The Role of Lexical and Semantic Features in Shaping Indonesian Academic Text Readability: An NLP-Based Analysis
Keywords:
text readability, lexical features, semantic features, natural language processing,, Indonesian academic writingAbstract
This study investigates the relationships among lexical features, semantic features, and readability using a corpus of 27,274 sentences extracted from Indonesian undergraduate academic abstracts. A quantitative descriptive-correlational design was employed, combining natural language processing (NLP)-based feature extraction with a regression-calibrated Indonesian adaptation of the Flesch readability formula. Pearson and Spearman correlation analyses were performed to examine associations among lexical density, lexical diversity, lexical bundles, semantic dimensions, and readability scores. The results show that semantic features consistently exhibit stronger relationships with readability than conventional lexical measures. Mean word concreteness exhibited the strongest positive correlation with readability (r = 0.424), whereas the abstractword ratio showed the strongest negative correlation (r = -0.407). In contrast, lexical density, lexical diversity, and lexical bundles displayed only negligible to weak correlations. These findings indicate that semantic clarity has a greater impact on the readability of Indonesian academic writing than lexical sophistication alone. Rather than emphasizing increasingly complex vocabulary, improving readability depends on communicating ideas through concrete and contextually meaningful language. Beyond extending Indonesian readability research, this study provides empirical evidence for the development of NLP-based readability assessment, intelligent academic writing assistance systems, and pedagogical practices that support clearer scholarly communication for national and international audiences.
References
Adelman, J. S., Brown, G. D. A., & Quesada, J. F. (2006). Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times. Psychological Science, 17(9), 814–823. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01787.x
Amini, H., Casamassimo, P. S., Lin, H. L., & Hayes, J. R. (2007). Readability of the American academy of pediatric dentistry patient education materials. Pediatric Dentistry, 29(5), 431–435. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-47149096211&partnerID=40&md5=39577e876da7fa1830adb908b623c393.
Anjaniputra, A. G., Hapsari, C. T., & Anam, Z. (2022). A contrastive analysis of Halliday’s theme system in Indonesian and English-native abstracts. E3S Web of Conferences, 359. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202235903001.
Ante, L. (2022). The relationship between readability and scientific impact: Evidence from emerging technology discourses. Journal of Informetrics, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2022.101252.
Az-Zahra, F., & Romadhony, A. (2023). Text readability analysis for Indonesian school textbook. 2023 International Conference on Data Science and Its Applications, ICoDSA 2023, 30-35. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICoDSA58501.2023.10277302.
Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D. L., Simpson, G. B., & Treiman, R. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 445-459. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193014.
Bao, T., Zhao, Y., Mao, J., & Zhang, C. (2025). Examining linguistic shifts in academic writing before and after the launch of ChatGPT: A study on preprint papers. Scientometrics, 130(7), 3597-3627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-025-05341-y.
Barber, H. A., Otten, L. J., Kousta, S.-T., & Vigliocco, G. (2013). Concreteness in word processing: ERP and behavioral effects in a lexical decision task. Brain and Language, 125(1), 47-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2013.01.005.
Bashori, M. (2021). The development of intra-individual variability in academic writing: A study on lexical diversity and lexical sophistication. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(2), 745-758. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i2.16843
Budiwiyanto, A., & Suhardijanto, T. (2020). Indonesian lexical bundles in research articles: Frequency, structure, and function. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 292–303. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v10i2.28592
Damaianti, V. S., Abidin, Y., & Rahma, R. (2020). Higher order thinking skills-based reading literacy assessment instrument: An Indonesian context. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 513–525. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v10i2.28600
Durante, P. G. C. (2025). Enhancing L2 writing pedagogy through AntWordProfiler and Flesch reading score analyses of vocabulary and readability. Arab World English Journal, 16(3), 359–372. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol16no3.22
Garcia-Varela, F., Bekerman, Z., Nussbaum, M., Mendoza, M., & Montero, J. (2025). Reducing interpretative ambiguity in an educational environment with ChatGPT. Computers and Education, 225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105182
Harbison, L., & Simmons, K. (2024). Fundamentals of descriptive statistics. Journal of Dental Hygiene, 98(5), 51–54. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85206505899&partnerID=40&md5=2755b42c042ac344c1a50fff0186c20f
Ishak, C. N., Basthomi, Y., Widiati, U., Hidayati, M., & Yannuar, N. (2021). See: How Indonesian student writers use directives in academic texts. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 8(1),65–76. https://doi.org/10.20448/JOURNAL.509.2021.81.65.76
Ivanov, V. V, Solnyshkina, M. I., & Solovyev, V. D. (2018). Efficiency of text readability features in Russian academic texts. Komp’juternaja Lingvistika i Intellektual’nye Tehnologii, (17), 284–293. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85058052676&partnerID=40&md5=b5daa2d8dbe25a5dc4edc5fb06af7656
Johns, B. T., Dye, M., & Jones, M. N. (2016). The influence of contextual diversity on word learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 23(4), 1214–1220. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0980-7
Jones, M. N., Johns, B. T., & Recchia, G. (2012). The role of semantic diversity in lexical organization. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(2 SPL.ISSUE), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026727
Kearney, E., McMahon, K. L., Guenther, F., Arciuli, J., & de Zubicaray, G. I. (2025). Revisiting the concreteness effect: Non-arbitrary mappings between form and concreteness of English words influence lexical processing. Cognition, 254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105972
Maylawati, D. S., Kumar, Y. J., Kasmin, F., & Ramdhani, M. A. (2024). Deep sequential pattern mining for readability enhancement of Indonesian summarization. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), 14(1), 782. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v14i1.pp782-795
Miceli, G., Cardamone, E., & Raimondo, M. A. (2025). Art and science talk differently. The effect of language abstractness-concreteness on liking of artistic and scientific products. Journal of Business Research, 199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115559
Mulyono, H., & Artarini, S. (2021). Direct and indirect supports in an EFL academic writing classroom: New rhetorical genre perspective1. Mextesol Journal, 45(4). https://doi.org/10.61871/mj.v45n4-18
Núñez Batalla, F., González Márquez, R., Peláez González, M. B., González Laborda, I., Fernández Fernández, M., & Morato Galán, M. (2014). Acoustic voice analysis using the Praat programme: Comparative study with the Dr. Speech programme. Acta Otorrinolaringologica (English Edition), 65(3), 170–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otoeng.2014.05.007
Nurhayati, I. K., & Kurniasih, N. (2016). Improving academic writing standard: A challenge for universities. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 24(June), 187–204. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84996479919&partnerID=40&md5=b3896c9f4729049ab2d9e53cd35078ee
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2026 Herpindo Herpindo, Sri Wulandari, Danang Agung Restu Aji, Muhammad Nur Afiq, Maftukhin Ariefian, Muhammad Khoirul Huda

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




