Sustainability Perspectives on the Use of Nature Materials for Urban Areas Infrastructure

NICCO PLAMONIA; Farhan Junizal; Rony  Irawanto; I Nyoman Teguh Prasidha; Yustisia Firdaus

doi:10.5614/jts.2024.31.3.1

Authors

NICCO PLAMONIA Center for Environment and Clean Technology, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6308-7946
Farhan Junizal Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Pancasila, Jakarta Selatan, Indonesia
Rony Irawanto Center for Environment and Clean Technology, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Indonesia
I Nyoman Teguh Prasidha Master's Program in Infrastructure and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Pancasila, Jakarta Selatan, Indonesia
Yustisia Firdaus Center for Environment and Clean Technology, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5614/jts.2024.31.3.1

Keywords:

Sustainable act, cost efficiency, iron wood, andesite

Abstract

Abstract

Constructing a hotel have to include various facility. One of the many may a jogging track. We take the Aruss Hotel in Semarang, Central Java, as the case to be studied. The Hotel planned to use Ironwood as the material for the track due to its solid and resistant characteristics. However, using the wood material collectively adds more pressure to the rainforest. Therefore we propose to replace the Ironwood with andesite stone. The andesite material also has solid and resistant characteristics. We argue that materials usage should consider the sustainability aspect of materials and the Value for Money factor. Therefore, the objective of this article is to provide a perspective for decision-makers that includes the sustainability perspective and the VFM principle. We conducted two activities during the Research: (1) comparing the cost of both materials and (2) comparing the time consumed installing both materials. The analysis results are as follows: The cost of using andesite is 73% cheaper than Ironwood. We replaced the Ironwood with an andesite, which is proven to save IDR 307,031,041. Moreover, using the andesite only takes 13 working days, while Ironwood takes 36 days. We conclude that using andesite as the alternative to Ironwood has two advantages: (1) reducing the pressure on the natural forest, and (2) saving the construction cost.

References

Agustin, A., Plamonia, N., & Andreas, A. (2023). Analisis Perbandingan Volume dan Biaya Pada Pekerjaan Arsitektur. Jurnal ARTESIS, 3(2), 173?181.

Aprilio, R. M. E., & Plamonia, N. (2024). Desain Jaringan Perpipaan Pada Sistem Pengolahan Air Limbah Domestik Pulau Payung. Jurnal ARTESIS, 4(1), 9?16.

Artuch-Garde, R., Gonzez-Torres, M. del C., de La Fuente, J., Vera, M. M., Ferndez-Cabezas, M., & Lez-Garc, M. (2017). Relationship between resilience and self-regulation: a study of Spanish youth at risk of social exclusion. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 612.

Awaludin, A., Firmanti, A., Theodarmo, H., & Astuti, D. (2017). Wood frame floor model of LVL Paraserianthes falcataria. Procedia Engineering, 171, 113?120.

Busch, J., Dawson, D., & Roelich, K. (2017). Closing the low-carbon material loop using a dynamic whole system approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 149, 751?761.

Clark, R. M., Adams, J. Q., & Lykins Jr, B. W. (1994). DBP control in drinking water: cost and performance. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 120(4), 759?782.

Effendi, R. (2009). Kayu ulin di Kalimantan: potensi, manfaat, permasalahan dan kebijakan yang diperlukan untuk kelestariannya. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 6(3), 161?168.

Ervianto, W. I. (2023). Manajemen proyek konstruksi. Penerbit Andi.

Gillham, J. E., Carter, A. S., Volkmar, F. R., & Sparrow, S. S. (2000). Toward a developmental operational definition of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 269?278.

Junnila, S. I. (2006). Empirical comparison of process and economic input-output life cycle assessment in service industries. Environmental Science & Technology, 40(22), 7070?7076.

Kibert, C. J. (2016). Sustainable construction: green building design and delivery. John Wiley & Sons.

Land, B. (2009). Capturing a fair share of fiscal benefits in the extractive industry. Transnational Corporations, 18(1), 157.

McGowan, A. (2010). Managerial Accounting. Issues in Accounting Education, 25(4), 792.

Miles, M. B. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks.

M.Natsir, Triyono, A., M.Natsir, Wibowo, A., Mohamed, S., Bambang, A. W., AW, B., Rodruez-Flores, J., Herrera-Perez, V., Pacheco-Cunduri, M., Hernandez-Ambato, J., Paredes-Camacho, A., Delgado-Prieto, M., Widiana, I. N., Giriantari, I. A. D., Setiawan, I. N., McKee, S., Sneyd, A. D., Tom M. F., ? Mellion, M. J. (2010). Risk criticality and allocation in privatised water supply projects in Indonesia. International Journal of Project Management, 19(2), 3. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.08.003

Mueller, H. S., Haist, M., Moffatt, J. S., & Vogel, M. (2017). Design, material properties and structural performance of sustainable concrete. Procedia Engineering, 171, 22?32.

Pacheco-Torgal, F., & Labrincha, J. A. (2013). The future of construction materials research and the seventh UN Millennium Development Goal: A few insights. Construction and Building Materials, 40, 729?737.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: A personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative Social Work, 1(3), 261?283.

Plamonia, N. (2020). Improving The Coverage Area of Drinking Water Provision by Using Build Operate and Transfer Investments in Indonesia. An Institutional Analysis.

Plamonia, N., Agustin, A., & Andreas, A. (2023). Analisis Faktor Penentu Tingkat Akurasi Estimasi Biaya Proyek Menggunakan Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Arsitekta: Jurnal Arsitektur Dan Kota Berkelanjutan, 5 (01), 54?64.

Plamonia, N., Efendi, M. R., & Andreas, A. (2023). Perbandingan Efisiensi Energi Solar Water Heater (SWH) dan Electric Water Heater (EWH) Dalam Skala Rumah Tangga Menggunakan Life Cycle Cost (LCC). Jurnal ARTESIS, 3(1), 62?68.

Plamonia, N., & Merapi, E. B. (2022). Fungsi Pintu Air Manggarai sebagai Pengendali Banjir Jakarta Pusat. In A. Suwandi (Ed.), Smart and Sustainable Industry (2022nd ed., Vol. 2022). https://ft.univpancasila.ac.id/semrestek/2018/assets/images/SDGs79.png. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21992498

Pratama, A., & Plamonia, N. (2023). Analisis Pengaruh Faktor?Faktor Penentu Kontraktor Untuk Kemenangan Tender. Jurnal ARTESIS, 3 (2), 141?147.

Rahman, H. Z., Juniati, A. T., Miraj, P., Zuna, H. T., & Plamonia, N. (2024). Evaluating consumer insights in water services: perspectives on health benefits, pricing tolerance, and continuous service demand. Water Practice & Technology. https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2024.064

Suyitno, B. M. B. M., Anggrainy, R., Plamonia, N., & Rahman, R. A. R. A. (2023). Preliminary characterization and thermal evaluation of a direct contact cascaded immiscible inorganic salt/high-density polyethylene as moderate temperature heat storage material. Results in Materials, 19, 100443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinma.2023.100443

Umum, K. P. (2022). Pedoman Penyusunan Perkiraan Biaya Pekerjaan Konstruksi Bidang Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat. Kasus Proyek Penataan Koridor Jl. Ir. Juanda, Surakarta). Matriks Teknik Sipil, 10(2), 90.

Wardono, H., & Jepriani, S. (n.d.). Pohon Ulin Sebagai Konstruksi Stabilitas Lereng di Desa Pampang Samarinda Ulin Trees as Construction of Slope Stability in Desa Pampang Samarinda.

Wardono, H., & Jepriani, S. (2014). Pohon Ulin Sebagai Konstruksi Stabilitas lereng di Desa Pampang Samarinda. Jurnal Inersia, 6(2), 9?16.