Social Equity in Urban Infrastructure Planning

. Sugiyantoro

Authors

. Sugiyantoro

Abstract

Social equity in urban infrastructure planning is important, especially where the infrastructure investment is high, and charging systems are applied: this will lead some people could not afford a fair delivery of services. The role of the planners is important to secure infrastructure delivery for the poor within the adopted and applied planning system in a respective country to anticipate the trend of privatization in production and delivery of infrastructure and services.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Azizi, M.M. 1995. The provision of urban infrastructure in Iran: An empirical evaluation. Urban Studies, 33: 507-522.

Beatly, Timothy. 1988. Equity and Distributional Issues in Infrastructure Planning: A Theoretical Perspective. In Public Infrastructure Planning and Management, ed. J. M. Stein. Newburry Park, Ca: Sage Publication.

Blakely, Edward, Melanie Fallon, and Stanley Hoffman. 2000. "Social Equity in Planning" . California Planning Roundtable. Available from http://www.cmcaplans.com/sprwww/docs/equity/02intro.htm. INTERNET

Boisvert, Michel and Lahouri Senaouci. 2000. Marginal privatization and infrastructural deficiencies: Anas and Lee revisited. Urban Studies, 37 (7): 1131-1144.

Checkoway, B. ed. 1994. Paul Davidoff and Advocacy Planning in Retrospect. Journal of the American Planning Association. Vol.60, Spring.

Davey, Kenneth. 1993. Managing Growing Cities. Options for Urban Government. Birmingham: Development Administration Group (DAG), Institute of Local Government Studies, The University of Birmingham.

Deakin, Elizabeth. 2000. "Social Equity in Planning" . Berkeley Planning Journal: Volume 12- Castles. Available from http://www.dcrp.ced.berkeley.edu/bpj/deakin13.htm. INTERNET

Feldman, R.D., R. Mudge and K.I. Rubin. 1988. Financing Infrastructure Tools for the Future. New York: Executive Enterprise, Inc.

Grange, Adrienne La. 1998. Privatizing Public Housing in Hong Kong: Its impact on equity. Housing Studies 13 (4): 507-525.

Healey, P. 1992. An institutional model of the land development process: a review. Journal of Property Research 9: 33-34

Kamerman, S. and A. Kahn. 1989. Privatization and the Welfare State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Krumholz, Norman and John Forester. 1990. Making Equity Planning Work: Leadership un the Public Sector.

Marvin, Simon and Simon Guy. 1997. Infrastructure Provision, Development Processes and the Co-production of Environmental Value. Urban Studies 34 (12): 2023-2036

Mattingly, M. 1995. Urban Management in Less Developed Countries. Working Paper, No. 72, Development Planning Unit, UCL, London

Papadakis E. and P. Taylor-Gooby. 1987. The private provision of public welfare, state market and community. Sussex: Wheat sheaf Books.

Rasinski, K. A. 1987. What's fair or is it? Values differences underlying public views about social justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53: 201-211.

Lucy, William. 1988. Equity Planning for Infrastructure: Applications. Pp. 227-240 in Public Infrastructure Planning and Management, ed. J.M. Stein. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publication.

Lucy, W. 1981. Equity and Planning for local services. Journal of the American Planning Association 47(4): 447-457.

Porter, D.R. (ed). 1986. Growth Management. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Land Institute.

Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Rondinelli, Dennis A. 1990. Decentralizing Urban Development Programmes. Washington, D.C.: USAID.

Syrne, G. J., B. E. Nancarrow and J. A. Mc. Creddin. 1999. Defininf the components of fairness in the allocation of water to environmental and human uses. Journal of environmental Management 57: 51-70

World Bank. 1994. World Development Report 1994: Infrastructure for Development. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.

Young, H. P. 1994. Equity: In Theory and Practice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.