Participatory Action For and Through Ecological Integrity: Toroidality as a Circular Design Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5614/j.vad.2025.17.1.2Keywords:
anthropocentrism, circular design, collective knowledge, design model, ecocentrism, ecological integrity, interobjectivity, participatory action researchAbstract
The ecological crisis corrupts natural cycles, damages networks of organisms, and disrupts the ecosystem equilibrium. In response to the ecological crisis, the concept of circularity proposes reformative actions. However, these actions are insufficient to reverse the crisis and achieve ecological integrity because they are non-holistic and based on human concerns and priorities. A more inclusive and integrative mindset is necessary for better-functioning circular processes. In this regard, this research presents a theoretical framework for an alternative circular design model ? Toroidality ? which is driven by collective knowledge and participatory action. Toroidality functions through the integrative capacity of collective knowledge and collaboration among human and non-human stakeholders in the ecosystem. Based on the intertwined cycles of collective knowledge and collective value-creation, Toroidality becomes a self-feeding circular design model. Through its four-phased circular design processes, Toroidality claims to generate solutions that have regenerative capacities. This article clarifies the conceptual background, theoretical framework and complementary notions to present the fundamentals of Toroidality. After this initial explanatory article, the dynamics of the phases and interactions among the stakeholders are aimed to be explored and reported in the following research, through a real-life case study.
References
Kopnina, H., Anthropocentrism: Problem of Human-Centered Ethics in Sustainable Development Goals, in: Leal Filho, W., Azul, A.M., Brandli, L., Lange Salvia, A., Wall, T. (eds) Life on Land. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, Springer, Cham, 2021.
?leszy?ski, J., Circular Economy in the Natural and Anthropocentric Approach, Economics and Environment, 67(4), 13. 2018.
Gray, J., Whyte, I. & Curry, P., Ecocentrism: What it Means and What it Implies, The Ecological Citizen, 1(2), pp. 130-131, 2018.
Morton, T., Dark Ecology: For a Logic of Future Coexistence, Columbia University Press, 2016.
Lewis, S.L. & Maslin, M.A., Defining the Anthropocene, Nature, 519, pp. 171?180, 2015.
Ross, D., Leonard, B. & Inayatullah, S., Leadership Beyond the Great Pause: Climate Change and Other Wicked Problems, Journal of Futures Studies, 26(4), pp. 15-22, 2022.
Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockstr, J., Cornell, S.E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E.M., Biggs, R., et al., Planetary Boundaries: Guiding Human Development on a Changing Planet, Science, 347(6223), pp. 736-748, 2015.
Haraway, D., Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene: Making Kin, Environmental Humanities, 6(1), pp. 159-165, 2015.
Hamilton, C., Bonneuil, C. & Gemenne, F., The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis: Rethinking modernity in a new epoch, Routledge, 2015.
Morton, T. Mal-functioning, The Yearbook of Comparative Literature, 58, pp. 95-114, 2012.
Plumwood, V., The Eye of the Crocodile, Edited by Lorraine Shannon, ANU Press, http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt24hcd2, (30 June 2023).
Morton, T., Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World, University of Minnesota Press, 2013.
Diamond, J., Agriculture: The Worst Mistake in the History of the Human Race, Discovery Magazine, 8(5), pp. 64?66, 1987.
UN General Assembly, Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, SDGS/UN, https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda, (30 June 2023).
Magee, L., Scerri, A., James, P., Thom, J.A., Padgham, L., Hickmott, S., Deng, H. & Cahill, F., Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 15(1), pp. 225-243, 2013.
Elkington, J., 25 Years Ago I Coined the Phrase ?Triple Bottom Line.?, Here?s Why It?s Time to Rethink It, Harvard Business Review, https://hbr.org/2018/06/25-years-ago-i-coined-the-phrase-triple-bottom-line-heres-why-im-giving-up-on-it, (30 June 2023).
McDonough, W. & Braungart, M., The Upcycle: Beyond Sustainability--Designing for Abundance, ed. 1, North Point Press, 2013.
McDonough, W. & Braungart, M., Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things, North Point Press, 2002.
Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Towards the Circular Economy, Vol. 2: Opportunities for the Consumer Goods Sector, Ellen MacArthur Foundation, https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/towards-the-circular-economy-vol-2-opportunities-for-the-consumer-goods, (30 June 2023).
Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Circular Economy Introduction, Ellen MacArthur Foundation, https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/topics/circular-economy-introduction/overview, (Accessed 30 June 2023).
Raworth, K., Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st Century Economist, Random House, 2017.
Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N.M.P. & Hultink, E.J., The Circular Economy: A New Sustainability Paradigm?, Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, pp. 757?768, 2017.
Geissdoerfer, M., Morioka, S.N., de Carvalho, M.M. & Evans, S., Business Models and Supply Chains for the Circular Economy, Journal of Cleaner Production, 190, pp. 712?721, 2018.
Sundararajan, A., The Sharing Economy: The End of Employment and the Rise of Crowd-Based Capitalism, MIT Press, 2016.
Botsman, R. & Rogers, R., What?s Mine Is Yours: The Rise of Collaborative Consumption, Harper Collins, 2010.
Benkler, Y., The Penguin and the Leviathan: How Cooperation Triumphs over Self-Interest, Crown Publishing Group, 2011.
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C. & Ulgiati, S., A Review on Circular Economy: The Expected Transition to a Balanced Interplay of Environmental and Economic Systems, Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, pp. 11?32, 2016.
Holmes, H., Wieser, H. & Kasmire, J., Critical Approaches to Circular Economy Research: Time, Space and Evolution, Sustainable Consumption and Production Vol II: Circular Economy and Beyond, Swain, R.B. & Sweet, S., Springer International Publishing, pp. 55?74, 2021.
Cullen, J.M., Circular economy: Theoretical Benchmark or Perpetual Motion Machine?, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), pp. 483?486, 2017.
Greer, R., von Wirth, T. & Loorbach, D., The Waste-resource Paradox: Practical Dilemmas and Societal Implications in the Transition to a Circular Economy, Journal of Cleaner Production, 303, 126831, 2021.
Pires, A., Martinho, G., Rodrigues, S. & Gomes, M.I., Sustainable Solid Waste Collection and Management, Springer, 2018.
Fellner, J., Lederer, J., Scharff, C. & Laner, D., Present Potentials and Limitations of a Circular Economy with Respect to Primary Raw Material Demand, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21, pp. 494-496, 2017.
Savini, F., The Economy that Runs on Waste: Accumulation in the Circular City, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(6), pp. 675?691, 2019.
Korhonen, J., Honkasalo, A. & Sepp J., Circular Economy: The Concept and its Limitations, Ecological Economics, 143, pp. 37?46, 2018.
Lazarevic, D. & Valve, H., Narrating Expectations for the Circular Economy: Towards a Common and Contested European Transition, Energy Research & Social Science, 31, pp. 60?69, 2017.
Corvellec, H., Stowell, A.F. & Johansson, N., Critiques of the Circular Economy, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 26, pp. 421? 432, 2022.
Zwiers, J., Jaeger-Erben, M. & Hofmann, F., Circular Literacy: A Knowledge-based Approach to the Circular Economy, Culture and Organization, 26(2), pp. 121-141, 2020.
Washington, H., Taylor, B., Kopnina, H., Cryer, P. & Piccolo, J.J., Why Ecocentrism is the Key Pathway to Sustainability, The Ecological Citizen, 1(1), pp. 35?41, 2017.
Latour, B., On Interobjectivity, Mind, Culture and Activity, 3, pp. 228-245, 1996.
Moghaddam, F. M., Interobjectivity and Culture, Culture & Psychology, 9(3), pp. 221?232, 2003.
Harman, G., Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything, Pelican Random House, 2017.
Mazzocchi, F., A Deeper Meaning of Sustainability: Insights from Indigenous Knowledge, The Anthropocene Review, 7(1), pp. 77-93, 2020.
Veselova, E. & Gaziulusoy, ?., Bioinclusive Collaborative and Participatory Design: A Conceptual Framework and a Research Agenda, Design and Culture, 14(2), pp. 149-183, 2022.
Garc-Lez, G. A., Lang, U., & Singh, N., Commons, Commoning and Co-Becoming: Nurturing Life-in-common and Post-capitalist Futures (An Introduction to the Theme Issue), Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 4(4), pp. 1199-1216, 2021.
Adams, R., Mann, L., Jordan, S.S. & Daly, S., Exploring the Boundaries: Language, Roles, and Structures in Cross-disciplinary Design Teams, in the book About Designing: Analysing Design Meetings, ed. 1, McDonnell, J., & Lloyd, P., eds., CRC Press, 2009.
Bassetti, C., Sciannamblo, M., Lyle, P., Teli, M., De Paoli, S. & De Angeli, A., Co-designing for Common Values: Creating Hybrid Spaces to Nurture Autonomous Cooperation, CoDesign, 15(3), pp. 256-271, 2019.
Gl?veanu, V.P., Wonder: The Extraordinary Power of an Ordinary Experience, Bloomsbury, 2020.
Katoppo, M.L. & Sudradjat, I., Combining Participatory Action Research (PAR) and Design Thinking (DT) as an Alternative Research Method in Architecture, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 184, pp. 118-125, 2015.
Chevalier, J.M. & Buckles, D.J., Participatory Action Research: Theory and Methods for Engaged Inquiry, ed. 2, Routledge, 2019.
Borda, O.F., Participatory (Action) Research in Social Theory: Origins and Challenges, Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, Reason, P. & Bradbury, H., eds., SAGE, 27-37, 2001.
O'Leary, Z., The Essential Guide to Doing your Research Project, ed. 3, Sage Publications, 2017.
Tjahja, C. & Yee, J., Being a Sociable Designer: Reimagining the Role of Designers in Social Innovation, CoDesign, 18(1), pp. 135-150, 2022.
Smitheram, M. & Joseph, F., Material Aesthetic Collaborations: Making-with the Ecosystem, CoDesign, 16(4), pp. 293-310, 2020.
Brown, T. & Ka?tz, B., Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation, ed. 1, Harper Business, 2009.
van Boeijen, A., Daalhuizen, J., van der Schoor, R. & Zijlstra, J., Delft Design Guide: Design Strategies and Methods, BIS Publishers, 2014.
Ibinarriaga, D.H. & Martin, B., Critical Co-Design and Agency of the Real, Design and Culture 13(3), pp. 253-276, 2021.
Zamenopoulos, T. & Alexiou, K., Co-design as Collaborative Research Connected Communities Foundation Series, Bristol University AHRC Connected Communities Programme, 2018.
Blomsma, F., Pigosso, D.C. & McAloone, T.C., A Theoretical Foundation for Developing a Prescriptive Method for the Co-Design of Circular Economy Value Chains, Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED19), 2019.
Elsasser, W.M., Induction Effects in Terrestrial Magnetism Part I. Theory, Physical Review, 69(3-4), pp. 106-116, 1946.
Hall, M., Clegg, S.R. & Sillince, J.A., The Importance of Learning to Differentiate between 'Hard' and 'Soft' Knowledge, Proceedings of the 10th International Business Information Management Association Conference, pp. 1224-1231, 2008.
Clarke, A.J., Actions Speak Louder, Design and Culture, 5(2), pp. 151-168, 2013.
Kimmerer, R.W., Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge and the Teachings of Plants, Minneapolis, Milkweed Editions, 2013.
Balsiger, P.W., Supradisciplinary Research Practices: History, Objectives and Rationale, Futures, 36, pp. 407-421, 2004.
Falcon, J., Designing Consciousness: Psychedelics as Ontological Design Tools for Decolonizing Consciousness, Design and Culture, 13(2), pp. 143-163, 2021.
Maffesoli, M., Ecosophy: An Ecology for Our Time, Les e?ditions du Cerf, 2017. (Text in French)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Visual Art and Design

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.