Argument-Mapping Using ChatGPT to Enhance the Quality of Scientific Arguments for Students
Keywords:
Argument Mapping, ChatGPT, argument writingAbstract
This study explores the impact of Argument Mapping (AM) assisted by ChatGPT on students' ability to write scientific arguments. While AM has been shown to enhance argumentative skills, there is limited research on integrating generative technologies like ChatGPT into the AM model for writing instruction. This study examines ChatGPT's role in helping students in the Nursing and Primary School Teacher Education (PGSD) programs develop clearer and more logical argument structures. A mixed-methods explanatory sequential design was used, incorporating quantitative pre- and post-tests to measure improvements in argumentative writing and qualitative semi-structured interviews to gather students' perceptions. Results show that AM supported by ChatGPT significantly enhances students' argumentative writing skills, particularly in clarity and argument structure in depth. The findings suggest that ChatGPT aids writing and fosters critical thinking. However, ethical considerations, including plagiarism awareness, are important when using this technology. This study contributes to the literature by highlighting AI's potential to improve argumentative writing skills and promoting the integration of technology in education for developing critical thinking.
References
Achour, K., Laanoui, M. D., & Ourahay, M. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT in-education A comprehensive overview. 2024 International Conference on Global Aeronautical Engineering and Satellite Technology (GAST), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/GAST60528.2024.10520810
Al Yakin, A., Muthmainnah, M., Apriani, E., Obaid, A. J., & Elngar, A. A. (2023). Transforming Online Learning Management: Generative Models on ChatGPT to Enhance Online Student Engagement Scale (OLE). Idarah (Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kependidikan), 7(2). https://doi.org/10.47766/idarah.v7i2.1514
Arum, R., Calderon Leon, M., Li, X. F., & Lopes, J. (2025). ChatGPT Early Adoption in Higher Education: Variation in Student Usage, Instructional Support, and Educational Equity. AERA Open, 11. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584251331956
Ayon, N. S. (2017). Students’ and Instructors’ Perceptions of Turnitin: A Plagiarism Deterrent? Creative Education, 08(13). https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2017.813141
Bassham, G., Irwin, W., Nardone, H., & Wallace, J. M. (2011). Critical Thinking: A Student’s Introduction (Fourth Edition). McGraw-Hill.
Bilge, B. A., Filiz, M., Bilge, B. A., & Filiz, M. (2017). Evaluation of teacher candidates writing skills. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(24). https://doi.org/10.5897/err2017.3430
Çela, E., Vajjhala, N. R., & Fonkam, M. M. (2024). Teachers’ roles and perspectives on AI integration in schools. In Teachers’ Roles and Perspectives on AI Integration in Schools. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-1017-6
Chaudhary, N., Jain, P., & Sharma, C. (2024). From Traditional to Technological (pp. 79–108). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-1692-5.ch004
Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. In Research design.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. (2011). Disciplining the Practice of Qualitative Research. In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research.
Ennis, R. H. (2015). Critical Thinking: A Streamlined Conception. In The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-37805-7_2
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill.
Giri, V., & Paily, M. U. (2020). Effect of Scientific Argumentation on the Development of Critical Thinking. Science and Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00120-y
Hidri, S. (2018). Assessing spoken language ability: A many-facet Rasch analysis. In Second Language Learning and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62884-4_2
Hutasuhut, M. L. (2023). Engaged at the first sight! Anticipating your audience as a way to think critically in writing an argument. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(3), 680–693. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i3.55170
Jumadi, J. (2021). The impact of problem-based learning with argument mapping and online laboratory on scientific argumentation skill. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(1), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i1.20593
Kleemola, K. (2023). Variation in novice students’ critical thinking and argumentation: Transition to higher education is not a level playing field. Kasvatustieteellisiä Tutkimuksia.
Kuhn, D. (1992). Thinking as Argument. Harvard Educational Review. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.62.2.9r424r0113t670l1
Kyrousi, A. G., Tzoumaka, E., & Leivadi, S. (2022). Business employability for late millennials: exploring the perceptions of generation Z students and generation X faculty. Management Research Review, 45(5). https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-04-2021-0328
Lawrence, A. M. (2021). How Feedback From an Online Video Game Teaches Argument Writing for Environmental Action. Journal of Literacy Research, 53(1), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X20986598
Liu, F., & Stapleton, P. (2014). Counterargumentation and the cultivation of critical thinking in argumentative writing: Investigating washback from a high-stakes test. System. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.05.005
Liu, F., & Stapleton, P. (2020). Counterargumentation at the primary level: An intervention study investigating the argumentative writing of second language learners. System. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102198
Lund, B. D., Wang, T., Mannuru, N. R., Nie, B., Shimray, S., & Wang, Z. (2023). ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence-written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 74(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24750
Miles, M. A. (1994). Miles and Huberman (1994)- Chapter 4.pdf. In Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook.
Muthmainnah, M., Apriani, E., Seraj, P. M. I., Obaid, A. J., & Al Yakin, A. M. (2023). Nudging motivation to learn English through a ChatGPT smartphone-based hybrid model. In Advanced Applications of Generative AI and Natural Language Processing Models. https://doi.org/10.4018/9798369305027.ch002
Nakrowi, Z. S., Ansori, D. S., Mulyati, Y., & Setyaningsih, Y. (2023). The use of intellectual standards to assess the quality of students’ argumentative writings. LITERA, 22(2), 200–212. https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v22i2.60465
Nakrowi, Z. S., Dadang S. Ansori, Yeti Mulyati, & Yuliana Setyaningsih. (2024). Kemampuan Menulis Argumentasi Siswa: Analisis Profil dan Problematika Pembelajaran. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, Dan Sastra, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v10i1.3107
Nakrowi, Z. S., & Mulyati, Y. (2021). Evaluasi Kualitas Argumen pada Artikel Jurnal. LITERA. https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v20i1.34287
Neumann, M., Rauschenberger, M., & Schon, E. M. (2023). ‘We Need To Talk About ChatGPT’: The Future of AI and Higher Education. Proceedings - 2023 IEEE/ACM 5th International Workshop on Software Engineering Education for the Next Generation, SEENG 2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/SEENG59157.2023.00010
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2020). The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools (Vol. 33).
Paul, R., & Elder, L. & F. for C. T. (2012). The miniature guide to critical thinking: Concepts and tools. 27th International Conference on Critical Thinking.
Pessoa, S., Mitchell, T. D., & Miller, R. T. (2018). Scaffolding the argument genre in a multilingual university history classroom: Tracking the writing development of novice and experienced writers. English for Specific Purposes, 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.12.002
Qin, J., & Karabacak, E. (2010). The analysis of Toulmin elements in Chinese EFL university argumentative writing. System. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2010.06.012
Rasul, T., Nair, S., Kalendra, D., Robin, M., Santini, F. de O., Ladeira, W. J., Sun, M., Day, I., Rather, R. A., & Heathcote, L. (2023). The role of ChatGPT in higher education: Benefits, challenges, and future research directions. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.29
Raza, M. R., & Hussain, W. (2023). Preserving Academic Integrity in Teaching with ChatGPT: Practical Strategies. 2023 IEEE/WIC International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT), 158–162. https://doi.org/10.1109/WI-IAT59888.2023.00027
Read, S. (2010). A Model for Scaffolding Writing Instruction: IMSCI. The Reading Teacher. https://doi.org/10.1598/rt.64.1.5
Rousseau, D. L. (2024). Teaching Critical Thinking With Argument Mapping. Journal of Political Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2024.2388821
Sallam, M. (2023). The Utility of ChatGPT as an Example of Large Language Models in Healthcare Education, Research and Practice: Systematic Review on the Future Perspectives and Potential Limitations. MedRxiv.
Sbarski, P., Van Gelder, T., Marriott, K., Prager, D., & Bulka, A. (2008). Visualizing argument structure. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 5358 LNCS(PART 1). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89639-5_13
Setyaningsih, Y. (2016). Pola Argumen Paragraf Argumentatif pada Artikel Jurnal Terakreditasi Bidang Ekonomi (Perspektif Stephen Toulmin). Adabiyyāt: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajbs.2016.15202
Skryd, A., & Lawrence, K. (2023). ChatGPT as a Tool for Medical Education and Clinical Decision-Making on the Wards: Case Study (Preprint). JMIR Formative Research. https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.51346
Taufikin, M. S. I., Supa’At, Azifah, N., Nikmah, F., Kuanr, J., & Parminder. (2024). The Impact of AI on Teacher Roles and Pedagogy in the 21st Century Classroom. 2024 International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Communication Systems (ICKECS), 1, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICKECS61492.2024.10617236
Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument: Updated edition. In The Uses of Argument: Updated Edition. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840005
Toulmin, S. E. (2012). The Layout of Arguments. In The Uses of Argument. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511840005.007
Wang, C. (2024). Exploring Students’ Generative AI-Assisted Writing Processes: Perceptions and Experiences From Native and Nonnative English Speakers. Technology Knowledge and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09744-3
Widyastuti, S. (2018). Fostering critical thinking skills through argumentative writing. Cakrawala Pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v37i2.20157
Yan, L., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Jin, Y., Echeverria, V., Milesi, M., Fan, J., Zhao, L., Alfredo, R., Li, X., & Gašević, D. (2025). The effects of generative AI agents and scaffolding on enhancing students’ comprehension of visual learning analytics. Computers & Education, 234, 105322. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105322
Yilmaz-Na, E. (2023a). Having qualified arguments: Promoting Pre-service teachers’ critical thinking through deliberate computer-assisted argument mapping practices. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101216
Yilmaz-Na, E. (2023b). Unfolding the potential of computer-assisted argument mapping practices for promoting self-regulation of learning and problem-solving skills of pre-service teachers and their relationship. Computers and Education, 193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104683
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Zain Syaifudin Nakrowi, Haris Santosa Nugraha, Nafri Yanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
