M.A., Hidalgo, et al, British Journal of Pharmacology, 2005, 144: 680-685.

J., Liu, Z.T., Wang, L.L., Ji, B.X., Ge, Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, 2007, 298(1-2): 49-57.

Downloads

Issue

Section

Articles