Socio-Technological Business Intelligence Dashboard for Academic Quality Assurance Using Design Thinking and Kimball Approach
Keywords:
business intelligence, Sentiment analysis, four-step Kimball, power BI, academic quality assuranceAbstract
Academic quality assurance (QA) in higher education institutions (HEIs) typically relies on conducting student surveys every semester to evaluate lecturer performance. However, the data processing in the case study remains manual in Microsoft Excel. Data processing results in 3 to 4 days of reporting delay per cycle. There are issues with data inconsistency, duplication, and non-automated mapping of questions into variables. This study aims to develop a business intelligence (BI) dashboard using Power BI that supports data-driven academic QA. The system was developed using human-centered design thinking and the four-step Kimball data warehousing methodology. The resulting dashboard comprises six main pages incorporating Pythonbased sentiment analysis. This dashboard includes interactive filtering and automated mapping of question variables. Evaluation through task-based usability testing yielded a 100% task completion rate, an average Single Ease Question score of 6.08 out of 7, and 100% data validity within a ±0.01 tolerance. In addition, all 43 visuals load in under 500 milliseconds. Theoretically, this study contributes a validated socio-technical BI framework demonstrating that user-participatory development has implications for organizational culture and decision-making in vocational HEIs. Practically, this dashboard eliminates manual reporting bottlenecks and enables stakeholders to monitor lecturer performance and generate reports more efficiently.
References
Alkhwaldi, A. F., Abdulmuhsin, A. A., Masa'deh, R., & Abu-AlSondos, I. A. (2025). Business intelligence adoption in higher education: The role of data-driven decision-making culture and UTAUT. Journal of International Education in Business, 18(4), 484-504. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIEB-08-2024-0110
Azzahra, S. W., Setiawan, N. Y., & Purnomo, W. (2025). Pengembangan dashboard business intelligence dengan integrasi metode kimball lifecycle dan design thinking untuk memantau performa karyawan di PT Jalin Mayantara Indonesia. Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer, 9(2). http://j-ptiik.ub.ac.id
Bednar, P. M., & Welch, C. (2020). Socio-technical perspectives on smart working: Creating meaningful and sustainable systems. Information Systems Frontiers, 22(2), 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09921-1
Haddadian, M. A., Abd Rahman, K. A., Perumal, V., & Ismail, S. (2019). Understanding empathy in the design thinking process. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 9(2), 1631-1635. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.B7412.129219
Hjelle, S., Mikalef, P., Altwaijry, N., & Parida, V. (2024). Organizational decision making and analytics: An experimental study on dashboard visualizations. Information and Management, 61(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2024.104011
Kastrati, Z., Dalipi, F., Imran, A. S., Pireva Nuci, K., & Wani, M. A. (2021). Sentiment analysis of students’ feedback with nlp and deep learning: A systematic mapping study. Applied Sciences, 11(9), 3986. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11093986
Kimball, R., & Ross, M. (2013). The data warehouse toolkit: the complete guide to dimensional modeling.
Mulyani, D. P., Wibowo, A., Dini, D., & Qudsi, H. (2018). Pengembangan sistem business intelligence untuk analisa pola tindak pidana di Pengadilan Negeri Pekanbaru. In Jurnal Komputer Terapan (Vol. 4, Issue 2). https://jurnal.pcr.ac.id
Murtiastuti, N. D., Liquiddanu, E., & Priyandari, Y. (2023). Perancangan dashboard performansi di bidang kemahasiswaan dan lulusan. Performa: Media Ilmiah Teknik Industri, 22(2), 151. https://doi.org/10.20961/performa.22.2.80764
Najwa, N. Fadilah, Zulvi, M. Sari, & Lulu, Y. D. (2023). Sistem dashboard segmentasi pasar menggunakan metode customer portfolio management. Jurnal Sosioteknologi, 22(3), 374-386. https://doi.org/10.5614/sostek.itbj.2023.22.3.9
Nashihuddin, W. (2012, May 11). Servqual: Metode tepat meningkatkan kualitas layanan perpustakaan- website UPT Perpustakaan dan Percetakan. https://digilib.undip.ac.id/2012/05/11/servqualmetode-tepat-meningkatkan-kualitas-layanan-perpustakaan/
Nurmalasari, D., & Nurzikriah. (2021). Implementasi business intelligence dashboard pada data pasien Puskesmas Kecamatan Rokan. In Jurnal Komputer Terapan (Vol. 7, Issue 2). https://jurnal.pcr.ac.id/index.php/jkt/
Regita, N. (2024, August 26). Apa itu kuisioner EDOM | Implementasi EDOM di dalam SIAKAD 4.0. https://suteki.co.id/apa-itu-kuisioner-edom/
Spooren, P., Brockx, B., & Mortelmans, D. (2013). On the validity of student evaluation of teaching. Review of Educational Research, 83(4), 598-642. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313496870
Stankovska, G., Ziberi, F., & Dimitrovski, D. (2024). Service quality and student satisfaction in higher education.
Vercellis, C. (2009). Business intelligence. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753866
Zulaikha, E., Andansari, D., & Susandari, H. (2023). Empathy-driven innovation. Asian HCI Symposium’23, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3604571.3604572
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2026 Nanda Habibie Erwin, Nina Fadilah Najwa, Istianah Muslim, Muhammad Mahrus Zain, Indah Lestari, Heni Rachmawati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




