Strategi pengambilan keputusan untuk pengembangan pertahanan nasional menggunakan multi criteria decision making: pembelajaran dari Departemen Pertahanan Amerika Serikat
Keywords:
pengambilan keputusan, pertahanan, pakar, militer, MCDMAbstract
Tugas pertahanan nasional sesungguhnya adalah tugas seluruh warga negara, bukan hanya bagi aparatur negara saja khususnya angkatan bersenjata, tetapi juga masyarakat sipil lainnya. Pemerintah Indonesia sebagaimana juga pemerintah lainnya di seluruh dunia menyediakan suatu kementerian yang menangani pertahanan. Melalui Kementerian Pertahanan inilah sejumlah kebijakan yang merupakan keputusan strategis diambil dengan melibatkan banyak pihak, terutama para pakar yang menguasai bidangnya masing-masing. Salah satu metode yang sering digunakan dalam pengambilan keputusan, termasuk di negara-negara maju seperti Amerika Serikat adalah Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM). Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mempelajari strategi pengambilan keputusan bagi pengembangan pertahanan nasional menggunakan MCDM sebagai sebuah pembelajaran dari Departeman Pertahanan di Amerika Serikat. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa Kementerian Pertahanan Republik Indonesia sebagai kementerian yang secara spesifik mengelola sejumlah agenda kebijakan pertahanan, memerlukan penerapan MCDM dalam pengambilan keputusan-keputusan strategis. Melalui beragam metode yang telah berkembang saat ini diharapkan dapat digunakan dalam membantu, memudahkan, mempercepat, memperjelas, dan mempersingkat pengambilan keputusan tersebut. Pembelajaran dari Departemen Pertahanan Amerika Serikat (Dephan-AS) dalam merumuskan berbagai analisa alternatif bagi implementasi program pengembangan pertahanan, baik militer maupun nirmiliter menjadi pelajaran berharga untuk dapat menjadi model bagi kebijakan pengembangan pertahanan di Indonesia.References
Afshari, A., Mojahed, M., Yusuff, R.M. (2010). Simple Additive Weighting Approach to Personnel Selection Problem. International Journal of Innovation Management and Technology 1 (5): 511-514.
Aminbakhsh, S., Gunduz, M., Sonmez, R. (2013). Safety risk assessment using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) during planning and budgeting of construction projects. Journal of Safety Research 46: 99-105.
Andraszewicz, S., Scheibehenne, B., Rieskamp, J., Grasman, R., Verhagen, J., Wagenmakers, E-J. (2015). An Introduction to bayesian hypothesis testing for management research. Journal of Management 41 (2): 521-543.
Aragones-Beltran, P., Chaparro-Gonzalezb, F., Pastor-Ferrandoc, J-P., Pla-Rubioc, A. (2014). An AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process)/ANP (Analytic Network Process)-based multi-criteria decision approach for the selection of solar-thermal power plant investment projects. Energy 66 (1): 222-238.
Baumgartner, J. (2010). The Way of the Innovation Master. JPB, Bwiti bvba. Erps-Kwerps, Belgium.
Chen, C.I., dan Stettner, R. (2011). Drogue Tracking Using 3D Flash LIDAR for Autonomous Aerial Refueling, Retrieved November 23, 2017, from http://www.advancedscien-tificconcepts.com/technology/documents/DrogueTrackingUsing3DFlashLIDARforAutonomousAerialRefueling.pdf
Chen, Z. (2005). Consensus in Group Decision Making Under Linguistic Assessments. Dissertation, Kansas State University, Manhattan Kansas
Claudio, D., Kremer, G.E.O., Bravo-Llerena, W., Freivalds, A. (2014). A dynamic multi-attribute utility theory-based decision support system for patient prioritization in the emergency department. IIE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering 4 (1): 1-15.
Dephan-AS [Departemen Pertahanan Amerika Serikat]. (2008). Department of Defense Instruction, Operation of the Defense Acquisition System, USD (AT&L), DoDI 5000.02, U.S. Department of Defense, Washington DC.
Djatna, T. (2016). Analisis dan Desain Sistem Produksi Agroindustri. Program Pasca Sarjana, Teknologi Industri Pertanian, Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Eriyatno. (2012). Ilmu Sistem: Meningkatkan Mutu dan Efektifitas Manajemen. Surabaya Penrbit Guna Widya.
Fadhil, R., Djatna, T., Maarif, M.S. (2017a). Analysis and Design of a Human Resources Performance Measurement System for the Nutmeg Oil Agro-industry in Aceh. Journal Regional and City Planning 28 (2): 99-110.
Fadhil R, Maarif MS, Bantacut T, Hermawan A. 2017b. Perbandingan Teknik Pengambilan Keputusan Multi-Kriteria antara Metode Eckenrode dengan Metode Fuzzy-Eckenrode pada Kinerja Agroindustri. Jurnal Manajemen & Agribisnis 14 (2): 109-117.
Fadhil, R., Maarif, M.S., Bantacut, T., Hermawan, A. (2017c). Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Multi Kriteria Untuk Pengembangan Agroindustri Kopi Gayo Menggunakan Pendekatan Fuzzy-Eckenrode dan Fuzzy-Topsis. Jurnal Teknologi Industri Pertanian 27 (1): 103-113.
Georgiadis, D.R. (2013). Using Multi Criteria Decision Making in Analysis of Alternatives for Selection of Enabling Technology. [Dissertation]. Faculty of the School of Engineering and Applied Science of the George Washington University.
Georgiadis, D.R., Mazzuchi, T.A., Sarkani, S. (2012). Using multi criteria decision making in analysis of alternatives for selection of enabling technology. Systems Engineering 16 (3): 287-303.
Global Firepower. (2017). 2017 Military Strength Ranking: The complete Global Firepower list for 2017 puts the military powers of the world into full perspective. https://www. globalfirepower.com/countries-listing.asp. Retrieved November 15, 2017.
Hopfe, C.J. (2009). Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis in Building Performance Simulation for Decision Support and Design Optimization, Issue 133, from http://alexandria.tue.nl/ extra2/200911580.pdf.
Hwang, C.L., dan Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications, Verlag, Berlin, Springer.
Jain, V., dan Raj, T. (2013). Evaluation of flexibility in FMS using SAW and WPM. Decision Science Letters 2 (4): 223-230.
Kahraman, C. (2008). Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods and Fuzzy Sets. Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making, Theory and applications with recent Development. Springer.
Kalibatas, D., dan Turskis, K. (2008). Multi criteria evaluation of inner climate by using MOORA method. Inform Technol Control 37 (1): 79-83.
Kao, C. (2010). Weight determination for consistently ranking alternatives in multiple criteria decision analysis. Applied Mathematical Modelling 34 (7): 1779-1787.
Kemenhan RI. (2015). Buku Putih Pertahanan Indonesia 2015. Kementerian Pertahanan Republik Indonesia, Jakarta.
Kilic, H.S., Zaim, S., Delen, D. (2015). Selecting "The Best" ERP system for SMEs using a combination of ANP and PROMETHEE methods. Expert Systems with Applications 42 (5): 2343-2352.
Lofti, F.H., Fallahnejad, R., Navidi, N. (2011). Ranking efficient units in DEA by using TOPSIS method. Appl Math Sci 5 (17): 805-815.
Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., Nor, K.M.D., Khalifah, Z., Zakwan, N., Valipour, A. (2015). Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their application - a review of the literature from 2000-2014. Economic Research-Ekonomska IstraA3/4ivanja 28 (1): 516-571.
Mardani, A., Zavadskas, E.K., Govindan, K., Senin, A.A., Jusoh, A. (2016). VIKOR technique: a systematic review of the state of the art literature on methodologies and applications. Sustainability 8 (1): 1-38
Marimin. (2017). SistemPendukung Pengambilan Keputusan dan Sistem Pakar. Bogor: Penerbit IPB Press.
Mendoza, G.A., Macoun, P., Prabhu, R., Sukadri, D., Purnomo, H., Hartanto, H. (1999). Guidelines for Applying Multi-Criteria Analysis to the Assessment of Criteria and Indicators. Jakarta: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).
Miles, L.D. (2015). Techniques of Value Analysis and Engineering. 3rd Edition. Portland: Lawrence D. Miles Value Foundation.
Moore, N. (2015). Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC). Systems Development Life Cycle Cheat Sheet. https://www. cheatography.com/ nataliemoore/cheat-sheets/systems-development-life-cycle/
Poduval, P.S., Pramod, V.R., Jagathy-Raj, V.P. (2015). Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and its application in analyzing factors inhibiting implementation of Total Productive Maintenance (TPM). International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 32 (3): 308-331.
Putra, A.A., Andreswari, D., Susilo, B. (2015). Sistem pendukung keputusan untuk penerima bantuan pinjaman samisake dengan metode electre (studi kasus: LKM Kelurahan Lingkar Timur Kota Bengkulu). Jurnal Rekursif 3 (1): 1-11.
Saaty, T.L. (2013). The modern science of multicriteria decision making and its practical applications: The AHP/ANP approach. Operations Research 61 (5): 1101-1118.
Salehi, A., dan Izadikhah, M. (2014). A novel method to extend SAW for decision-making problems with interval data. Decision Science Letters 3 (2): 225-236.
Scarlat, C., Alexe, C., Carlat, E.I. (2011). Assessing The Firm's Innovation Potential: A Romanian Case Study. Management and Production Engineering Review 2 (4): 57-65.
Scarlat, C. (2000). Metoda distanAei tehnice (Technical Distance Method). Chapter 19, in Sisteme, metode AYi tehnici manageriale ale organizaAiei (Systems, methods, and techniques for organization management, Coord.: O. Nicolescu, 369-378. BucureAYti: Editura EconomicAf.
Scarlat, C. (2005). The DISTEH Multicriteria Decision Making Model. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Operations & Quantitative Management (ICOQM-6): "Intelligent Decision Making: Emerging Strategy for Global Winners" , August 9-11, 2005. Indore: Indian Institute of Management.
Schmid, K., Waters, K., Dingerson, L., Hadley, B., Mataosky, R., Carter, J., Dare, J. (2008). LIDAR 101: An Introduction to LIDAR Technology, Data, and Applications, Charleston, SC: NOAA Coastal Services Center.
Statista. (2015). America's Biggest Defense Contractors. The Statistics Portal. https://www.statista.com/chart/4929/americas-biggest-defense-contractors/.
Stettner, R., Bailey, H., Silverman, S. (2006). Large Format Time-of-Flight Focal Plane Detector Development, Advanced Scientific Concepts, Inc.(ASC), Retrieved November 22, 2012, from http://www.advancedscientificconcepts.com/technology/documents/Eye-safe-paper05-1.pdf
Tamiz, M., Jones, D., Romero, C. (1998). Goal Programming for Decision Making: An Overview of the Current State-of-the-Art. European Journal of Operational Research 111: 569-581.
Tanadtang, P., dan Park, D. (2003). Applying Evidential Reasoning for Evaluating Transportation Demand Management Schemes: A Case Study of Bangkok. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies 5: 1781-1801.
Tseng, G.H., dan Huang, J.J. (2011). Multiple Attribute Decision Making, Methods and Applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Turban, E., dan Aronson, J.E. (2001). Decision support system and intelligent systems, 6th ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Turskis, Z., dan Zavadskas, E.K. (2010). A Novel Method for Multiple Criteria Analysis: Grey Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS-G) Method. INFORMATICA 21 (4): 597-610.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2009). Many analyses of alternatives have not provided a robust assessment of weapon system options. Publication GAO-09-665, GAO, Washington DC.
Wang, R.T. (2011). performance evaluation method - technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). Retrieved November 17, 2015. http://researcher.nsc.gov. tw/public/caroljoe/Data/02182133671.ppt
Wasson, C.S. (2015). System Analysis, Design, and Development: Concepts, Principles, and Practices. John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.
Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., KildienA-, S. (2014). State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods. Technological and Economic Development of Economy 20 (1): 165-179.
